On Friday 17 January 2003 02:42 am, you wrote:
> Anne Wilson wrote:
> >On Friday 17 Jan 2003 2:19 am, Les Henderson wrote:
> >>I'm curious as to why someone would choose mandrake over other distros
> >
> >For me, a straightforward install that recognised all the hardware I need
> > on a regular bas
Anne Wilson wrote:
On Friday 17 Jan 2003 2:19 am, Les Henderson wrote:
I'm curious as to why someone would choose mandrake over other distros
For me, a straightforward install that recognised all the hardware I need on a
regular basis (despite problems with camera and smartmedia reader
On Friday 17 Jan 2003 2:19 am, Les Henderson wrote:
> I'm curious as to why someone would choose mandrake over other distros
For me, a straightforward install that recognised all the hardware I need on a
regular basis (despite problems with camera and smartmedia reader), and,
above all, this li
Hi my 2 cents
I started out with Redhat 6 at work and upgraded to 6.2
At home I kept upgrading Redhat until the 7 series when I tried debian,
a distro which looked amazing but which required to much time to
install.
I then tried SuSe but just plain didn't like it. The gui, the
installation, I neve
On Thursday 16 January 2003 06:02 pm, Damian Gatabria wrote:
> > btw, i'm looking for actual comparisions about what are the features that
> > you like about it, not just flat out oppinions that mandrake rocks. i
> > hope that this isn't too off topic.
>
> Well, first of all, Mandrake 7.1 was my f
>
> btw, i'm looking for actual comparisions about what are the features that
> you like about it, not just flat out oppinions that mandrake rocks. i
> hope that this isn't too off topic.
Well, first of all, Mandrake 7.1 was my first Linux download.
Besides that, i had three other discs (obtaine
