I don't think AT&T cares, since I complained about a massive snowshoe
spamming campaign a couple of months ago--no action taken it
seems--and they have netblocks all over the place there. A bunch of
customers were calling me since their junk was being scored low by
spamassassin and ending up in in
On Tue, Nov 03, 2009 at 12:34:37PM -0500, Christopher Morrow wrote:
> 3) did this activity start prior to today? (looking at the headers in
> the original post)
e-mail spam from 99.51.80.0/23 starting 04/15/2009, and from
99.51.84.0/24 starting 09/21/2009.
--
Henry Yen
On Tue, 3 Nov 2009 12:10:43 -0800
"Aaron L. Meehan" wrote:
> I don't think AT&T cares, since I complained about a massive snowshoe
> spamming campaign a couple of months ago--no action taken it
> seems--and they have netblocks all over the place there. A bunch of
> customers were calling me sinc
Just filter it and move on- business as usual. If we barked up every tree
we'd never get any real work done.
On Nov 3, 2009 11:33 AM, "Michael Peddemors" wrote:
A new block under AT&T, listed as being owned by:
The Karcher Group Inc. ATTIS-9951800 (NET-99-51-80-0-1) 99.51.80.0 -
99.51.81.255
J
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 11:54 AM, Michael Peddemors
wrote:
> It was mentioned that this might be offtopic for this list, however I did want
> to get a feel for the attitudes of network operators, in light of the recent
> discussions regarding the Russian Operators.. and blocking routing et al..
>
>
On Tue, 3 Nov 2009, Michael Peddemors wrote:
A new block under AT&T, listed as being owned by:
The Karcher Group Inc. ATTIS-9951800 (NET-99-51-80-0-1) 99.51.80.0 -
99.51.81.255
Just started an email marketing campaign to addresses stripped from the web..
We wouldn't run out of IP's if this di
6 matches
Mail list logo
