On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 16:06, Joe wrote:
>
>
> The topic of sunspots is certainly familiar from long ago. We had a
> 7513
> that crashed unexpectedly, upon a review of the data available, it was
> determined
> that a parity error had occurred. I can't remember the exact error as it was
> s
The topic of sunspots is certainly familiar from long ago. We had a
7513
that crashed unexpectedly, upon a review of the data available, it was
determined
that a parity error had occurred. I can't remember the exact error as it was
several
years ago, but upon a quick search this article
ing my GCI BlackBerry
- Original Message -
From: Leigh Porter
To: Warren Bailey; valdis.kletni...@vt.edu ;
wavetos...@googlemail.com
Cc: vi...@isc.org ; r...@seastrom.com ;
na...@merit.edu
Sent: Sun Apr 11 12:39:39 2010
Subject: Re: Solar Flux (was: Re: China prefix hijack)
There is a guy
; Robert E. Seastrom ;
na...@merit.edu
Sent: Sun Apr 11 08:36:05 2010
Subject: Re: Solar Flux (was: Re: China prefix hijack)
On Sun, 11 Apr 2010 16:58:40 BST, Michael Dillon said:
> Would a Faraday cage be sufficient to protect against cosmic ray bit-flipping
> and how could you retrofit a F
2010
Subject: Re: Solar Flux (was: Re: China prefix hijack)
On Sun, 11 Apr 2010 16:58:40 BST, Michael Dillon said:
> Would a Faraday cage be sufficient to protect against cosmic ray bit-flipping
> and how could you retrofit a Faraday cage onto a rack or two of gear?
Scientists build ne
On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 7:07 AM, Robert E. Seastrom wrote:
> We've seen great increases in CPU and memory speeds as well as disk
> densities since the last maximum (March 2000). Speccing ECC memory is
> a reasonable start, but this sort of thing has been a problem in the
> past (anyone remember
lock on
it, the odds of its random noise being something decipherable are much more
acceptable than normal.
- Original Message -
From: "Robert E. Seastrom"
To: "Paul Vixie"
Cc:
Sent: Sunday, April 11, 2010 9:07 AM
Subject: Solar Flux (was: Re: China pref
On Sun, 11 Apr 2010 16:58:40 BST, Michael Dillon said:
> Would a Faraday cage be sufficient to protect against cosmic ray bit-flipping
> and how could you retrofit a Faraday cage onto a rack or two of gear?
Scientists build neutrino detectors in mines 8,000 feet underground because
that much rock
> That is likely to be an increasing problem in upcoming months/years.
> Solar cycle 24 started in August '09; we're ramping up on the way out
> of a more serious than usual sunspot minimum.
I wonder what kind of buildings are less susceptible to these kinds
of problems. And is there a good way to
Paul Vixie writes:
> i'm more inclined to blame the heavy solar wind this month and to assume
> that chinanet's routers don't use ECC on the RAM containing their RIBs and
> that chinanet's router jockeys are in quite a sweat about this bad publicity.
> --
> Paul Vixie
> KI6YSY
That is likely t
10 matches
Mail list logo
