> The idea of dividing into specialties seems to upset a few
> people. I'm not sure if that's because they're afraid
> they'll miss some discussion, or if it's because they're
> afraid somebody will miss them discussing something. If the
> former, specialty lists shouldn't cause them any prob
> I wonder whether a better solution might be to create a
> second NANOG list for all the non-core operational issues
> from mail to P2p to botnets. People who are only interested
> in the traditional NANOG core, can stay away. People who are
> interested in broader operational issues can join
