RE: W32.SqlSlammer

2003-01-25 Thread Alex Rubenstein
sage- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > Drew Weaver > Sent: Saturday, January 25, 2003 2:21 PM > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > Subject: W32.SqlSlammer > > > > By the way, I know you guys probably don't care but McAfee is saying

RE: W32.SqlSlammer

2003-01-25 Thread Bender, Andrew
Can you confirm / forward a trace of what is affecting a supposedly patched & rebooted machine? Thanks, Andrew taqua.com > -Original Message- > From: Drew Weaver [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Saturday, January 25, 2003 1:21 PM > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'

Re: W32.SqlSlammer

2003-01-25 Thread Charles Sprickman
On Sat, 25 Jan 2003, Drew Weaver wrote: > By the way, I know you guys probably don't care but McAfee is saying that if > you have SP3 on your windows2000 server you will not be infected with > SQLSlammer, this is absolutely NOT true, I have a box with sp3 and it IS > infected. SP3 for W2K or SP3

RE: W32.SqlSlammer

2003-01-25 Thread andrew2
, January 25, 2003 2:21 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: W32.SqlSlammer By the way, I know you guys probably don't care but McAfee is saying that if you have SP3 on your windows2000 server you will not be infected with SQLSlammer, this is absolutely NOT true, I have a box with sp3 and

Re: W32.SqlSlammer

2003-01-25 Thread Simon Lockhart
On Sat Jan 25, 2003 at 02:21:21PM -0500, Drew Weaver wrote: > > By the way, I know you guys probably don't care but McAfee is saying that if > you have SP3 on your windows2000 server you will not be infected with > SQLSlammer, this is absolutely NOT true, I have a box with sp3 and it IS > infecte

Re: W32.SqlSlammer

2003-01-25 Thread Avleen Vig
On Sat, Jan 25, 2003 at 02:21:21PM -0500, Drew Weaver wrote: > > By the way, I know you guys probably don't care but McAfee is saying that if > you have SP3 on your windows2000 server you will not be infected with > SQLSlammer, this is absolutely NOT true, I have a box with sp3 and it IS > infect

Re: W32.SqlSlammer

2003-01-25 Thread Dave Stewart
At 02:21 PM 1/25/2003, you wrote: By the way, I know you guys probably don't care but McAfee is saying that if you have SP3 on your windows2000 server you will not be infected with SQLSlammer, this is absolutely NOT true, I have a box with sp3 and it IS infected. To clarify, we're talking abou

Re: W32.SqlSlammer

2003-01-25 Thread K. Scott Bethke
Drew, There *IS* a difference between windows SP3 and Microsoft SQL2000 SP3.. you do know that right? -Scotty > By the way, I know you guys probably don't care but McAfee is saying that if > you have SP3 on your windows2000 server you will not be infected with > SQLSlammer, this is absolutely

W32.SqlSlammer

2003-01-25 Thread Drew Weaver
By the way, I know you guys probably don't care but McAfee is saying that if you have SP3 on your windows2000 server you will not be infected with SQLSlammer, this is absolutely NOT true, I have a box with sp3 and it IS infected. -Drew