On 7/25/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
... fire department evacuating the data center, cutting off electricity
in the area, and forbidding the diesel generators to be switched on?
I know a guy who was at the US Data Centers Inc facility in
Marlborough, MA (before USDCI faile
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jeff Aitken) writes:
> ..., we had a failure at another datacenter that uses Piller units, which
> operate on the same basic principle as the Hitec ones. ...
i guess i never understood why anyone would install a piller that far from
the equator. (it spins like a top, on a ve
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ("Jonathan Lassoff") writes:
> Well, the fact still remains that operating a datacenter smack-dab in
> the center of some of the most inflated real estate in recent history
> is quite a castly endeavor.
yes. (speaking for both 365 main, and 529 bryant.)
> I really wouldn't be
Michael Dillon writes:
>> And the stories that the power guy I'm working with tells
>> about foreign facilities, particularly in middle east war
>> zones, are really scary...
>
>> We fundamentally do not have the facilities problem
>> completely nailed down to the point that things will never
On Tue, Jul 24, 2007 at 09:57:09PM -0500, Brandon Galbraith wrote:
> It appears that 365 is using the Hytec Continuous Power System [
> http://hitec.pageprocessor.nl/p3.php?RubriekID=2016], which is a motor,
> generator, flywheel, clutch, and Diesel engine all on the same shaft. They
> don't use b
Speaking on Deep Background, the Press Secretary whispered:
> Level 4 datacenters can, and will, fail. Nothing you can
> do including just doing 48V DC for everything are truly
> foolproof solutions.
Hard to find anyone who takes the -48vdc mantra to heart more
than an RBOC. Ditto on lightni
On Tue, Jul 24, 2007 at 11:57:37PM +, Paul Vixie wrote:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Seth Mattinen) writes:
>
> > I have a question: does anyone seriously accept "oh, power trouble" as a
> > reason your servers went offline? Where's the generators? UPS? Testing
> > said combination of UPS and ge
> And the stories that the power guy I'm working with tells
> about foreign facilities, particularly in middle east war
> zones, are really scary...
> We fundamentally do not have the facilities problem
> completely nailed down to the point that things will never
> drop. Level 4
> datacente
From: "Justin M. Streiner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2007 5:58 PM
Subject: Re: San Francisco Power Outage
Nothing quite like the sound of a whole machine
room spinning down at the same time. It gives you that lovely "oh shit"
feeling in the pit of
On Tue, 24 Jul 2007, Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET wrote:
(I remember two guys with VERY LONG screwdrivers poking a live transfer
switch to get it to reset properly, and was told to step back 20 feet as
thats how far they expected to get thrown if they did something wrong).
(I also remember them resetting
ge-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Adrian Chadd
> Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2007 7:54 PM
> To: Seth Mattinen
> Cc: nanog list
> Subject: Re: San Francisco Power Outage
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 24, 2007, Seth Mattinen wrote:
>
> > I
Yelp -- lost power.
-- mail forwarded, original message follows --
To: nanog@merit.edu
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: San Francisco Power Outage
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 15:54:08 -0700
Jonathan Lassoff wrote:
>
> Just a heads up to anyone on list that PG&E has just sustained
p their customers
> servers online with UPS.
>
> -Ray
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Adrian Chadd
> Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2007 7:54 PM
> To: Seth Mattinen
> Cc: nanog list
> Subject: Re: San Franc
Seth wrote:
>Jonathan Lassoff wrote:
>>
>> Just a heads up to anyone on list that PG&E has just sustained a large
>> outage in San Francisco that has caused a few hiccups (both network,
>> electrical, infrastructural, etc.) around the city.
>>
>> I've confirmed that both customers in 365 Main a
7:54 PM
To: Seth Mattinen
Cc: nanog list
Subject: Re: San Francisco Power Outage
On Tue, Jul 24, 2007, Seth Mattinen wrote:
> I have a question: does anyone seriously accept "oh, power trouble" as
a
> reason your servers went offline? Where's the generators? UPS? Testing
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Seth Mattinen) writes:
> I have a question: does anyone seriously accept "oh, power trouble" as a
> reason your servers went offline? Where's the generators? UPS? Testing
> said combination of UPS and generators? What if it was important? I
> honestly find it hard to believe
On 7/24/07, Seth Mattinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have a question: does anyone seriously accept "oh, power trouble" as a
reason your servers went offline? Where's the generators? UPS? Testing
said combination of UPS and generators? What if it was important? I
honestly find it hard to belie
On Tue, Jul 24, 2007, Seth Mattinen wrote:
> I have a question: does anyone seriously accept "oh, power trouble" as a
> reason your servers went offline? Where's the generators? UPS? Testing
> said combination of UPS and generators? What if it was important? I
> honestly find it hard to believ
Jonathan Lassoff wrote:
Just a heads up to anyone on list that PG&E has just sustained a large
outage in San Francisco that has caused a few hiccups (both network,
electrical, infrastructural, etc.) around the city.
I've confirmed that both customers in 365 Main and parts of telecom 1
have bot
Just a heads up to anyone on list that PG&E has just sustained a large
outage in San Francisco that has caused a few hiccups (both network,
electrical, infrastructural, etc.) around the city.
I've confirmed that both customers in 365 Main and parts of telecom 1
have both sustained brief blackout
20 matches
Mail list logo
