Hello,
I know this may be an old problem. When I use gcc to compile a cpp
file, the error occur: installation problem, cannot find 'cc1plus' ..
I have searched the solution with google. I know it is related to
the 'gcc-cpp*' package. When I tried to installed that package, I get
the message
Guess Who
:>>>>>>>>>
Best Regards
Tomas Tudja
- Original Message -
From: "Lee Wiggers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2004 7:05 PM
Subject: Re: [newbie] GCC version
> On Wed, 28 Jul 2004 16
On Wed, 28 Jul 2004 16:50:51 +0200
Ger Schinkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wednesday 28 July 2004 15:08, Joseph Gregory Croes wrote:
> > Hallo,
> > guys
> > What is the kernel and gcc version for VMware
> > 4.05. Because I try to make vmware run on my machine. I have
> > Mandrake 10.0 powerp
Hallo, guys
What is the kernel and gcc version for VMware 4.05. Because I try to make vmware run on my machine. I have Mandrake 10.0 powerpack (kernel version 2.6 and gcc version 3.2)
Thanks,
GregoryAdd photos to your e-mail with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*.
_
On Fri, 20 Jun 2003 20:31:20 -0600
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi ;
> I downladed this (gcc-3.3.tar.bz2) from a mirror site in minneapolis. But
> how do i access it? I want to have c, c++, compilers to compile programs.
> I've tried tar, gzip, gunzip, etc, nothing seems to work. It's on my
> des
m
My Cartoon Orbit Fan Page
http://orbiters.funurl.com
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2003 20:31:20 -0600
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [newbie] gcc-3.3.tar.bz2
>
> Hi ;
> I downladed this (gcc-3.3.tar.bz2) from a mirror site i
Hi ;
I downladed this (gcc-3.3.tar.bz2) from a mirror site in minneapolis. But
how do i access it? I want to have c, c++, compilers to compile programs.
I've tried tar, gzip, gunzip, etc, nothing seems to work. It's on my
desktop.
Thanx for your help again.
Ib
"Convictions are more dan
On Sun, 2003-01-19 at 08:03, Ralph Slooten wrote:
> On 19 Jan 2003 07:43:13 +1100
> Stephen Kuhn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Well, being that libs need includes and the includes are dependent on
> > libs, that is the only option that I'd see - unless there is a way to
> > set gcc's search ord
On 19 Jan 2003 07:43:13 +1100
Stephen Kuhn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, being that libs need includes and the includes are dependent on
> libs, that is the only option that I'd see - unless there is a way to
> set gcc's search order for includes...and I'm not sure on that one,
> but will dig
On Sun, 2003-01-19 at 07:37, Ralph Slooten wrote:
> On 19 Jan 2003 07:00:05 +1100
> Stephen Kuhn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > What if you change the order in your /etc/ld.so.conf - rerun ldconfig
> > and see if that affects change?
> >
> > I've not seen that particular error before - and comp
On 19 Jan 2003 07:00:05 +1100
Stephen Kuhn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What if you change the order in your /etc/ld.so.conf - rerun ldconfig
> and see if that affects change?
>
> I've not seen that particular error before - and compile most of my
> proggies by hand...maybe it has something to do
Hi there all,
Often when I'm compiling programs, I get a warbningfrom gcc:
cc1: warning: changing search order for system directory
"/usr/local/include"
cc1: warning: as it has already been specified as a non-system
directory
It seems gcc (or another program) is giving /usr/local as the first
I had very problems with gcc 2.96 and gcc 3.0 at time. The kernel compilation never
funtion. The only solution was delete gcc 3.0
Peter Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
I have a driver package for my intel 536EP modem which contains a cor binary compiled with gcc2.96.
I tried to install gcc2.
I have a driver package for my intel 536EP modem
which contains a cor binary compiled with gcc2.96.
I tried to install gcc2.96 to compile this package
but received the following error message:-
file /etc/colorgccrc from install of
gcc2.96-colorgcc-2.96-0.80mdk conflicts with file from packa
We have done some more work on this. We re-installed Mandrake and did NOT
install any of the development packages. No gcc was installed at all at that
point. Then we went back and selected the development group and accepted the
default values for the packages (gcc2.96). We did not select the "othe
Matt Dalen wrote:
>
>> insmod is used for loading kernel modules. That means you need to be
>> in root mode and logged to /usr/src/linux and
>>
>> make mrproper
>> make deps
>> make modules install
>>
>> (and of course hello.c would have to be added to the kernel modules
>> source code and app
Matt Dalen wrote:
>I've been trying to compile a simple module, but I've been having
>trouble with GCC. I input:
>
>gcc -c hello.c
>insmod hello.o
>
>and it outputs an error message, saying that hello.o was compiled for
>kernel version 2.4.18, and that I'm using kernel version 2.4.18-6mdk.
>Does
On Saturday 12 January 2002 06:23, you wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I wrote a while ago about problems I was having
> w/ the GCC / CC compilers and I still can't get it to
> work.
>
> I checked my /usr/bin directories as people have
> suggested and I see the files are still there. When I
> do
Hello,
I wrote a while ago about problems I was having
w/ the GCC / CC compilers and I still can't get it to
work.
I checked my /usr/bin directories as people have
suggested and I see the files are still there. When I
do an ls in the /usr/bin directory, I get the
following:
g
On Tuesday 08 January 2002 05:53, you wrote:
> when I try to cuse cc or gcc from a command line, I
> get "no such file or directory". When I go to my
> usr/bin directory and do an ls cc, I get the
> following: cc@
>
> I try compiling directly in the /usr/bin directory
> (which shouldn't be nece
On Mon, 7 Jan 2002 22:11:11 -0800 (PST)
Pauljames Dimitriu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for the prompt reply.
>
> I did an ls -l gcc and all the permissions are
> set correctly:
>
> -rwxrwxrwx . gcc
>
> maybe it died. Where can I get another copy w/o
>
Hi,
Thanks for the prompt reply.
I did an ls -l gcc and all the permissions are
set correctly:
-rwxrwxrwx . gcc
maybe it died. Where can I get another copy w/o
reinstalling Linux?
--- "Anuerin G.Diaz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 7 Jan 2002 21:53:09 -080
On Mon, 7 Jan 2002 21:53:09 -0800 (PST)
Pauljames Dimitriu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> when I try to cuse cc or gcc from a command line, I
> get "no such file or directory". When I go to my
> usr/bin directory and do an ls cc, I get the
> following: cc@
>
> PS: g++ works just fine. I would
On Mon, 7 Jan 2002 21:53:09 -0800 (PST)
Pauljames Dimitriu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> when I try to cuse cc or gcc from a command line, I
> get "no such file or directory". When I go to my
> usr/bin directory and do an ls cc, I get the
> following: cc@
>
> I try compiling directly in the /u
when I try to cuse cc or gcc from a command line, I
get "no such file or directory". When I go to my
usr/bin directory and do an ls cc, I get the
following: cc@
I try compiling directly in the /usr/bin directory
(which shouldn't be necessary) and I still get the
same error.
Any ideas?
Thanks
fixed it. i'm using egcs now. didn't work earlier because i hadn't installed
egcs-cpp.
mik
On Monday 01 October 2001 20:20, you wrote:
> replying to my own message:
> c++ is a link to g++, so it doesn't work with g++ either.
>
> mik
>
> &would it be alright then if i made a link from c++ to g+
on 10/1/01 10:05 AM, mik at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> hi,
>
> maybe this is more of a question for the expert, but anyways: what's the
> deal with gcc-c++?. everytime i try to compile a c++ program i get messages
> like "c headers not found" (while running configure) or "strcomp not
> defined"
hi,
maybe this is more of a question for the expert, but anyways: what's the
deal with gcc-c++?. everytime i try to compile a c++ program i get messages
like "c headers not found" (while running configure) or "strcomp not
defined" (while compiling). in some cases i've been able to fix the by usin
The Mandrake 8.0 GCC is not the same as the unstable GCC used in Red
Hat 7.0 and 7.1. Unfortunately, for technical reasons, the Mandrake
developers decided to use the same version number as Red Hat used for
their GCC (2.96), creating heaps of confusion in the process. Mandrake
have been compil
I've heard and read rumors that the version of gcc included in Mandrake 8.0
is bad. As evidence I recently upgraded my nvidia video driver and had to
compile it about 50 times before the module would successfully load. Has
anyone else heard, read, or otherwise experienced the same?
I downloaded LM 8 when it first came out, and installed it on three
computers: mine, my roommate's laptop, and my roommate's desktop. The two
desktop computers are P3 450s with over 128 MB of RAM. The laptop is a P3
mobile 700 (I think that's the clock speed) with 128 MB of RAM. Anyway, the
instal
I'm trying to compile PostgreSQL and I get the following error :
checking for gccgcc
checking whether the C compiler works (gcc -02) worksyes
checking whether the C compiler (gcc -02) is a cross compilerno
checking whether we are using GNU C yes
checking whether gcc accepts
On Thursday 31 May 2001 23:53, you wrote:
> I just curious about the gcc 2.96 packaged with Mandrake 8.0, is it stable
> ? because the "history" of gcc 2.96 packaged with redhat 7.0 was not good
> right ?
Well, the number 2.96 was abandoned by the gcc team. We used it to identify
our pruning f
I just curious about the gcc 2.96 packaged with Mandrake 8.0, is it stable ?
because the "history" of gcc 2.96 packaged with redhat 7.0 was not good right
?
Barbara,
The compiler is telling you it's confused and doesn't know for certain
whether it's supposed to do the job or not. Open the file Makefile and
check to make sure which compiler is being referenced in the file. specify
either gcc or g++.
--
Mark
*
"what knowledge I have managed to
I was trying to configure ddd and while running configure, I got this error
checking whether the C++ compiler (c++) compiles a simple program... no
configure: error: You must set the environment variable CXX to a working
C++ compiler. Also check the CXXFLAGS settings.
good luck,
ralph
>From: "T-Bond" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: [newbie] gcc
>Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2001 15:29:14 -0800
>
>Hi
>I got the same problem. That pa
t;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Friday, March 23, 2001 2:03 PM
> Subject: Re: [newbie] gcc
>
>
> > On Friday 23 March 2001 11:03 am, Ralph Frisbie wrote:
> > > I'm trying to use gcc with LInuxMandrake 7.2 in a C++ class. The linker
>
rpm -q gcc-c++ reports that that rpm is loaded.
>From: Kelley Terry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: [newbie] gcc
>Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2001 15:03:25 -0700
>
>On Friday 23 March 2001 11:03 am, Ralph Frisbie wrote
nce to
'ostream::operator<<(char const *)'
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
Any ideas what is wrong?
- Original Message -
From: "Kelley Terry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, March 23, 2001 2:03 PM
Subject: Re: [newbie
On Friday 23 March 2001 11:03 am, Ralph Frisbie wrote:
> I'm trying to use gcc with LInuxMandrake 7.2 in a C++ class. The linker is
> failing to find the library containg cout, iostream, cin,
> etc. Compile is clean, header file available, but link fails.
> A simple hello world c program runs
Thanks.
--- Kevin_Bergner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> type
>
> ./a.out
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> Robert Reed
> Sent: Monday, February 26, 2001 10:52 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTEC
yes, try "./a.out"
The problem is that your home directory is not in your PATH
- Original Message -
From: "Robert Reed" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2001 1:52 AM
Subject: [newbie] GCC
> Hello, I j
type
./a.out
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Robert Reed
Sent: Monday, February 26, 2001 10:52 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [newbie] GCC
Hello, I just installed Linux today, and then
installed the gcc compiler, and its
Hello, I just installed Linux today, and then
installed the gcc compiler, and its dependencies. I
built a simple program hello.c:
#include
main()
{
printf("Hello World\n");
return 0;
}
After writing that, I compiled the code using:
gcc hello.c
I tried running it by typing:
a.out
And it ju
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> On Sunday 14 January 2001 01:08 pm, lll wrote:
> > ok ithink thats the problem i cant find the gcc is not in /bin an
> > when i use the package tool an watch the file list there is none like
> > gcc in /bin what can i do without gcc?
> > is there other compilator? an
On Sunday 14 January 2001 01:08 pm, lll wrote:
> ok ithink thats the problem i cant find the gcc is not in /bin an
> when i use the package tool an watch the file list there is none like
> gcc in /bin what can i do without gcc?
> is there other compilator? an y is not there in the mandrake the gcc
Hi
to find out if you have gcc, type "gcc -v" minus
the quotes of course at the prompt in console mode. If you get a version, then
you have it.
James
- Original Message -
From:
lll
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 15, 2001 5:08
AM
Subjec
ok ithink thats the problem i cant find the gcc is
not in /bin an when i use the package tool an watch the file list there is none
like gcc in /bin
what can i do without gcc?
is there other compilator? an y is not there in the
mandrake the gcc?
im sure i installed it..
On Wednesday 10 January 2001 15:20, you wrote:
> Hi all, I have installed some programs which use X11 and a compilation with
> gcc, I know, uses the option -lX11 to compiler look for libX11.so, which is
> in the /usr/include directory! OK!
Actually, the libX11.so won't be in /usr/include, but in
Hi all, I have installed some programs which use X11 and a compilation with
gcc, I know, uses the option -lX11 to compiler look for libX11.so, which is
in the /usr/include directory! OK!
A program with #include atline 38 is my problem, the header file
is located in /usr/X11R6/include/,
On Sunday 31 December 2000 10:46 pm, Abraham Mandac wrote:
> Thanks, Tom. I've come accross google being recommended several times
> already on this list. I've never tried it. I guess I should before
> asking the following question, but I'll ask anyway :) Is it more, uh,
> linux-oriented than Yaho
Thanks, Tom. I've come accross google being recommended several times
already on this list. I've never tried it. I guess I should before asking
the following question, but I'll ask anyway :) Is it more, uh,
linux-oriented than Yahoo, Lycos and the like?
-- Abe
At 06:49 PM 12/30/00 -0600, you
Abraham Mandac wrote:
>
> At 11:04 AM 12/31/00 -0500, you wrote:
> >Abraham Mandac wrote:
> > >
> > > Can someone point me to a gcc tutorial [on the internet or a good book]?
> > > I find the man pages a bit overwhelming as yet.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Abe
> >
> >Hello Abe,
> >
> >I found a lot
At 11:04 AM 12/31/00 -0500, you wrote:
>Abraham Mandac wrote:
> >
> > Can someone point me to a gcc tutorial [on the internet or a good book]?
> > I find the man pages a bit overwhelming as yet.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Abe
>
>Hello Abe,
>
>I found a lot of good books through a good web page at:
>http:
Abraham Mandac wrote:
>
> Can someone point me to a gcc tutorial [on the internet or a good book]?
> I find the man pages a bit overwhelming as yet.
>
> Thanks,
> Abe
Hello Abe,
I found a lot of good books through a good web page at:
http:/www.informit.com
They allow you to review portions of
Abraham Mandac wrote:
>
> Can someone point me to a gcc tutorial [on the internet or a good book]?
> I find the man pages a bit overwhelming as yet.
>
> Thanks,
> Abe
go to http://www.howstuffworks.com/
on their search engine, type in 'c programming'.
that will lead you to their c tutorial, w
On Saturday 30 December 2000 04:45 am, Abraham Mandac wrote:
> Can someone point me to a gcc tutorial [on the internet or a good
> book]? I find the man pages a bit overwhelming as yet.
>
> Thanks,
> Abe
go to Google and search 'gcc tutorial', it'll return 35,000 links,
some which might be us
Can someone point me to a gcc tutorial [on the internet or a good book]?
I find the man pages a bit overwhelming as yet.
Thanks,
Abe
On Fri, 8 Dec 2000, Tw|sT wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've just subscribed (and installed Mandrake).. and I have a problem, I am
> doing a project for uni and I need to compile C++ programs... but I cannot
> gcc keeps complaining about an some sort of call to cin or cout... It isn't
> a coding problem caus
Hi,
I've just subscribed (and installed Mandrake).. and I have a problem, I am
doing a project for uni and I need to compile C++ programs... but I cannot
gcc keeps complaining about an some sort of call to cin or cout... It isn't
a coding problem cause I've tried to compile a simple hello program
On Monday 20 November 2000 11:37 am, Colm Harrington wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I'm a newcomer to linux and have just insralled mandrake 7.0 on my
> computer. I am a programming student and one of my main uses is gcc.
> My problem is that gcc cannot seem to find any header files that i
> #include at the
Hi All,
I'm a newcomer to linux and have just insralled mandrake 7.0 on my computer.
I am a programming student and one of my main uses is gcc.
My problem is that gcc cannot seem to find any header files that i #include
at the top of my program.
Any info on how to solve this would be greatly appr
All right, I'm stuck... After installing the GCC 2.95.2 package and thinking
everything was hunky-dorey, I can't even compile a simple 1-line C program.
/usr/bin/ld is complaining about crt1.o. What is crt1.o and collect2?? The output
from my compilation is below:
cc -o test test.c
/usr/bi
Hello, I am having problems when using the
./configure command. I am receiving an error that says
configure:error: installation or configuration
problem: C compiler cannot create executables.
has anyone had this type of error before and what
needs to be done?
Math lib is not included in standard C lib. You need to link to it
specifically. Use
gcc -lm sample.c
On Fri, 21 Jul 2000, Sergey Panasyuk wrote:
> Hi, I am trying to compile some c code and have problems with gcc.
> This is my code saved as sample.c
> #include
> #include
>
> int main
Type "g++ math.c" and it should compile just fine. gcc gives me errors,
but g++ doesn't.
> Hi, I am trying to compile some c code and have problems with gcc.
> This is my code saved as sample.c
> #include
> #include
>
> int main(void)
> {
> printf("%f", sin(3.14));
> }
>
> then at terminal I
On Fri, 21 Jul 2000, Sergey Panasyuk wrote:
Dear Sergey,
You are right, it is not linked properly. You have to designate the math
library for gcc.
What i mean is:
gcc myprogram.c -lm
after this in a.out you will have the binary code.
Best wishes,
Gabor
> Hi, I am trying to compile some c
Sent: Monday, July 03, 2000 6:24 AM
Subject: Re: [newbie] gcc can't find the header files
> On Sun, 02 Jul 2000, you wrote:
> > I installed gcc from the Mandrake 7.0 CD and the
> > header files were put into /usr/i386-glibc-linux/include/
> > but when I compile a C progra
On Sun, 02 Jul 2000, you wrote:
> I installed gcc from the Mandrake 7.0 CD and the
> header files were put into /usr/i386-glibc-linux/include/
> but when I compile a C program I get an error saying
> "Cannot find stdio.h".
>
> I have put /usr/i386-glibc-linux/include in my PATH
> but it hasn't h
I installed gcc from the Mandrake 7.0 CD and the
header files were put into /usr/i386-glibc-linux/include/
but when I compile a C program I get an error saying
"Cannot find stdio.h".
I have put /usr/i386-glibc-linux/include in my PATH
but it hasn't helped.which makes me wonder what the
PATH vari
On Sat, 03 Jun 2000, you wrote:
> ColinI don't use Kmail, so I don't know if it has a
> setting you can use to fix the problem, but the mail client I
> use (Netscape Messenger) has a feature that I set to 'wrap
> incoming messages to window width.'
I don't see that feature in the kmail (Ver
ColinI don't use Kmail, so I don't know if it has a
setting you can use to fix the problem, but the mail client I
use (Netscape Messenger) has a feature that I set to 'wrap
incoming messages to window width.'
What the person sending that type of message (one with no
width formatting include
On Thu, 01 Jun 2000, John Couturier wrote:
> Interesting I just downloaded ksnuffle and it compiled and ran perfectly. I have
>gcc 2.95.3 I downloaded the source RPM from the cooker site and rebuilt the whole gcc
>suite and installed it. I also did that with glibc-2.1.3. So it could be that l
Interesting I just downloaded ksnuffle and it compiled and ran perfectly. I have gcc
2.95.3 I downloaded the source RPM from the cooker site and rebuilt the whole gcc
suite and installed it. I also did that with glibc-2.1.3. So it could be that last
.3 in my gcc or possible glibc that makes
On Wed, 31 May 2000, Dan Ferris wrote:
>HOWEVER, the stinking autoconf configure scripts still find and
>use gcc.
>
>I don't know that much about the differences between egcs and gcc
>except that egcs is used by Red Hat, and gcc is used by
>Mandrake.
>
>So, here is the burning questionHow
This came to my attention after fighting ksnuffle for a week
trying to get it to compile. So in frustration, I wrote to the
developer of ksnuffle and was told that the problem stems from
the fact that gcc 2.95 does not like me.
Since that time, I have tried to compile multiple apps/utilities
o
As long as its a Hard Drive ...I dont think there is a problem :)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >
> > Went through last night and reinstalled Linux using different
> > hard drive set just to see if it would clear up the gcc problem.
>
> Does anybody know if MDK 7.0 supports Seagate hard drives?
BillMDK 7.0 is operating from my Seagate 9.1 gig scsi
drive right now.
Alan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >
> > Went through last night and reinstalled Linux using different
> > hard drive set just to see if it would clear up the gcc problem.
>
> Does anybody know if MDK 7.0 supports Seag
David Ramsey wrote:
>
> [snip]
> pretty much select any package you want. And then it seems that it will
> make all the required entries in the environment and required symbolic
> links. Otherwise, if you just install the RPM file, it does not.
Please understand that the only thing the installer
>
> Went through last night and reinstalled Linux using different
> hard drive set just to see if it would clear up the gcc problem.
Does anybody know if MDK 7.0 supports Seagate hard drives?
Thanks,
BG
. Otherwise, if you just install the RPM file, it does not.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: James McLaughlin [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 03, 2000 4:53 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:[newbie] GCC...where are you???
I am going to grab all of the files that
On Thu, 4 May 2000, Michael wrote:
>when i type gcc in a terminal window i get gcc.colorgcc: No input files
>
>I would like to be able to use the Gnu C++ compiler for a course in c programming
>
> and don't know how to get the darn thing to cooperate to where i can even do a hello
>world!
It mi
I'm doing some learning myself, and someone
directed me to 'man gcc' and 'man g++'; that helped me a lot.
For a 'hello world' c++ program, save the file as
helloworld.cpp then run 'g++ -o helloworld helloworld.cpp' (the first
helloworld being the executable file that you want to cr
ne
easy.
Regards,
Nathan
- Original Message -
From:
Michael
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 04, 2000 5:38
AM
Subject: Re: [newbie] GCC...where are
you???
when i type gcc in a terminal window i get gcc.colorgcc: No input filesI would like to be able to use the G
You have to specifiy what files you want to compile. So the correct usage would
be something like "gcc -o executable_name source_code_name.c" Or for your
Hello World, "gcc -o helloworld helloworld.c". See "man gcc" for more info on
all the options.
>
> when i type gcc in a terminal window i get
ednesday, May 03, 2000 5:59 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:[newbie] GCC is missingg
I am wondering why every time I attempt to compile something I continue to
get errrors about my gcc or cc is missing. I am guessing this is my C
compilerI don't get itwhere the he
riginal Message-
From: James McLaughlin [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 03, 2000 4:53 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [newbie] GCC...where are you???
I am going to grab all of the files that are dependant of the gcc rpm and
do
an install today. HOPEFULLY this will w
lto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 03, 2000 4:05 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [newbie] GCC is missingg
A. That might explain my problem! I have been trying to compile Mat
Trace Route. When I do so, the configure script checks for the compiler
GCC, and comes ba
James McLaughlin wrote:
> Hmmm..another question about this whole fiasco. I dled the rpm ...transfered it
> to teh server, and from a ssh sesion I was not able to install the rpm.
> Is this because of security and installs like that can not be made remotly?
> (and is this somethign I would be re
Hmmm..another question about this whole fiasco. I dled the rpm ...transfered it
to teh server, and from a ssh sesion I was not able to install the rpm.
Is this because of security and installs like that can not be made remotly?
(and is this somethign I would be responsible for ?)
Or is it because
gital alarm clock goes off and you think "Bloody Macs!"
===
- Original Message -
From: "Monte Milanuk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2000 10:14 PM
Subject: Re: [newbie] GCC is m
Welcome to one of the 'quirks' of Mandrake 7.0 ( I presume that is what
flavor you have). If I recall, if you don't select 'Custom', and
'Development' during install, or otherwise explicitly specify to install
the compiler, you don't get it. If you are downloading an *.rpm file,
you should be ab
I am wondering why every time I attempt to compile something I continue to
get errrors about my gcc or cc is missing. I am guessing this is my C
compilerI don't get itwhere the hell is it? IF I do a locate I come
up with zilch! Nothing is out there...help..
I am downloading gcc but I
And yet another question. I've downloaded a few programs and tried to install
them to no avail. After I untar the file, I type './configure'. There is some
activity, and then a message that states the following:
loading cache ./config.cache
checking for gcc... gcc
checking whether the C compiler
Right on, Anthony! I just ran into the same type of problem trying to compile a
driver for my NIC. I
hope the Mandrake folks read your (our) messages.
Anthony Huereca wrote:
> Looks like you dont' have all the libraries installed. Go to /usr/include and
> see if stdio.h is there. If it's not,
Looks like you dont' have all the libraries installed. Go to /usr/include and
see if stdio.h is there. If it's not, then you'll need to download an RPM of
whatever header files you need, like
http://rpmfind.net/linux/RPM/mandrake/cooker/cooker/Mandrake/RPMS/glibc-devel-2.1.3-2mdk.i586.html
for s
I've installed Mandrake 7..0 and now I am attemtpting to setup Samba. However,
when I run ./configure, I get the following messages:
checing for gcc...no
checking for cc...no
no acceptable cc found in $PATH
I have modifed my path a number of times, adding path's to where I believe the
GCC compi
Hi Ronald,
I don't know I've development files for gcc/g++ or not, I installed mandrake
7.0 by choosing the recommended option from an iso file downloaded from web
site and burn into a CD while I was in Windows98.
If this option don't include the development files please point me to where
I c
Do you have the development rpms installed for gcc/g++???
On Sat, 5 Feb 2000, Alan Tam wrote:
> Hi all,
> I am new to Linux and have just installed Mandrake 7.0
> When I try to compile Hello World as a C++ program in
> Code Crusader, gcc compliants about missing iostream.h
>
> =
1 - 100 of 126 matches
Mail list logo
