>>> this would be a straight sample, before filtering, ip address
>>> blocking, etc.
>> i realize this is difficult, as all of us go through much effort to
>> reject this stuff as early as possible. but it will be a sample
>> unbiased by your filtering techniques.
> How do you classify email as s
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
> Of Marshall Eubanks
> Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2008 9:39 AM
> To: William Waites
> Cc: Rich Kulawiec; North American Network Operators Group
> Subject: Re: spam wanted :)
>
>
> Randy Bush <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >> this would be a straight sample, before filtering, ip address
> >> blocking, etc.
> >
> > i realize this is difficult, as all of us go through much effort to
> > reject this stuff as early as possible. but it will be a sample
> > unbiased by your f
Randy Bush <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> this would be a straight sample, before filtering, ip address
>> blocking, etc.
>
> i realize this is difficult, as all of us go through much effort to
> reject this stuff as early as possible. but it will be a sample
> unbiased by your filtering techniq
>> Request for clarification: do you mean "spam originating at IP addresses
>> believed to be in Europe"
> yes.
a! speaking of non-reading
i mean spam arriving at port 25 on a european host. and an unfiltered
unblocked port 25, no dnsbl, ...
it looks like i have a great stateside volunt
TECTED] On Behalf Of
Marshall Eubanks
Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2008 9:39 AM
To: William Waites
Cc: Rich Kulawiec; North American Network Operators Group
Subject: Re: spam wanted :)
On Apr 10, 2008, at 9:35 AM, William Waites wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 08:55:21AM -0400, Rich Kulawiec
Rich Kulawiec wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 06:32:53PM +0900, Randy Bush wrote:
>> for a measurement experiment, i would like O(100k) *headers* from spam
>> from europe and a similar sample from the states.
> Request for clarification: do you mean "spam originating at IP addresses
> believed to
On Apr 10, 2008, at 9:35 AM, William Waites wrote:
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 08:55:21AM -0400, Rich Kulawiec wrote:
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 06:32:53PM +0900, Randy Bush wrote:
for a measurement experiment, i would like O(100k) *headers* from
spam
from europe and a similar sample from the s
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 08:55:21AM -0400, Rich Kulawiec wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 06:32:53PM +0900, Randy Bush wrote:
> > for a measurement experiment, i would like O(100k) *headers* from spam
> > from europe and a similar sample from the states.
>
> Request for clarification: do you me
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 06:32:53PM +0900, Randy Bush wrote:
> for a measurement experiment, i would like O(100k) *headers* from spam
> from europe and a similar sample from the states.
Request for clarification: do you mean "spam originating at IP addresses
believed to be in Europe" or "spam rece
for a measurement experiment, i would like O(100k) *headers* from spam
from europe and a similar sample from the states.
this would be a straight sample, before filtering, ip address blocking, etc.
if you can help, please drop me a note and we can discuss how the sample
is taken and how delivere
11 matches
Mail list logo
