t any
more. :)
-Bill
- Original Message -
From: John Aldrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, October 10, 1999 1:01 PM
Subject: Re: [newbie] Can't run MODEMTOOL
> On Sat, 09 Oct 1999, you wrote:
> > I understand that was what he was doing,
John Aldrich wrote:
>
> On Sat, 09 Oct 1999, you wrote:
> > I understand that was what he was doing, but the ALL CAPS part can make a
> > person feel like they are being yelled at or that he (John) was getting
> > tired of repeating himself, or that the person was ignorant for thinking
> > that M
On Sat, 09 Oct 1999, you wrote:
> I understand that was what he was doing, but the ALL CAPS part can make a
> person feel like they are being yelled at or that he (John) was getting
> tired of repeating himself, or that the person was ignorant for thinking
> that Mandrake was Red Hat. By all mean
On Sat, 09 Oct 1999, you wrote:
> So what if "MANDRAKE IS **NOT** RedHat." I have read some documentation
> that can make a person think that it is, if the documentation isn't
> interpreted correctly. The only reason I am replying to this message is
> because the way it is worded can be taken of
- Original Message -
From: Steve Philp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, October 09, 1999 12:54 PM
Subject: Re: [newbie] Can't run MODEMTOOL
> Bill Munden wrote:
> >
> > So what if "MANDRAKE IS **NOT** RedHat." I have
Bill Munden wrote:
>
> So what if "MANDRAKE IS **NOT** RedHat." I have read some documentation
> that can make a person think that it is, if the documentation isn't
The only way to ensure that people realize that Mandrake is not Red Hat
is to educate people to the fact. That's ALL John was att
riginal Message -
From: John Aldrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, October 09, 1999 9:56 AM
Subject: Re: [newbie] Can't run MODEMTOOL
> On Wed, 06 Oct 1999, you wrote:
> > Hello
> >
> > I am a newbie under Linux and have a big dif
On Wed, 06 Oct 1999, you wrote:
> Hello
>
> I am a newbie under Linux and have a big difficulty with the modem setup
> procedure.
>
> I run Mandrake 6.1 (which is redhat in fact) and read that the first step is
> to declare the modem (quite obvious).
>
MANDRAKE IS **NOT** RedHat. Nor is it even
Just saw Red Hat 6.1 last night and I think they have been taking a look at
Mandrake. There are icons on KDE for floppy and CD mount and they now
have a choice to fully install KDE and Gnome. The KDM util works like
Mandrake 6.0 and a few other things. Their new install utility looks neat
th
On Wed, 06 Oct 1999, you wrote:
> I don't recall seeing Pentium optimized packages in my RH6.0 discs.
>
haha yah. . .lets also point out Mandrake's FUNCTIONAL hardware probe and other
morking scripts that have been absent from RH. . .
--
Seth Gibson
http://www.mp3.com/PsMX
http://members.tri
"cyril.thibout" wrote:
>
> Hello
>
> I am a newbie under Linux and have a big difficulty with the modem setup
> procedure.
>
> I run Mandrake 6.1 (which is redhat in fact) and read that the first step is
Let's stop this dirty little rumor right here. While Mandrake, at some
point, may have be
t
> Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 1999 10:23 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [newbie] Can't run MODEMTOOL
>
>
> Hello
>
> I am a newbie under Linux and have a big difficulty with the modem setup
> procedure.
>
> I run Mandrake 6.1 (which is redhat in fact) and re
Hello
I am a newbie under Linux and have a big difficulty with the modem setup
procedure.
I run Mandrake 6.1 (which is redhat in fact) and read that the first step is
to declare the modem (quite obvious).
the tool is MODEMTOOL but I get a weird error message when I try to launch
it :
Traceback
13 matches
Mail list logo