On Sat, 20 Dec 2003 03:47 am, many eyes noted that Ronald J. Hall wrote:
> On Friday 19 December 2003 11:18 am, Todd Slater wrote:
> >TS On Fri, Dec 19, 2003 at 10:14:06AM -0500, Ronald J. Hall wrote:
> >TS > On Friday 19 December 2003 09:28 am, Todd Slater wrote:
> >TS >
> >TS > >TS This won'
On Friday 19 December 2003 03:11 pm, Todd Slater wrote:
>TS No prob--I figured it was just a misunderstanding--same happens to me.
>TS Heck, most folks don't understand anything I say anyway! (I have the
>TS unique ability not only to be uncomfortable in social settings but
>TS online as well!
On Fri, Dec 19, 2003 at 11:47:28AM -0500, Ronald J. Hall wrote:
> On Friday 19 December 2003 11:18 am, Todd Slater wrote:
> >TS On Fri, Dec 19, 2003 at 10:14:06AM -0500, Ronald J. Hall wrote:
> >TS > On Friday 19 December 2003 09:28 am, Todd Slater wrote:
> >TS >
> >TS > >TS This won't help yo
On Friday 19 December 2003 11:18 am, Todd Slater wrote:
>TS On Fri, Dec 19, 2003 at 10:14:06AM -0500, Ronald J. Hall wrote:
>TS > On Friday 19 December 2003 09:28 am, Todd Slater wrote:
>TS >
>TS > >TS This won't help you since you can't get into X, but ...
>TS >
>TS > Er...this was from a s
On Fri, Dec 19, 2003 at 10:14:06AM -0500, Ronald J. Hall wrote:
> On Friday 19 December 2003 09:28 am, Todd Slater wrote:
>
> >TS This won't help you since you can't get into X, but ...
>
> Er...this was from a shell. X is irrelevant... :-)
Right, which is why I prefaced my response with
"Th
On Friday 19 December 2003 09:28 am, Todd Slater wrote:
>TS This won't help you since you can't get into X, but ...
Er...this was from a shell. X is irrelevant... :-)
>TS A while back I made a checkinstall rpm for dutree, a du visualization
>TS tool. It's pretty nifty. Screenshot:
>TS http:
On Fri, Dec 19, 2003 at 09:19:21AM -0500, Ronald J. Hall wrote:
> On Thursday 18 December 2003 08:10 pm, Trey Sizemore wrote:
>
> >TS I have gotten rid of some large files in /var/log, /tmp is empty and I
> >TS still have my 5.9G of / used up. Until I can track down where the
> >TS excessively
On Thursday 18 December 2003 08:10 pm, Trey Sizemore wrote:
>TS I have gotten rid of some large files in /var/log, /tmp is empty and I
>TS still have my 5.9G of / used up. Until I can track down where the
>TS excessively large file(s) is/are, I wanted to 'reallocate' some of my
>TS /home part
Trey Sizemore wrote:
Lee Wiggers wrote:
On Wed, 17 Dec 2003 11:19:59 +0200
robin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Derek Jennings wrote:
On Tuesday 16 Dec 2003 4:24 pm, Trey Sizemore wrote:
Computer was working like a champ a few days ago. Tried to
start back>up yesterday and saw o
Lee Wiggers wrote:
On Wed, 17 Dec 2003 11:19:59 +0200
robin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Derek Jennings wrote:
On Tuesday 16 Dec 2003 4:24 pm, Trey Sizemore wrote:
Computer was working like a champ a few days ago. Tried to
start back>up yesterday and saw one of the messages
On Wed, 17 Dec 2003 11:19:59 +0200
robin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Derek Jennings wrote:
> > On Tuesday 16 Dec 2003 4:24 pm, Trey Sizemore wrote:
> >
> >>Computer was working like a champ a few days ago. Tried to
> >start back>up yesterday and saw one of the messages during boot
> >up say som
Derek Jennings wrote:
On Tuesday 16 Dec 2003 4:24 pm, Trey Sizemore wrote:
Computer was working like a champ a few days ago. Tried to start back
up yesterday and saw one of the messages during boot up say something to
the effect of (sorry not in front of the machine now):
No room on / [0] expecti
On Tuesday 16 December 2003 08:35 am, Derek Jennings wrote:
> On Tuesday 16 Dec 2003 4:24 pm, Trey Sizemore wrote:
> > Computer was working like a champ a few days ago. Tried to start back
> > up yesterday and saw one of the messages during boot up say something to
> > the effect of (sorry not in
SNIP
It says that root (/) is full, and the iso images were in /home/trey
so doesn't that count against root or am I having a conceptual error
here. When I get back I'll try to isolate where the space hogs are
using df and du again. I think it was the du command that showed file
sizes but if
Trey Sizemore wrote:
SNIP
It says that root (/) is full, and the iso images were in /home/trey
so doesn't that count against root or am I having a conceptual error
here. When I get back I'll try to isolate where the space hogs are
using df and du again. I think it was the du command that show
Derek Jennings wrote:
On Tuesday 16 Dec 2003 4:24 pm, Trey Sizemore wrote:
Computer was working like a champ a few days ago. Tried to start back
up yesterday and saw one of the messages during boot up say something to
the effect of (sorry not in front of the machine now):
No room on / [0] expe
you can check the free space of youre partitions with
the df conmmand
so you can have an idea if there is a space problem
Cdrack.
--- Trey Sizemore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Computer was working like a champ a few days ago.
> Tried to start back
> up yesterday and saw one of the message
On Tuesday 16 Dec 2003 4:24 pm, Trey Sizemore wrote:
> Computer was working like a champ a few days ago. Tried to start back
> up yesterday and saw one of the messages during boot up say something to
> the effect of (sorry not in front of the machine now):
>
> No room on / [0] expecting [2]
>
Computer was working like a champ a few days ago. Tried to start back
up yesterday and saw one of the messages during boot up say something to
the effect of (sorry not in front of the machine now):
No room on / [0] expecting [2]
I haven't done anything new to the setup or installed/upgrade
19 matches
Mail list logo
