Re: [linux] Re: [newbie] Faulty memory for the second time

2003-02-07 Thread et
On Friday 07 February 2003 09:12 am, Vaessen, E.M.J. (Ed) wrote: > > in the "screw me once, same on you, screw me twice, shame on > > me" vein, why in > > the name of fsck would you be going there a third time? > > Since I spent over 3000 EURO there in 2.5 year... > > And the fact that I once conta

RE: [linux] Re: [newbie] Faulty memory for the second time

2003-02-07 Thread Vaessen, E.M.J. (Ed)
> > in the "screw me once, same on you, screw me twice, shame on > me" vein, why in > the name of fsck would you be going there a third time? > Since I spent over 3000 EURO there in 2.5 year... And the fact that I once contacted Dell Netherlands to ask if they could me a PC with Linux on it. A

Re: [linux] Re: [newbie] Faulty memory for the second time

2003-02-07 Thread et
On Friday 07 February 2003 08:37 am, Vaessen, E.M.J. (Ed) wrote: > > -Oorspronkelijk bericht- > > Van: Richard Urwin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Verzonden: vrijdag 7 februari 2003 14:10 > > Aan: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > > Onderwerp: RE: [linux] R

RE: [linux] Re: [newbie] Faulty memory for the second time

2003-02-07 Thread Vaessen, E.M.J. (Ed)
> -Oorspronkelijk bericht- > Van: Richard Urwin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Verzonden: vrijdag 7 februari 2003 14:10 > Aan: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > Onderwerp: RE: [linux] Re: [newbie] Faulty memory for the second time > > > >> after one or

RE: [linux] Re: [newbie] Faulty memory for the second time

2003-02-07 Thread Richard Urwin
>> after one or two weeks of use, >> the memory check indicates errors in the memory module. > this sounds to me a > lot like a static electricty problem. I agree, failure after one or two weeks is a classic symptom of static damage. Get yourself a wrist-strap and use it. Also how do the staff