Re: Review request for JDK-8047366 and JDK-8141505

2015-11-12 Thread Sundararajan Athijegannathan
+1 On 11/11/2015 8:50 PM, Hannes Wallnoefer wrote: Please review JDK-8047366 and JDK-8141505. These are two trivial test-only fixes enabled by the recent double conversion commit. http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~hannesw/8047366/webrev/ http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~hannesw/8141505/webrev/ Thanks,

Re: Review request for JDK-8142864: Raw types warning in WeakValueCache

2015-11-12 Thread Sundararajan Athijegannathan
+1 On 11/12/2015 9:06 PM, Hannes Wallnoefer wrote: Please review JDK-8142864: Raw types warning in WeakValueCache: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~hannesw/8142864/webrev/ This removes a warning in WeakValueCache.java, and I also reduced methods by combining code as suggested by Attila. Furtherm

Re: Review request for JDK-8142864: Raw types warning in WeakValueCache

2015-11-12 Thread Michael Haupt
Hi Hannes, lower-case thumbs up. Best, Michael > Am 12.11.2015 um 16:36 schrieb Hannes Wallnoefer > : > > Please review JDK-8142864: Raw types warning in WeakValueCache: > > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~hannesw/8142864/webrev/ > > This removes a warning in WeakValueCache.java, and I also red

Review request for JDK-8142864: Raw types warning in WeakValueCache

2015-11-12 Thread Hannes Wallnoefer
Please review JDK-8142864: Raw types warning in WeakValueCache: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~hannesw/8142864/webrev/ This removes a warning in WeakValueCache.java, and I also reduced methods by combining code as suggested by Attila. Furthermore I renamed method in isWrappedPrimitiveAndObject i

Re: RFR 8142857: Enable all nashorn "api" tests for jtreg test run

2015-11-12 Thread Michael Haupt
Hi Sundar, yep, lower-case thumbs up. It's *good* to cover more tests with jtreg. Best, Michael > Am 12.11.2015 um 14:43 schrieb Sundararajan Athijegannathan > : > > Please review http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sundar/8142857/webrev.00/ for > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8142857 >

Re: RFR 8142857: Enable all nashorn "api" tests for jtreg test run

2015-11-12 Thread Attila Szegedi
+1 > On Nov 12, 2015, at 2:43 PM, Sundararajan Athijegannathan > wrote: > > Please review http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sundar/8142857/webrev.00/ for > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8142857 > > Thanks, > -Sundar >

Re: RFR 8142857: Enable all nashorn "api" tests for jtreg test run

2015-11-12 Thread Sundararajan Athijegannathan
Thanks. Made that static initializer change and pushed. Updated webrev for the record: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sundar/8142857/webrev.01/ -Sundar On 11/12/2015 7:49 PM, Hannes Wallnoefer wrote: +1 The static fields in ParseAPITest.java are set twice, if you remove the first initializer

Re: RFR 8142857: Enable all nashorn "api" tests for jtreg test run

2015-11-12 Thread Hannes Wallnoefer
+1 The static fields in ParseAPITest.java are set twice, if you remove the first initializer they could remain final. Hannes Am 2015-11-12 um 14:43 schrieb Sundararajan Athijegannathan: Please review http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sundar/8142857/webrev.00/ for https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/brow

RFR 8142857: Enable all nashorn "api" tests for jtreg test run

2015-11-12 Thread Sundararajan Athijegannathan
Please review http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sundar/8142857/webrev.00/ for https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8142857 Thanks, -Sundar

Re: URGENT: JDK 9 RFR of JDK-8142501: nashorn tests failing after recent changes

2015-11-12 Thread Hannes Wallnöfer
+1 Am Don, 12. Nov, 2015 um 5:43 schrieb Sundararajan Athijegannathan : Hi, [ Replying based on url from JIRA update. I'm yet to get email from nashorn-dev list] Nashorn team runs test via "ant clean test". Only a subset of tests are enabled for jtreg by appropriate jtreg tags. In this ca

Re: URGENT: JDK 9 RFR of JDK-8142501: nashorn tests failing after recent changes

2015-11-12 Thread Sundararajan Athijegannathan
That was in response to this email -> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/nashorn-dev/2015-November/005562.html On 11/12/2015 10:13 AM, Sundararajan Athijegannathan wrote: Hi, [ Replying based on url from JIRA update. I'm yet to get email from nashorn-dev list] Nashorn team runs test via

Re: Review request for JDK-8047366 and JDK-8141505

2015-11-12 Thread Marcus Lagergren
+1 > On 11 Nov 2015, at 16:26, Sundararajan Athijegannathan > wrote: > > +1 > > On 11/11/2015 8:50 PM, Hannes Wallnoefer wrote: >> Please review JDK-8047366 and JDK-8141505. >> >> These are two trivial test-only fixes enabled by the recent double >> conversion commit. >> >> http://cr.openjd