David Miller wrote:
> From: David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 15:25:59 -0700 (PDT)
>
>> Can you guys please just state upfront what virtualization
>> issue is made more difficult by features you want to remove?
>
> Sorry, I mentioned "virtualization" because that's been th
David Miller wrote:
From: David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 15:25:59 -0700 (PDT)
Can you guys please just state upfront what virtualization
issue is made more difficult by features you want to remove?
Sorry, I mentioned "virtualization" because that's been the
largest ma
From: David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 15:25:59 -0700 (PDT)
> Can you guys please just state upfront what virtualization
> issue is made more difficult by features you want to remove?
Sorry, I mentioned "virtualization" because that's been the
largest majority of the cases
From: Vlad Yasevich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 14:03:37 -0400
> So, I am looking for technical reasons why this is permitted.
I am looking for a technical reason why you find a need
to discover this feature and want the remove it :-)
Can you guys please just state upfront what vi
> For v6, there are plenty of operational reasons to not allow this. You
really
> turn unicast into anycast when you do this and there are special rules
to
> be followed.
I don't see it that way. The only "problem" I can think of offhand
is that you can't use a multi-interface address t
David Stevens wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 10/29/2007 11:03:37 AM:
>
>> So, I am looking for technical reasons why this is permitted.
>
> Vlad,
> Is there a technical reason to disallow it? Rather than
> anticipate all the possible uses for a machine, it's, of course,
> generally b
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 10/29/2007 11:03:37 AM:
> So, I am looking for technical reasons why this is permitted.
Vlad,
Is there a technical reason to disallow it? Rather than
anticipate all the possible uses for a machine, it's, of course,
generally better to restrict only the things yo
Hi All
Does anyone have a reason why Linux allows one to configure
the same IP or IPv6 address on multiple interfaces?
For IPv4, since linux implements a weak host model, assigning
duplicate addresses doesn't make any sense, since the addresses
really belong to the host and not the interface.
Fo
