Re: [newbie] [OT?]Replacement of GnuPG keys

2003-11-30 Thread Charlie Mahan
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Sunday 30 November 2003 12:13 pm, Melissa Reese wrote: > Hi Charlie, > > It should, however, be noted that only the *non-default* type of > ElGamal signing keys are affected by the vulnerability. If someone > created only the standard DH/DSS type key

Re: [newbie] [OT?]Replacement of GnuPG keys

2003-11-30 Thread Melissa Reese
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Charlie, On Sunday, November 30, 2003, at 10:33:27 AM PST, you wrote: > Since the security alert from this week recommended revocation and > replacement of encryption keys I figured I'd just let the list know > my keys are changed now. [snip] >

[newbie] [OT?]Replacement of GnuPG keys

2003-11-30 Thread Charlie Mahan
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Howdy; Since the security alert from this week recommended revocation and replacement of encryption keys I figured I'd just let the list know my keys are changed now. My public key is available at the usual places hkp://blackhole.pca.dfn.de hkp://pg