Stephen Kuhn wrote:
On Tue, 2002-12-24 at 00:56, John Richard Smith wrote:
Stephen,
I have tried searching the net for modem strings and found
many examples for different makes and models, but search
as I may I cannot find anything to explain the modem
string naming convention. I cannot beli
On Tue, 2002-12-24 at 00:56, John Richard Smith wrote:
> Stephen,
>
> I have tried searching the net for modem strings and found
> many examples for different makes and models, but search
> as I may I cannot find anything to explain the modem
> string naming convention. I cannot believe that ther
g wrote:
John Richard Smith wrote:
Just as a way of final conclusion on the subject of freeserve.
Their claim that I have too many appliances connected to my one
telephone line
and that, they say, is the reason I am being constantly cut off.
Today I conducted some experiments.
I disconnected
John Richard Smith wrote:
>
> Just as a way of final conclusion on the subject of freeserve.
> Their claim that I have too many appliances connected to my one
> telephone line
> and that, they say, is the reason I am being constantly cut off.
> Today I conducted some experiments.
> I disconnect
Michael Adams wrote:
On Tue, 24 Dec 2002 02:56, John Richard Smith wrote:
Stephen Kuhn wrote:
>On Sun, 2002-12-22 at 08:23, John Richard Smith wrote:
>
>Ok...I didn't see the attachment - where it says bot INIT 0 AND INIT 1;
>you would then add:
>
>AT &F &C1 &D1 E1 Q0 V1
>
>That should do it.
On Tue, 24 Dec 2002 02:56, John Richard Smith wrote:
> Stephen Kuhn wrote:
> >On Sun, 2002-12-22 at 08:23, John Richard Smith wrote:
> >
> >Ok...I didn't see the attachment - where it says bot INIT 0 AND INIT 1;
> >you would then add:
> >
> >AT &F &C1 &D1 E1 Q0 V1
> >
> >That should do it.
Stephen Kuhn wrote:
>On Sun, 2002-12-22 at 08:23, John Richard Smith wrote:
>
>Ok...I didn't see the attachment - where it says bot INIT 0 AND INIT 1;
>you would then add:
>
>AT &F &C1 &D1 E1 Q0 V1
>
>That should do it.
>
>You should get better throughput with that init as well as have less
>line
Stephen Kuhn wrote:
On Sun, 2002-12-22 at 08:23, John Richard Smith wrote:
Ok...I didn't see the attachment - where it says bot INIT 0 AND INIT 1;
you would then add:
AT &F &C1 &D1 E1 Q0 V1
That should do it.
You should get better throughput with that init as well as have less
line noise - IF
On Sun, 2002-12-22 at 08:23, John Richard Smith wrote:
Ok...I didn't see the attachment - where it says bot INIT 0 AND INIT 1;
you would then add:
AT &F &C1 &D1 E1 Q0 V1
That should do it.
You should get better throughput with that init as well as have less
line noise - IF that is the problem.
On Sun, 2002-12-22 at 08:23, John Richard Smith wrote:
> Thanks, Stephen,
> Say were do I check up for that,
>
> I attatch a few modem settings.
>
> John
> --
> John Richard Smith
Well, without having prior knowledge of your dialing habits, wherever it
is that you setup your modem, there shoul
10 matches
Mail list logo
