On Fri, October 12, 2007 10:08 pm, Mark Foster wrote:
> Its all very well for those that know better to carry on like this, but I
> would suggest that those sortsa complaints only come from people who
> don't know better. They don't know how to interpret their Firewall
> warnings. And they don
On 10/12/07, Steve Atkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Oct 12, 2007, at 5:08 PM, Mark Foster wrote:
>
>
> >
> > (If some random dynamic IP host on the other side of the world
> > started hitting my firewall for no apparent reason, i'd be raising
> > my eyebrows too. Of course, these days,
On Oct 12, 2007, at 5:08 PM, Mark Foster wrote:
(If some random dynamic IP host on the other side of the world
started hitting my firewall for no apparent reason, i'd be raising
my eyebrows too. Of course, these days, I have a much better idea
of what is genuinely threatening and what
On Fri, 12 Oct 2007, Tim Franklin wrote:
On Fri, October 12, 2007 2:49 pm, Justin M. Streiner wrote:
"HOST x.x.x.x ON YOUR NETWORK PINGED ME I TAKE MY SECURITY
SERIOUSLY!! I'M CALLING THE FBI!!!"
That I can *sort* of understand - it's the flaming zealotry of "ALL ICMP
IS EEEVIL!" t
Ok.
To make my own contribution to this thread hijack somewhat operational...
How many people have had to add to their NOC/Abuse desk SOP:
"When someone calls threatening that they are the FBI/CIA/NSA/Your
grandmother returned from the dead...
but essentially, "Don't Panic. And they are b
On Fri, 12 Oct 2007, Leigh Porter wrote:
You are more likely to get 5000 zonealarm emails
Or a place on dshield's top 10.
Justin M. Streiner wrote:
On Fri, 12 Oct 2007, Chris Owen wrote:
You can't consider every wacko on the net when doing something like
this. Anyone who consider
On Fri, October 12, 2007 2:49 pm, Justin M. Streiner wrote:
> "HOST x.x.x.x ON YOUR NETWORK PINGED ME I TAKE MY SECURITY
> SERIOUSLY!! I'M CALLING THE FBI!!!"
That I can *sort* of understand - it's the flaming zealotry of "ALL ICMP
IS EEEVIL!" trickling down from 99% of firewall admins wor
On Fri, 12 Oct 2007, Leigh Porter wrote:
You are more likely to get 5000 zonealarm emails
Got tons of those...
...and BlackIce, DShield, Norton, SamSpade, and all the rest :)
But there were also lots of people who took time out of their busy day to
personally write their own flaming ema
You are more likely to get 5000 zonealarm emails
Justin M. Streiner wrote:
>
> On Fri, 12 Oct 2007, Chris Owen wrote:
>
>> You can't consider every wacko on the net when doing something like
>> this. Anyone who considers a ping an attack probably isn't worth
>> worrying about.
>
> I tend to
On Fri, 12 Oct 2007, Chris Owen wrote:
You can't consider every wacko on the net when doing something like this.
Anyone who considers a ping an attack probably isn't worth worrying about.
I tend to agree, but back when I manned the abuse desk (among others) at
my former employer, I would see
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Oct 12, 2007, at 12:50 AM, Roy wrote:
I guess no one told them that someone might consider this an attack?
You can't consider every wacko on the net when doing something like
this. Anyone who considers a ping an attack probably isn't worth
27MB? I duno, that's quite a lot.. I'll have to delete some mp3s first..
Duane Wessels wrote:
>
>
> ISI folks have been taking this census since at least mid 2003.
>
> We vizualized their data using our tool and then made a movie showing
> the changes from 2003 to late 2006. If you have 27 MB a
ISI folks have been taking this census since at least mid 2003.
We vizualized their data using our tool and then made a movie showing
the changes from 2003 to late 2006. If you have 27 MB and a few
minutes to spare you can download it from here:
http://maps.measurement-factory.com/gallery/USC-
lacklisted for a day or two.
Researchers ping through first full 'Internet census' in 25 years
No door-to-door canvassing here: This census involved the direction of
some 3 billion pings toward 2.8 billion allocated Internet addresses
from three machines ov
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- -- Randy Bush <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/20390?netht=101107dailynews2
>>> &&nladname=101107dailynews
>> Credit where credit is due:
>> http://www.xkcd.com/195/
>
>i guess you did not read the articl
>> http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/20390?netht=101107dailynews2&&nladname=101107dailynews
>>
> Credit where credit is due:
> http://www.xkcd.com/195/
i guess you did not read the article, eh?
randy
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- -- Roy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/20390?netht=101107dailynews2&&n
>ladname=101107dailynews
Credit where credit is due:
http://www.xkcd.com/195/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP Desktop 9.6
I guess no one told them that someone might consider this an attack? I
have set up detectors where pinging consecutive "honeypot" ip addresses
results in the source IP address being blacklisted for a day or two.
Researchers ping through first full '
18 matches
Mail list logo
