Re: [newbie] HD-Install vs. FTP-Install?

1999-09-18 Thread Steve Philp
Sean Pritchard wrote: > > OK STEVE: > > I now have all the files for 6.1 (Did I need to download the whole > Mandrake/ directory? as > > /Mandrake/ > /RMPS/ > /base/ > /instimage/ >/lib/ >/modules/ >/usr/ >

Re: [newbie] HD-Install vs. FTP-Install?

1999-09-17 Thread Sean Pritchard
OK STEVE: I now have all the files for 6.1 (Did I need to download the whole Mandrake/ directory? as /Mandrake/ /RMPS/ /base/ /instimage/ /lib/ /modules/ /usr/ /bin/

Re: [newbie] HD-Install vs. FTP-Install?

1999-09-17 Thread Steve Philp
Sean Pritchard wrote: > > Thanx Steve, > > I have a feeling an FTP, might work because of the type of NIC that I > have. I have a DFE-530TX (D-Link 10/100 pci). It uses the via-rhine > module, yet at installation in MDK 6.0 it (the download process) > wouldn't recognize it as such. In Linuxco

Re: [newbie] HD-Install vs. FTP-Install?

1999-09-17 Thread Sean Pritchard
Thanx Steve, I have a feeling an FTP, might work because of the type of NIC that I have. I have a DFE-530TX (D-Link 10/100 pci). It uses the via-rhine module, yet at installation in MDK 6.0 it (the download process) wouldn't recognize it as such. In Linuxconf, I simply had to type in via-rhine

Re: [newbie] HD-Install vs. FTP-Install?

1999-09-17 Thread Steve Philp
Sean Pritchard wrote: > > OK I found some vague documention to HD Installations, and NFS/FTP/HTTP > Installations. > > With cable internet access, I should be able to do an FTP install, but > I could use someone's opinion on wether I should do a HD download and > install versus an FTP install