Folks -
At some point, a society decides that X is important enough to the
society as a whole, that something official is in the overall
interest. Roads, immigration, whatever. That it's necessary to require
that some things be done (or not be done).
Peering may very well not be in that category,
On Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 7:04 PM, Larry Sheldon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> More regs and more laws is certainly not in the running.
Why?
> How about: If there is a need, somebody will provide at a suitable price?
> If no body steps up, we don't need it.
There seems to be ample evidence, in man
2 matches
Mail list logo