How about unused and/or private/local diffserve code points?
Ron Bonica wrote:
> Folks,
>
> I would love to see the IETF OPSEC WG publish a document on the pros and
> cons of filtering optioned packets.
>
> Would anybody on this list be willing to author an Internet Draft?
>
>
Great question Jared! But I think for WPS to work you have to dial FROM a
T-Mobile device rather than TO the device. But of course if the system is
kaput WPS will be too.
Based on what's happening at Twitter will we need TPS (Twitter Priority
Service) some day in the near future?
Marc
http://www.dieselserviceandsupply.com/Diesel_Fuel_Consumption.aspx
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 5:49 PM, Lyndon Nerenberg (VE6BBM/VE7TFX)
wrote:
>> FWIW: http://www.he.net/releases/release18.html
>
> How long can they go on those 3000 gallons under their current
> load?
>
>
>
According to what I got from t-mobile
It out and in but only between t-mobile devices, phone, sms, and data.
Data to the rest, as well as cell and sms to the rest still work
Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile
> FWIW: http://www.he.net/releases/release18.html
How long can they go on those 3000 gallons under their current
load?
Global outage
--Original Message--
From: charles.jougl...@cox.com
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: T-Mobile ?
Sent: Nov 3, 2009 17:18
Anyone hear of any issues on the T-Mobile network? Seems as if we cannot reach
anyone with a T-Mobile cell phone. Dialing out works sporadically, but calls
The parties are targeting completion of the transaction in the first
quarter of 2010. The transaction will be subject to customary closing
conditions, including the approval of Switch and Data’s stockholders
and regulatory approvals.
On Nov 3, 2009, at 5:46 PM, Marshall Eubanks wrote:
Ce
Anyone hear of any issues on the T-Mobile network? Seems as if we cannot reach
anyone with a T-Mobile cell phone. Dialing out works sporadically, but calls
drop frequently.
Thanks,
Charles
We're using T-Mobile here, no issues reported. I have staff at sites
in Virginia, California, and Arizona.
Jeff
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 8:18 PM, wrote:
> Anyone hear of any issues on the T-Mobile network? Seems as if we cannot
> reach anyone with a T-Mobile cell phone. Dialing out works spora
Hard down in Fairfax, VA here. Inbound calls are met with a fast busy (no
path) signal. Outbound calls fail.
Inbound/outbound SMS text has not worked since at least 6:00PM EST.
Surprisingly the IP network seems to still be up. BlackBerry specific
functions such as BlackBerry email (BIS) and BB
This was brought up on the outages list. T-Mobile is currently experiencing
large scale outbound voice and data outages across the nation right now. No
current ETA, estimates are several hours.
Paul B.
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 7:18 PM, wrote:
> Anyone hear of any issues on the T-Mobile network?
I also noticed an outage here in Colorado, however the service appears to be
back for us now, at least incoming and outgoing calls, plus data is
available.
-DS
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 18:23, Michael Schuler wrote:
> Illinois is experiencing the outtage as well looks to be all of the U.S.
>
> --
>
Certainly not yet.
On Nov 3, 2009, at 5:38 PM, Mike Lyon wrote:
Aren't they the same company now?
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 2:35 PM, Konstantin Bezruchenko
wrote:
Hi all,
Just wondering if someone here can offer in building dark fiber
(cross
connects) inside Infomart (1950 Stemmons Freeway,
Thank you for posting this. I have a G1 and have randomly seen this
exact picture pop up on my screen without explanation. I had
previously assured myself I was going crazy since I was never able to
reproduce the glitch in front of anyone.
Jeff
> But the good news is that they apparently added a
I don't think AT&T cares, since I complained about a massive snowshoe
spamming campaign a couple of months ago--no action taken it
seems--and they have netblocks all over the place there. A bunch of
customers were calling me since their junk was being scored low by
spamassassin and ending up in in
Voice service works in the Austin market but SMS is down.
This thread suggests something major died:
http://www.howardforums.com/showthread.php?t=1585834
On Nov 3, 2009, at 7:19 PM, Ben Carleton wrote:
We are also seeing this in the Metro NY market.
Ben
On Nov 3, 2009, at 8:18 PM, wrote:
On Tue, Nov 03, 2009 at 12:34:37PM -0500, Christopher Morrow wrote:
> 3) did this activity start prior to today? (looking at the headers in
> the original post)
e-mail spam from 99.51.80.0/23 starting 04/15/2009, and from
99.51.84.0/24 starting 09/21/2009.
--
Henry Yen
Hi all,
Just wondering if someone here can offer in building dark fiber (cross
connects) inside Infomart (1950 Stemmons Freeway, Dallas, TX). We are
trying to get from Equinix to Switch and Data.
Please reply offlist. Thanks!
-Konstantin
FWIW: http://www.he.net/releases/release18.html
Jeff
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 2:28 PM, William Pitcock
wrote:
> Yeah. They had yet another power outage. The fourth in 16 months.
>
> Luckily we have already begun plans to leave their facility.
>
> William
> --Original Message--
> From: Ti
In message <5414.1257270...@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu w
rites:
> On Tue, 03 Nov 2009 08:11:15 PST, Mike said:
> >
> > Small-site multi-homing is one of the great inequities of the
> > Internet and one that can, and should, be solved. I envision an Internet
> > of the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2009.11.03 17:18:06, charles.jougl...@cox.com wrote:
> Anyone hear of any issues on the T-Mobile network? Seems as if we cannot
> reach anyone with a T-Mobile cell phone. Dialing out works sporadically, but
> calls drop frequently.
>
> Thanks,
On Nov 3, 2009, at 8:51 PM, mark [at] edgewire wrote:
Hi all,
Just out of curiosity for those whom may manage Hotel Wifi networks
(I know I know, not really ISP level but since we're on the topic of
port blocking). Does anyone actually make an effort to be blocking
port 443? I've had tha
Folks,
I would love to see the IETF OPSEC WG publish a document on the pros and
cons of filtering optioned packets.
Would anybody on this list be willing to author an Internet Draft?
Ron
(co-director IETF O&M Area)
Luca T
Outtage is here in Orlando, FL as well. Impossible to send or receive texts.
All voice calls are possible with non-TMobile users. Anything in-network is hit
or miss. Cannot reach any TMobile users in Boston.
--Original Message--
From: rodrick brown
To: Michael Schuler
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
On Tue, 3 Nov 2009 12:10:43 -0800
"Aaron L. Meehan" wrote:
> I don't think AT&T cares, since I complained about a massive snowshoe
> spamming campaign a couple of months ago--no action taken it
> seems--and they have netblocks all over the place there. A bunch of
> customers were calling me sinc
We are also seeing this in the Metro NY market.
Ben
On Nov 3, 2009, at 8:18 PM, wrote:
Anyone hear of any issues on the T-Mobile network? Seems as if we
cannot reach anyone with a T-Mobile cell phone. Dialing out works
sporadically, but calls drop frequently.
Thanks,
Charles
Just filter it and move on- business as usual. If we barked up every tree
we'd never get any real work done.
On Nov 3, 2009 11:33 AM, "Michael Peddemors" wrote:
A new block under AT&T, listed as being owned by:
The Karcher Group Inc. ATTIS-9951800 (NET-99-51-80-0-1) 99.51.80.0 -
99.51.81.255
J
Clue Store wrote:
> I think you're missing my point and did not read my post completely.
>
> First off, BGP was never mentioned in my post.
Oops, you are correct. Somebody else said "BGP." You spoke of the
existing table, and so I had BGP in my mind, and I muddled the two
together. Mea culp
Aren't they the same company now?
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 2:35 PM, Konstantin Bezruchenko
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Just wondering if someone here can offer in building dark fiber (cross
> connects) inside Infomart (1950 Stemmons Freeway, Dallas, TX). We are trying
> to get from Equinix to Switch and D
I think you're missing my point and did not read my post completely.
First off, BGP was never mentioned in my post.
By the time these 'dreamers' want to announce a /29 to multiple providers
and have everyone accept them with this new light weight protocol you speak
about, there will hopefully be
Folks,
I would love to see the IETF OPSEC WG publish a Best Common Practices
document on ISP Port filtering. The document would capture information
similar to that offered by Justin.
Would anybody on this list be willing to author an Internet Draft?
Ron
Tico wrote:
> Hey guys,
>
> I can't get through to Hurricane Electric, and they seem to be having an
> outage at their Fremont-2 facility again (as of 17:30 UTC or
> thereabouts) --
> ticket system is unanswered, phones go to voicemail, all equipment is
> unreachable.
Yes, there was a power outag
Clue Store wrote:
> Well you and the rest of these so called "dreamers" can help with the
> purchase of my new routers that don't exist yet to support you wanting to
> multi-home a /29 and have the rest of the Internet world hold all of these
> said /29's in their tables. Most folks who get a /29'
valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
> On Tue, 03 Nov 2009 08:11:15 PST, Mike said:
>> Small-site multi-homing is one of the great inequities of the
>> Internet and one that can, and should, be solved. I envision an Internet
>> of the future where anyone with any mixture of any type of network
>
Yeah. They had yet another power outage. The fourth in 16 months.
Luckily we have already begun plans to leave their facility.
William
--Original Message--
From: Tico
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: HE.net, Fremont-2 outage?
Sent: Nov 3, 2009 1:50 PM
Hey guys,
I can't get through to Hurr
Hey guys,
I can't get through to Hurricane Electric, and they seem to be having an
outage at their Fremont-2 facility again (as of 17:30 UTC or thereabouts) --
ticket system is unanswered, phones go to voicemail, all equipment is
unreachable.
Does anyone here have a presence at 48233 Warm Spr
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 11:54 AM, Michael Peddemors
wrote:
> It was mentioned that this might be offtopic for this list, however I did want
> to get a feel for the attitudes of network operators, in light of the recent
> discussions regarding the Russian Operators.. and blocking routing et al..
>
>
Hi all,
Just out of curiosity for those whom may manage Hotel Wifi networks (I
know I know, not really ISP level but since we're on the topic of port
blocking). Does anyone actually make an effort to be blocking port
443? I've had that experience at a few Hotels in Philippines and I
can't
Has anyone here with WPS/GETS tested calling T-Mobile users?
I'm curious to know results.
- Jared
While the idea of seamless routing sounds great, so does world peace... I
don't think I will see either in my lifetime. There are some technical
hurdles you will have to solve first.
1st how do I solve security (preventing spoofing and other evil deeds done by
rouge networks).
2nd how can my s
On Tue, 03 Nov 2009 08:11:15 PST, Mike said:
>
> Small-site multi-homing is one of the great inequities of the
> Internet and one that can, and should, be solved. I envision an Internet
> of the future where anyone with any mixture of any type of network
> connections can achieve, automatic
On Tue, 3 Nov 2009, Jay Hennigan wrote:
I don't see how this relates to IPv4-runout. The allocation (to AT&T)
isn't all that new...and when they cancel this spammer, the space will
undoubtedly be assigned to another customer.
And that other customer will find that it's poisoned space and wil
> If 500 companies are currently
> announcing /24s to be heard, but could be moved to /29s, then you still
> have 500 route announcements. You just have a lot less waste.
That's my situation here. I've got a /24 with fewer than 10 public IPs
active, because I need those 10 hosts to be reachable e
Well you and the rest of these so called "dreamers" can help with the
purchase of my new routers that don't exist yet to support you wanting to
multi-home a /29 and have the rest of the Internet world hold all of these
said /29's in their tables. Most folks who get a /29's don't care how they
get t
This problem also seems to be affecting tmo users in NYC. I'm unable
to reach any tmo user from Att network
Sent from my iPhone 3GS.
On Nov 3, 2009, at 8:23 PM, Michael Schuler wrote:
Illinois is experiencing the outtage as well looks to be all of the
U.S.
--
Is ait an mac an sol.
Life i
Jon Lewis wrote:
On Tue, 3 Nov 2009, Michael Peddemors wrote:
A new block under AT&T, listed as being owned by:
The Karcher Group Inc. ATTIS-9951800 (NET-99-51-80-0-1) 99.51.80.0 -
99.51.81.255
Just started an email marketing campaign to addresses stripped from
the web..
There's a far more
Thanks. Experiencing the inability to reach several personnel.
Thanks,
Charles
-Original Message-
From: Paul Bosworth [mailto:pboswo...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 03, 2009 7:22 PM
To: Jouglard, Charles (CCI-Louisiana)
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: T-Mobile ?
This was brought
That release is from 10/31/01.
On Tue, 2009-11-03 at 20:04 -0500, Jeffrey Lyon wrote:
> FWIW: http://www.he.net/releases/release18.html
>
> Jeff
>
> On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 2:28 PM, William Pitcock
> wrote:
> > Yeah. They had yet another power outage. The fourth in 16 months.
> >
> > Luckily
Illinois is experiencing the outtage as well looks to be all of the U.S.
--
Is ait an mac an sol.
Life is strange (such is life).
On Nov 3, 2009, at 7:19 PM, Ben Carleton wrote:
We are also seeing this in the Metro NY market.
Ben
On Nov 3, 2009, at 8:18 PM, wrote:
Anyone hear of any issu
Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
> On Nov 3, 2009, at 8:18 PM, wrote:
>
>> Anyone hear of any issues on the T-Mobile network? Seems as if we
>> cannot reach anyone with a T-Mobile cell phone. Dialing out works
>> sporadically, but calls drop frequently.
>
> T-Mobile has admitted the outage. Apparent
On Tue, 3 Nov 2009, Michael Peddemors wrote:
A new block under AT&T, listed as being owned by:
The Karcher Group Inc. ATTIS-9951800 (NET-99-51-80-0-1) 99.51.80.0 -
99.51.81.255
Just started an email marketing campaign to addresses stripped from the web..
We wouldn't run out of IP's if this di
Small-site multi-homing is one of the great inequities of the
Internet and one that can, and should, be solved. I envision an Internet
of the future where anyone with any mixture of any type of network
connections can achieve, automatically, provider independence and
inbound/outbound load
Joe Maimon wrote:
>
> I dont know if communities is really the best thing to keep overloading
> this way. Whats wrong with dedicating a new attribute for automating
> policy?
Well there's always flowspec, as an example...
Richard A Steenbergen wrote:
On Sun, Nov 01, 2009 at 11:54:07PM -0500, Steve Bertrand wrote:
I'm not a political person. Take it for what it is worth.
What is the issue here, that your DSL provider won't speak BGP with you
no matter how many times you've asked, so you're complaining to NANO
Joel Jaeggli wrote:
So this questions we have approached from time to time. Is there some
worth to be had in finding some consensus (assuming such a thing is
possible) on a subset of the features that people use communities for
that could be standardized? particularly in the context of source
Steve Bertrand wrote:
I'm venting. I'm allowed to vent here. I think I'm qualified to do so
Sorry, this is not facebook. You're not allowed to randomly splurt inane
and unexplaned rants and complaints.
At the very least it makes you look stupid to your peers, and at worst
it will harm your fu
Linux always worked best for us as well, was easy running a livecd with
laptops. We found that two windows XP machines, same identical hardware and
OS load yielded different registry settings (or lack thereof) for TCP Window
setting.
Jason
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 6:18 AM, Bret Clark wrote:
>
On Tue, 3 Nov 2009, Jason Biel wrote:
Please take note with using iperf that you'll want to make sure the
appropriate TCP Window Size has been negotiated. We recently did some
testing with systems that had decided to pick less than optimal window sizes
and in turn had to manually set the size w
True, we usually find Linux based machines work better running IPerf
then Windows (at least out of the box) because of the TCP window
sizewell Windows XP at least, don't know about Vista or 7.
Jason Biel wrote:
Please take note with using iperf that you'll want to make sure the
app
Please take note with using iperf that you'll want to make sure the
appropriate TCP Window Size has been negotiated. We recently did some
testing with systems that had decided to pick less than optimal window sizes
and in turn had to manually set the size within iperf options.
Jason
On Tue, Nov
Hello,
Iperf is pretty good at this ... It s free
Ben
-Message d'origine-
De : Mark Urbach [mailto:mark.urb...@pnpt.com]
Envoyé : lundi 2 novembre 2009 22:57
À : nanog@nanog.org
Objet : Speed Testing and Throughput testing
Anyone have a good solution to get "accurate" speed results w
61 matches
Mail list logo
