On Mon, 18 Jul 2022 at 18:48, Tom Beecher wrote:
> Is it an accurate representation of your position here that NOT allowing any
> user in the sudo group access to run any command they want is somehow
> 'security theater' then?
I'd rather say, if your only comment on a matter is unsolicited
inf
I couldn't have replied better-- J. HellenthalThe fact that there's a highway to Hell but only a stairway to Heaven says a lot about anticipated traffic volume.On Jul 18, 2022, at 10:38, Tom Beecher wrote:But in the mean time (and generally) this should really only be used in a dedicated VM. An
> Believe being the operative word. Maybe you are right, maybe not,
> presenting it as factual truth is dishonest and potentially harmful.
>
> My general rule of thumb, satisfy legal, regulatory and customer
> contract requirements for infosec and other than that, largely ignore
> policies which ar
>
> But in the mean time (and generally) this should really only be used in a
> dedicated VM. And the *primary* audience is my networks class--even though
> I shared with the broader networking community, in case others might find
> it useful or have feedback (thank you!).
>
It's a cardinal rule
Okay so I suppose how many years are we allocating mentally for them to take
any action?
From: Mel Beckman
Sent: Saturday, July 16, 2022 8:37 PM
To: Forrest Christian (List Account)
Cc: Drew Weaver ; nanog list
Subject: Re: Papers/analysis on network equipment pricing since
pandemic/banning
5 matches
Mail list logo
