On Sat, 2004-03-27 at 09:03, Tom Brinkman wrote:
> On Saturday 27 March 2004 03:01 am, Chuck Mattsen wrote:
> > Just a minor annoyance, but wondering if it's "usual" or
> > something else is amiss. (Running MDK as below in sig.)
> >
> > I've noted that after installing most apps (most recently
> >
On Saturday 27 March 2004 09:03, Tom Brinkman wrote:
> On Saturday 27 March 2004 03:01 am, Chuck Mattsen wrote:
> > Just a minor annoyance, but wondering if it's "usual" or
> > something else is amiss. (Running MDK as below in sig.)
> >
> > I've noted that after installing most apps (most recently
On Saturday 27 March 2004 03:01 am, Chuck Mattsen wrote:
> Just a minor annoyance, but wondering if it's "usual" or
> something else is amiss. (Running MDK as below in sig.)
>
> I've noted that after installing most apps (most recently
> "rute" and "gimp-2" via urpmi, but also most others I can
> r
On 03/27/2004 10:01 AM, Chuck Mattsen wrote:
Do others experience this regularly/is this common? Again, just a minor
annoyance and always just a solitary, nonrepeatable "crash," but one of
those "Hmmm..." things, nonetheless.
Very strange. I have never had this happen in all my Linux life (whi
Just a minor annoyance, but wondering if it's "usual" or something else
is amiss. (Running MDK as below in sig.)
I've noted that after installing most apps (most recently "rute" and
"gimp-2" via urpmi, but also most others I can recall), the first
attempt to run that app from the KDE menu will res
Margot wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This message came to the list, but you have your Reply-to set to
Thanks. Done!
--
Pierre
Final Filer Software
http://www.finalfiler.com
Worrigee, NSW, Australia 2540
--
Life's like a roll of toilet paper-
The closer it gets to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just joined this list, but when I sent a post I got:
"Sorry. Your message could not be delivered to:
linux-mandrake newbie,emc (The name was not found at the remote site.
Check that the name has been entered correctly.)"
However, I received my post via the list address,
Just joined this list, but when I sent a post I got:
"Sorry. Your message could not be delivered to:
linux-mandrake newbie,emc (The name was not found at the remote site.
Check that the name has been entered correctly.)"
However, I received my post via the list address,
[EMAIL PROTECTED], so I a
On Sat, 17 November 2001, Roy Hershberger wrote:
>
> Gina,
>
> Gimp is there but you might have to run the software manager to install it if
> it didn't install initially.
>
> Linux ppc should work in any PPC mac, but not in 68k.
>
> Roy
>
> On Saturday 17 November 2001 00:10, you wrote:
>
> One: Is it standard for mandrake 8.1not to come with
> gimp? Is it perhaps that I do not have a full set of
> libraries?
I'm sure gimp is there - use rpmdrake to look for the gimp
RPM and install it. It might not be installed by default,
depending on how you decided to install your system.
>
Gina,
Gimp is there but you might have to run the software manager to install it if
it didn't install initially.
Linux ppc should work in any PPC mac, but not in 68k.
Roy
On Saturday 17 November 2001 00:10, you wrote:
> One: Is it standard for mandrake 8.1not to come with
> gimp? Is it perh
One: Is it standard for mandrake 8.1not to come with
gimp? Is it perhaps that I do not have a full set of
libraries?
Out of curiosity (my partner is a complete mac freak
-ok so I haven't looked at osX as of YET)-
Can you run linux on (I should stress) older mac
architecture?
Gina
__
On Sunday 18 February 2001 01:36, you wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've just decided to give Mandrake a go (Redhat otherwise) & am
> having some fun getting the LM 7.2 installer to work...:
>
> 1) perl script errors on trying to mount "/" in the diskdruid
> (??) program. I'd set the mount point & format t
yes but your fstab.conf file has to have vfat as the type.
Vic wrote:
> Just out of curiosity, I wonder if Linux (any version) can
> read a fat32 partition.
>
> No rush, just curious.
> --
> Want to make some extra pocket change
> listening to your realplayer while you surf?
> http://www.radi
#x27;s get back to being cocky, arrogant
computer geeks! Woo Hoo!)
- Original Message -
From: "Michael Holt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, April 22, 2000 2:25 AM
Subject: Re: [newbie] hmmm, fat32
> haha! Happy Easter to you too!
> M
haha! Happy Easter to you too!
Mike
Dan LaBine wrote:
>
> Enough is Enough!! Have some compassion for the rest of us will ya? It's
> easter for God's sake! Most of us ( I hope! ) just ate a hell of a lot of
> ham or something, and all you can talk about is FAT??? Why not wait until
> tomorrow wh
Yeah, when I first started with Linux (not that long ago)I assigned my
windows partitions the dos file system and I couldn't figure out why all
my file names were getting chopped up (dos only allows 8 char for file
names and 3 for extensions). I switched to vfat and have lived happily
ever after!
Oh wow, someone told me that fat32 was not vfat, whups.
Thankx for the update. :)
On Fri, 21 Apr 2000, you wrote:
> Yes, most distributions come preconfigured to read and write to FAT32. Linux
> calls it vfat.
>
> Mike
>
> Vic wrote:
>
> > Just out of curiosity, I wonder if Linux (any versio
Yes, most distributions come preconfigured to read and write to FAT32. Linux
calls it vfat.
Mike
Vic wrote:
> Just out of curiosity, I wonder if Linux (any version) can
> read a fat32 partition.
>
> No rush, just curious.
> --
> Want to make some extra pocket change
> listening to your realpla
Just out of curiosity, I wonder if Linux (any version) can
read a fat32 partition.
No rush, just curious.
--
Want to make some extra pocket change
listening to your realplayer while you surf?
http://www.radiofreecash.com/home.asp?ref=kittypuss
Sign up for ClickDough and get paid to surf the web
On 13-Mar-2000 Wayne wrote:
> Sorry guys.
>
> Further to my last, I have cheked the ownership of my device (hdd1) under
> my /dev directory and have found that it is owned by me (wapether) and not
> by root, yet root owns all of the directories on it and I cannot change
> the attributes as root
Sorry guys.
Further to my last, I have cheked the ownership of my device (hdd1) under
my /dev directory and have found that it is owned by me (wapether) and not
by root, yet root owns all of the directories on it and I cannot change
the attributes as root or myself. HELP!
Wayne
**
Is there a way to do the auto-update with 6.0?
--Drew Jackman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ICQ: 20177604
On Wed, 27 Oct 1999, you wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Oct 1999, Bill Munden wrote:
> > Are you signing in as root from within a user account that you created? I
> > did and was having the same problem. I exite
On Wed, 27 Oct 1999,Singer XJ Wang wrote:
| Does Mandrake actually work with an 486/
|
Yes it does! I installed both Mandrake 6.0 then 6.1 (both are Macmillan
releases) without any hitches. Of course, my CPU is an AMD x5-133 and this may
not exactly be a 486, but it is on a 486-style board,
Yup,
My old box does keep me waiting some, but not nearly as bad as in Win95. I
mostly wait for apps to load, once their loaded, things work pretty good. I am
using an AMD x5-133 with 80M RAM on a 486a-VIP MB wh. a PCI bus - it was a
pretty good board when I got it. A new board-CPU is on the wish
Does Mandrake actually work with an 486/
On 27 Oct 1999, Jaguar wrote:
> FYI
> When I first got L-M 6.0 home, and installed it...it was to an AST 486 - 66,
> with 16 MB Ram. It installed perfectly ie: no conflicts with CPU, but was
> extremely S L O W...:(
> I have since put L-M on a Cyrix GM
ROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 1999 3:51 AM
Subject: [newbie] Hmmm, update downloads won't work
> Since re-installing Mandrake 6.1 I have a problem using the mandrake
update
> program. It will call up the updates but after I sign in as root it w
FYI
When I first got L-M 6.0 home, and installed it...it was to an AST 486 - 66,
with 16 MB Ram. It installed perfectly ie: no conflicts with CPU, but was
extremely S L O W...:(
I have since put L-M on a Cyrix GM 233 Pentium system with 32 MB Ram, same
install...but much faster.
Jaguar
"Ernest N
Rick,
I had a variety of seemingly unrelated problems when I did the update from
Mandrake 6.0 to 6.1. Most if not all of them were fixed when I removed the
kcmclock package, and reinstalled the kdelibs package. I also did some changes
to my rpmrc file, to let rpm install the Mandrake packages on
Since re-installing Mandrake 6.1 I have a problem using the mandrake update
program. It will call up the updates but after I sign in as root it will not
download and update the files. Is there something I didn't install when I
re-installed mandrake?
Rick
--
"I don't want to swim in a roped o
30 matches
Mail list logo
