On Thu, 2 Dec 2004 10:33:00 -0500 (EST), Kenneth Rhodes
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> This may not be what you want to hear.
>
> I was able, after much effort, to get my Alacatel Speedtouch USB ADSL modem
> working under Mandrake 9.2. When I upgraded to Mandrake 10.0 registered
> addition
> I
This may not be what you want to hear.
I was able, after much effort, to get my Alacatel Speedtouch USB ADSL modem
working under Mandrake 9.2. When I upgraded to Mandrake 10.0 registered
addition
I was never able to "connect" again, despite a month or so of efforts by
support staff at mandrakee
Hi,
Can somebody help me before I ditch Linux
altogether??
I have just installed 10.1CE, and it looks very
nice etc, but as usual, I am having trouble getting it onto the web with my
speedtouch USB ADSL modem.
Mandrake was fine up until 10OE, and it just
wouldnt work. I tried various m
> If
> Konqueror (gecko) would get it's javascript right I'd never even
> contemplate another browser.
Konq isn't based on gecko, is it?
eric
--
Mandrake HowTo's & More: http://twiki.mdklinuxfaq.org
Want to buy your Pack or Services
On Saturday 02 October 2004 02:25, H.J.Bathoorn wrote:
> On Saturday 02 October 2004 01:45, Kaj Haulrich wrote:
> > IMHO Opera is one of the finest
> > examples of commercial software living in harmony with the free
> > (as in speech) community.
>
> Kaj,
> Your opinion means a great deal to me and
On Sat, 2 Oct 2004 08:07, Paul Kaplan wrote:
> My initial impression is that 10.1CE is faster than 10.0 Official. Can
> anyone confirm or would people like a sample of what I've been smokin'?
> Paul
Yeah, gotta agree, it is faster on my laptop, they seem to have tweaked my hdd
properly, and the
On Sat, 2 Oct 2004 02:25:03 +0200
H.J.Bathoorn disseminated the following:
> especially the seamless transition to ftp client and file browser is col;)
Ya! Just like Internet Exploder!
Heh, sorry, couldn't resist the KDE jab. Goes against the UNIX philosophy, one
tool that does one job
On Saturday 02 October 2004 01:45, Kaj Haulrich wrote:
> IMHO Opera is one of the finest
> examples of commercial software living in harmony with the free (as
> in speech) community.
Kaj,
Your opinion means a great deal to me and I agree.
Opera though, has a too cluttered interface to appeal to me
On Saturday 02 October 2004 00:55, H.J.Bathoorn wrote:
> On Saturday 02 October 2004 00:44, Kaj Haulrich wrote:
> > ÂFurthermore, Firefox and Opera works just perfect
> > including *anti-aliasing*.
>
> I just did the clean install but for the lif of me can't find
> opera:( It's the only browser tha
Paul Kaplan wrote:
My initial impression is that 10.1CE is faster than 10.0 Official. Can anyone
confirm or would people like a sample of what I've been smokin'?
Paul
I don't see too much difference. I does seem to me though that XFree
was faster then Xorg.
_
On Saturday 02 October 2004 00:44, Kaj Haulrich wrote:
> Furthermore, Firefox and Opera works just perfect
> including *anti-aliasing*.
I just did the clean install but for the lif of me can't find opera:(
It's the only browser that allows me to pay international bills with my bank.
javascript!
On Saturday 02 October 2004 00:12, H.J.Bathoorn wrote:
> On Saturday 02 October 2004 00:07, Paul Kaplan wrote:
> > My initial impression is that 10.1CE is faster than 10.0
> > Official. Can anyone confirm or would people like a sample of
> > what I've been smokin'? Paul
>
> I just did a clean inst
On Sat, 02 Oct 2004 08:37:31 +1000
> ...have you moved next door or downwind of JoeHill?
LOL! Nah, he'd be comatose were that the case...
--
JoeHill RLU / #282046 / www.freeyourmachine.org
18:42:47 up 58 days, 18:30, 7 users, load average: 1.18, 1.28, 1.29
+++
"Wealth is
On Saturday 02 October 2004 00:18, Lanman wrote:
> Of course, by the
> time a new one is almost ready for release, the previous version always
> seems to be a tad slower, so it's either great timing or they're doing
> it on purpose! Hmmm,...a conspiracy maybe?
Eh?
I thought we all lived by the cre
On Sat, 2004-10-02 at 08:07, Paul Kaplan wrote:
> My initial impression is that 10.1CE is faster than 10.0 Official. Can anyone
> confirm or would people like a sample of what I've been smokin'?
> Paul
...have you moved next door or downwind of JoeHill?
--
stephen kuhn
_
On Sat, 2 Oct 2004 00:12:25 +0200
H.J.Bathoorn disseminated the following:
> .I'll go for the sample methinks:)
Moi aussi!
--
JoeHill RLU / #282046 / www.freeyourmachine.org
18:32:50 up 58 days, 18:20, 6 users, load average: 1.29, 1.37, 1.30
+++
Rule $19.99 (Brad `Squid'
Paul Kaplan wrote:
My initial impression is that 10.1CE is faster than 10.0 Official. Can anyone
confirm or would people like a sample of what I've been smokin'?
Paul
I upgraded from 10.0CE to 10.1CE - can't say if it's any faster, but
it certainly look prettier. If you want me to perform a tru
Paul Kaplan wrote:
My initial impression is that 10.1CE is faster than 10.0 Official. Can anyone
confirm or would people like a sample of what I've been smokin'?
Paul
ROFLMFAO!
Paul, That was definitely very funny! Please don't say funny things
while I have a mouthful of coffee! Now I have to br
On Saturday 02 October 2004 00:07, Paul Kaplan wrote:
> My initial impression is that 10.1CE is faster than 10.0 Official. Can
> anyone confirm or would people like a sample of what I've been smokin'?
> Paul
I just did a clean install of 10.1 and notice no differenceI'll go for the
sample me
My initial impression is that 10.1CE is faster than 10.0 Official. Can anyone
confirm or would people like a sample of what I've been smokin'?
Paul
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Join t
20 matches
Mail list logo
