On Saturday 27 November 2004 08:52 am, JoeHill wrote:
> > which is forwarding all my spam that I receive at my EL address to EL's
> > junkmail address. I guess its possible that I don't have much else to
> > do with it except possibly add in the procmail call?
>
> Okay, you just zoomed right by m
On Fri, 26 Nov 2004 19:19:23 -0600
Chris disseminated the following:
> Joe, let me ask you at least one more question, I've got postfix working in
> this manner:
>
> Nov 26 19:00:02 cpollock postfix/nqmgr[2195]: 3D2E3584005:
> from=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, size=5272, nrcpt=1 (queue active)
> Nov 26
On Friday 26 November 2004 06:56 pm, JoeHill wrote:
> Postfix does not add much 'overhead' to the process, in fact the
> anti-spam processing is going to take up a lot more. Why not save
> yourself the headaches and go with a process that works off the bat?
>
> Postfix also gives you the opportuni
On Fri, 26 Nov 2004 19:01:39 -0600
Chris disseminated the following:
> kdeinit: dcopserver --nosid --suicide?
I wouldn't touch anything that begins with a 'K' if you paid me ;-) I *am*
encouraged by kdeinit committing suicide, it's finally realized it has no reason
to live.
Go here:
http://www
On Friday 26 November 2004 06:56 pm, JoeHill wrote:
> Sorry, I'm not familiar with how this would work with skipping the
> Postfix step in the process.
>
> Perhaps KMail isn't seeing the mail in /var/spool/mail/chris as new mail,
> and so is not delivering it to your inbox? Also, check in the KMai
On Fri, 26 Nov 2004 18:22:09 -0600
Chris disseminated the following:
> > Now whats wrongback to having kmail check until I get this straight.
>
> I'll reply to my own msg here since I did notice one thing amiss, normal
> messages have a 'Status: R, this one I see has a Status: U, meaning
>
On Friday 26 November 2004 06:10 pm, Chris wrote:
> Status: U
> Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Now whats wrongback to having kmail check until I get this straight.
I'll reply to my own msg here since I did notice one thing amiss, normal
messages have a 'Status: R, this one I see has a
On Friday 26 November 2004 05:23 pm, JoeHill wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Nov 2004 16:22:11 -0600
> Fetchmail is pretty simple. Install it, run 'fetchmailconf', yer done. If
> you have Postfix installed ('urpmi postfix' if you don't), then you've
> already arrived at the point where you can start the anti-
On Friday 26 November 2004 23:23, JoeHill wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Nov 2004 16:22:11 -0600
>
> Chris disseminated the following:
> > Realizing this is OT, I'm confused and have some questions. If someone
> > can help please mail me off list as I don't want to get the current list
> > Nazi after me :)
>
On Fri, 26 Nov 2004 16:22:11 -0600
Chris disseminated the following:
> Realizing this is OT, I'm confused and have some questions. If someone can
> help please mail me off list as I don't want to get the current list Nazi
> after me :)
I don't see this as OT at all, though it's been covered qu
Realizing this is OT, I'm confused and have some questions. If someone can
help please mail me off list as I don't want to get the current list Nazi
after me :)
--
Chris
Registered Linux User 283774 http://counter.li.org
4:19pm up 22 days, 20:47, 2 users, load average: 0.05, 0.12, 0.15
~~~
11 matches
Mail list logo
