Re: [newbie] Anyone else used MJPEGTools? - Actually Re: Sig file

2004-01-03 Thread Charlie Mahan
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Saturday 03 January 2004 2:14 pm, Fig ('RL Cassidy') wrote: > How do you get your uptime in your sig file? > Using whatever script you're using to generate your Evolution signature, add this line, leaving out the hash (#) mark: #echo `uptime` Those

Re: [newbie] Anyone else used MJPEGTools? - Actually Re: Sig file

2004-01-03 Thread Fig ('RL Cassidy')
How do you get your uptime in your sig file? Regards; Charlie - -- Edmonton,AB,Canada User #244963 at http://counter.li.org Mandrake Linux release 9.2 (FiveStar) for i586 kernel 2.4.22-21.tmb.1mdk 16:07:40 up 13 days, 1:57, 1 user, load average: 0.03, 0.09, 0.08 There is no TRUTH. There is no REA

Re: [newbie] Anyone else used MJPEGTools?

2004-01-03 Thread JoeHill
On Sat, 03 Jan 2004 03:37:52 -0700 jason pearl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > is it for ripping dvds? The script apparently *will* convert DVD to SVCD or VCD (VCD generally looks like hell), but I haven't tried that yet. There are some basic instructions that come with the script, just run it witho

Re: [newbie] Anyone else used MJPEGTools?

2004-01-02 Thread Charlie Mahan
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Friday 02 January 2004 4:23 pm, JoeHill wrote: > On Fri, 02 Jan 2004 16:19:45 -0700 > > Charlie Mahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > You and I both seem to need to build ourselves new systems, > > ...you got that right. > > 'K, I'll leave well enough a

Re: [newbie] Anyone else used MJPEGTools?

2004-01-02 Thread JoeHill
On Fri, 02 Jan 2004 16:19:45 -0700 Charlie Mahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You and I both seem to need to build ourselves new systems, ...you got that right. 'K, I'll leave well enough alone for now, it being Linux and all, even having my CPU at 99% doesn't seem to interfere with anything els

Re: [newbie] Anyone else used MJPEGTools?

2004-01-02 Thread Charlie Mahan
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Friday 02 January 2004 3:47 pm, JoeHill wrote: > They have i686 RPM's on their site for download, but isn't i686 AMD? i686 is IA32 (Intel Architecture); which means any current Athlon, PIII, P4, Celeron, Duron. The Mandrake rpms are basically as opt

Re: [newbie] Anyone else used MJPEGTools?

2004-01-02 Thread JoeHill
On Sat, 03 Jan 2004 01:04:09 +0200 robin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > No, it's Pentium III and above, IIRC. Hmmm, maybe I'll give those a shot and see if it speeds up the process a little. With my luck, it'll knock it down to *23* hours... -- JoeHill ++ ICQ # 280779813 Registered Linux user #2

Re: [newbie] Anyone else used MJPEGTools?

2004-01-02 Thread robin
JoeHill wrote: [snip] They have i686 RPM's on their site for download, but isn't i686 AMD? No, it's Pentium III and above, IIRC. Sir Robin -- "Certitude is possible for those who only own one encyclopedia." - Robert Anton Wilson Robin Turner IDMYO Bilkent Univeritesi Ankara 06533 Turkey www.bilke

Re: [newbie] Anyone else used MJPEGTools?

2004-01-02 Thread JoeHill
On Fri, 2 Jan 2004 08:38:55 -0700 Jerry Barton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hey Joe, > I'm not sure about the nasm issue but was wondering what command you use > to do the encoding from divx to svcd? I haven't quite figured it out > yet and you're help would be appreciated :-) > I'm not quite s

Re: [newbie] Anyone else used MJPEGTools?

2004-01-02 Thread Jerry Barton
On Fri, 2 Jan 2004 16:44:58 -0500 JoeHill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I use this package as part of a script which converts DivX to SVCD. > The process takes about 24 hours for a 700MB DivX file. > > I've been told that if mjpegtools is built when the 'nasm' package is > present(MMX/SSE optim