On Sun, 10 Apr 2005 21:05:57 +0100
Elwyn York wrote:
> Don't undestand where I've gone wrong :(
use
# sh /home/elwyn/install-crossover3.sh
Charles
--
"But officer, I was only trying to gain enough speed so I could coast
to the nearest gas station."
-
Mandrake
Elwyn York wrote:
Hiya
Was planning to do the upgrade today but I loaned my car out and left the 10.2
CDs in there :( Doh!
Anyway, Tried to install Crossover Office and it didnt like it...
[EMAIL PROTECTED] elwyn]$ su
Password:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] elwyn]# '/home/elwyn/install-crossover3.sh'
bash: /
Hiya
Was planning to do the upgrade today but I loaned my car out and left the 10.2
CDs in there :( Doh!
Anyway, Tried to install Crossover Office and it didnt like it...
[EMAIL PROTECTED] elwyn]$ su
Password:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] elwyn]# '/home/elwyn/install-crossover3.sh'
bash: /home/elwyn/insta
i used the 10.1 disk and was asked to prvide a driver
Regards Isak
Paul wrote:
Isak
Lyberth wrote:
how do i go about getting to install a sata
module during the installation? i have an intel 82801 SATA controler,
its a raid thing.
Regards Isak
Paul wrote:
Isak Lyberth wrote:
how do i go about getting to install a sata module during the
installation? i have an intel 82801 SATA controler, its a raid thing.
Regards Isak
Paul wrote:
Isak Lyberth wrote:
Is it possible to install mandrake on a computer using sata disks?
Regards Isak
Yes.
Well I have, ha
how do i go about getting to install a sata module during the
installation? i have an intel 82801 SATA controler, its a raid thing.
Regards Isak
Paul wrote:
Isak
Lyberth wrote:
Is it possible to install mandrake on a
computer using sata disks?
Regards Isak
Yes.
Isak Lyberth wrote:
Is it possible to install mandrake on a computer using sata disks?
Regards Isak
Yes.
Well I have, had some trouble with the first release candidate of 10.0
(I think it was) - had to install sata_sil module at boot to install -
but no problems since then.
_
Is it possible to install mandrake on a computer using sata disks?
Regards Isak
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Join the Club : http://www.mandrakeclub.com
_
On Tuesday 15 February 2005 07:52 am, riccardo wrote:
> On Tuesday 15 February 2005 01:01 pm, James Nunnerley wrote:
> > Can anyone assist with what the problem is likely to be?
>
> ___
>
> ~ maybe a module. such as Reiser file system is not loading?
>
> best rgds
>
More l
On Tuesday 15 February 2005 01:01 pm, James Nunnerley wrote:
> Can anyone assist with what the problem is likely to be?
___
~ maybe a module. such as Reiser file system is not loading?
best rgds
Want to buy your Pack or
Hi all,
I’ve just tried to install Mandrake 10.1, but it keeps
coming up with the following: (this is the last three lines of the output…)
RAMDISK: Compress image found at block 0
Invalid compressed format (err=2)
Kernel panic: VFS: Unable to mount root fs on
unknown-block(1,3)
Well - I have an install - did not get GUI up so obviously have a couple
of things to sort out. LILO worked great - so thank you to those who
helped. I'll reboot to Mdk and see what I can work out. Printer is
perfect!
Thanks
Rosemary
Kaj Haulrich wrote:
On Monday 07 February 2005 23:25, you
On Monday 07 February 2005 23:25, you wrote:
> >Sometimes it refuses to boot from CD1, in that case try CD2,
> > it'll prompt you to change disks later on.
> >
> >BTW two things :
> >
> >1. please don't post in html. Most people here filter
> > html-messages out before they get read.
> >
> >2. ple
On Monday 07 February 2005 04:40, Rosemary McGillicuddy wrote:
> Kaj Haulrich wrote:
> happens. I rebooted with disc in situ and get the window with
> the two options " press F1' and "enter to install" Looked at F1
> and then pressed enter. It appeared to start installing but then
> the monitor
Hi
I am attempting to install Mandrake 10.1 on an AMD Athlon 2000+ running
WinXP. I've been to hardware devices list but little detail as it was a
'pre-packaged' system. Display adapter VIA/S3G, legacy audio drivers.
I put the first disc in and the options highlight when I hover the
cursor.
On Sunday 23 Jan 2005 16:35, Cyber Killer wrote:
> I see that my post got lost in the discussion, so here goes again...
>
>
> I got the 10.1 official download dvd. Everything burned OK. I boot the
> comp, I see the splash screen, I press F2, type "expert", [enter]. The
> kernel loads
>
> And th
On Sunday 23 Jan 2005 16:35, Cyber Killer wrote:
> + some stuff connected to USB, a scanner, a printer,...
http://www.osnews.com/story.php?news_id=7320&page=3
This chap has written a review on Mandrake 10 and has stated he's had problems
with the Hotplug feature... Usb Devices??
Cheers, Elwyn
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday 23 Jan 2005 17:30, Elwyn wrote:
> On Sunday 23 Jan 2005 16:35, Cyber Killer wrote:
> > Here is a list of my hardware:
>
> Have you tried having unplugged your extra USB things incase there is a
> problem there??
>
That's a good point. Settin
On Sunday 23 Jan 2005 16:35, Cyber Killer wrote:
> Here is a list of my hardware:
> cpu: P4 1700
> ram: 256 MB RAMBUS
> gfx: Radeon 7200 64 MB
> snd: SB Live! Player 1024
> hdd: Seagate Barracuda 7200 120 GB
> dvd: LG GDR-8162B
> cdrw: LG GCE-8524B
> lan: Realtek RTL8139
> + some stuff connected to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday 23 Jan 2005 17:01, Cyber Killer wrote:
> Anne Wilson wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > On Sunday 23 Jan 2005 16:35, Cyber Killer wrote:
> >>Seagate Barracuda 7200 120 GB
> >
> > That's a SATA disk, I think?
Anne Wilson wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday 23 Jan 2005 16:35, Cyber Killer wrote:
Seagate Barracuda 7200 120 GB
That's a SATA disk, I think? You might like to search the archives for
booting from SATA disks
no, it's not SATA, it's a standard ATA133 hdd
--
Cyber Ki
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday 23 Jan 2005 16:35, Cyber Killer wrote:
> Seagate Barracuda 7200 120 GB
That's a SATA disk, I think? You might like to search the archives for
booting from SATA disks
Anne
- --
Registered Linux User No.293302 (http://counter.li.org/)
Have
I see that my post got lost in the discussion, so here goes again...
I got the 10.1 official download dvd. Everything burned OK. I boot the
comp, I see the splash screen, I press F2, type "expert", [enter]. The
kernel loads
And that's all - I'm left with a blank screen, and nothing else happens
I got the 10.1 official download dvd. Everything burned OK. I boot the
comp, I see the splash screen, I press F2, type "expert", [enter]. The
kernel loads
And that's all - I'm left with a blank screen, and nothing else happens.
I had the same problem with 10.0, but then I thought I just burn
Hello, Thanks for your reply. I reinstalled mandrake, and choose LILO
as the boot loader, and then it worked. Since I installed Linux from
hard disk. there seems to be no method for me to edit the menu.lst or
the fstab. Anyway, the problem is solved. Thank you.
On Sun, 17 Oct 2004 07:40:32 -0500,
On Saturday 16 October 2004 10:08 am, Boyi Zeng wrote:
> Hello,
> Yesterday I tried to install mandrake linux 10.1 to my notebook.
> The installation process is smooth. But I got problem at the startup
> after installation. The error message is like that:
> checking root partition:
> fsck.ext
Hello,
Yesterday I tried to install mandrake linux 10.1 to my notebook.
The installation process is smooth. But I got problem at the startup
after installation. The error message is like that:
checking root partition:
fsck.ext3: unable to resolve 'LABEL=/'
I had windows XP in my notebook befo
On Thu, 2004-07-29 at 03:34, paul mccarthy wrote:
> I'm sure this question has been asked before in various forms for various
> drivers but I can't find the answer on the site.
>
> I have a scsi CD (HP CDwriter) running off an Advansys SCSI card (narrow).
>
> I had absolutely no problems with in
I'm sure this question has been asked before in various forms for various
drivers but I can't find the answer on the site.
I have a scsi CD (HP CDwriter) running off an Advansys SCSI card (narrow).
I had absolutely no problems with installing Mandrake linux up through the
various beta and RC ver
> OTOH, I've had more trouble with lesser problems. I just spent two
> hours with a network problem. The rj45 wasn't plugged in.
Ya I done that as well in the past :-)
--
Marc Hultquist ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Computerkit Systems (Pty) Ltd
http://www.cks.co.za
(P) +27 11 695 5317
(F) +27 11 3
ike this (or to hack it).
Sorry for my english :>
Best Regards
Tomas Tudja
- Original Message -
From: "Todd Slater" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, July 26, 2004 2:57 PM
Subject: Re: [newbie] Installation folder for Apache 2 ???
> On Mo
On Monday, 26 July 2004 15:57, Todd Slater wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 26, 2004 at 07:11:14AM +0200, Marc Hultquist wrote:
> > > /var/www/html
> >
> > In-correct. By default apache2 installs its htdocs/ in the folder where
> > everything else is installed, I.E if when installing apache you do as
> > follo
On Mon, 26 Jul 2004 09:57:05 -0400
Todd Slater <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 26, 2004 at 07:11:14AM +0200, Marc Hultquist wrote:
> >
> > > /var/www/html
> > In-correct. By default apache2 installs its htdocs/ in the
> > folder where everything else is installed, I.E if when
> > install
On Mon, Jul 26, 2004 at 07:11:14AM +0200, Marc Hultquist wrote:
>
> > /var/www/html
> In-correct. By default apache2 installs its htdocs/ in the folder where
> everything else is installed, I.E if when installing apache you do as follows
> ./configure --prefix=/apache/ < your apache will be inst
> /var/www/html
In-correct. By default apache2 installs its htdocs/ in the folder where
everything else is installed, I.E if when installing apache you do as follows
./configure --prefix=/apache/ < your apache will be installed in
obviously /apache/ and your htdocs will be in /apache/htdocs/ !
On Mon, 26 Jul 2004 00:28:12 -0400
Sujit Apte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Gentlemen,
>
> I have installed Apache 2 + PHP + mysql with Mandrake linux 10.00.
>
> In Apache installation there is a folder called "htdocs" where we
> put all data i.e. HTML files,
> PHP code and other stuff.
> However
On Mon, 26 Jul 2004 00:28:12 -0400
Sujit Apte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Gentlemen,
>
> I have installed Apache 2 + PHP + mysql with Mandrake linux 10.00.
>
> In Apache installation there is a folder called "htdocs" where we
> put all data i.e. HTML files,
> PHP code and other stuff.
> However
Gentlemen,
I have installed Apache 2 + PHP + mysql with Mandrake linux 10.00.
In Apache installation there is a folder called "htdocs" where we put
all data i.e. HTML files,
PHP code and other stuff.
However I did not see this "htdocs" folder nor Apache2 installation
folder. I tried searching
eve
nut megger wrote:
Hardware: ThinkPad X21 with UltraBay; newly obtained
PCMCIA fax/modem card to use to dial up my ISP.
Question: Should the fax/modem card be inserted first
and then a new Linux installation performed or should
the card be inserted while Linux is running and it
will be recognized
Hardware: ThinkPad X21 with UltraBay; newly obtained
PCMCIA fax/modem card to use to dial up my ISP.
Question: Should the fax/modem card be inserted first
and then a new Linux installation performed or should
the card be inserted while Linux is running and it
will be recognized so that it can be
On Sat, 2004-03-20 at 10:05, et wrote:
> On Friday 19 March 2004 10:12 am, Steve Turner wrote:
> > I got the following error while trying to install the 64 bit version:
> >
> > FATAL ERROR IN STAGE1 I/O Error
> >
> > It says it can't recover and I should reboot?
> >
> > Any help would be great.
>
On Friday 19 March 2004 10:12 am, Steve Turner wrote:
> I got the following error while trying to install the 64 bit version:
>
> FATAL ERROR IN STAGE1 I/O Error
>
> It says it can't recover and I should reboot?
>
> Any help would be great.
I agree about hitting 'f1', if you get that far, but i
Hardware is all new.
- Original Message -
From:
Ayares, Mark
(Mark)
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Sent: Friday, March 19, 2004 8:32
AM
Subject: RE: [newbie] Installation
Problem
Depending on how old the hardware is, I have had success with older
ubject: Re: [newbie]
Installation Problem
I had the same error with a 32b version. Do
you install from CD? If so the cd you use might be bad. I tried to
do network install and it worked (well, I had a different error and I still
haven't installed the os, but that's d
od for you for some reason, try to burn the cd again.
Marcin
- Original Message -
From:
Steve
Turner
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 19, 2004 8:12
AM
Subject: [newbie] Installation
Problem
I got the following error while trying to install
the 64 b
I got the following error while trying to install
the 64 bit version:
FATAL ERROR IN STAGE1 I/O Error
It says it can't recover and I should
reboot?
Any help would be great.
Sorry this is going to be long.
I begin by installing on a spare 30G disk, unplugged main disk and installed
WC300. Installation went ok but somehow missed configuration for mouse.
The mouse worked fine during install but would not work at all after booting
into new system(wouldnt move or react in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Saturday 27 December 2003 1:09 am, Steven Nelson wrote:
> The installation said, try /usr/lib/mozilla, Mozilla was at
> /usr/bin/Mozilla.
>
> From,
>
>Steven
Before you work yourself into a lather and start screami
On Saturday 27 December 2003 06:56, Steven Nelson wrote:
> Hi, tried the command. It stated to enter a valid installation
> path. Do you know where else the installation path could be?
>
Try slocate mozilla (you may have to install slocate). It's probably
looking for the plugins directory.
Anne
Blomquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [newbie] Installation path of Mozilla.
Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2003 23:27:40 -0800
On Friday 26 December 2003 10:56 pm, Steven Nelson droned on:
> Hi, tried the command. It stated to enter a valid installation
On Friday 26 December 2003 10:56 pm, Steven Nelson droned on:
> Hi, tried the command. It stated to enter a valid installation path. Do you
> know where else the installation path could be?
Try the command "which mozilla" on your machine. If its in your path, it will
tell you where it is.
If its
,
Steven
From: Charlie Mahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [newbie] Installation path of Mozilla.
Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2003 23:40:28 -0700
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Friday 26 December 2003 11:24 pm, Steven Nelson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Friday 26 December 2003 11:24 pm, Steven Nelson wrote:
> Trying to install Macromedia Flashplayer. During installation it asks for
> the installation path of Mozilla. Will somebody tell me the installation
> path of Mozilla in Mandrake 9.2?
>
>
Trying to install Macromedia Flashplayer. During installation it asks for
the installation path of Mozilla. Will somebody tell me the installation
path of Mozilla in Mandrake 9.2?
From,
Melissa Reese wrote:
Hi John,
What sort of dialup modem do you have ?
Well, here's a peculiar update. I was just over in Mandrake, and I
finally at least got the dial-up working!
Good,
I was able to receive your message in Kmail, but I couldn't send my
reply from there. The error message sa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi John,
On Wednesday, November 19, 2003, at 12:58:05 AM PST, you wrote:
> Cann't help the ethernet cards, no previous experience, nor cable
> modems.
> What sort of dialup modem do you have ?
Well, here's a peculiar update. I was just over in Man
Melissa Reese wrote:
Hi John,
Vendor: Silicon Integrated Systems
Bus: PCI
Bus Identification: 1039:900:1043:80a7
Location on the Bus: 0:4:0
Description: SiS900 10/100 Ethernet
Module: sis900
Media Class: NETWORK_ETHERNET
Then, it also detects this:
Vendor: USB Ethernet [pegasus]
Bus: USB
Descrip
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi John,
On Tuesday, November 18, 2003, at 11:38:43 PM PST, you wrote:
> Of course you can start all over again, and maybe you ought to, just
> for experience, but linux offers you many solutions, you can run
> XFdrake from that root terminal instead
Melissa Reese wrote:
Okay...I did install Mandrake, but I may have missed something crucial
with regards to the "X" server thingy.
It seems that I haven't properly configured my monitor and/or the X
server thing. How can I go back and try this again? Can I just boot
up with the first install
On Wednesday 19 November 2003 02:13, Greg Meyer wrote:
> On Tuesday 18 November 2003 06:44 pm, Melissa Reese wrote:
> > It seems that I haven't properly configured my monitor and/or the X
> > server thing. How can I go back and try this again? Can I just boot
> > up with the first installation CD
On Tuesday 18 November 2003 06:44 pm, Melissa Reese wrote:
> It seems that I haven't properly configured my monitor and/or the X
> server thing. How can I go back and try this again? Can I just boot
> up with the first installation CD and start all over again?
Yes, but we can probably fix it wit
Charlie M. wrote:
Tuesday 18 November 2003 12:51 pm, John Richard Smith wrote:
Melissa Reese wrote:
>As long as I can be very sure that I'm only messing with my 20 GB
>drive, I'll be happy to stumble through some more trial and error
>myself, because if all I mess up is the fresh drive with no e
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tuesday 18 November 2003 12:51 pm, John Richard Smith wrote:
> Melissa Reese wrote:
> > As long as I can be very sure that I'm only messing with my 20 GB
> > drive, I'll be happy to stumble through some more trial and error
> > myself, because if all I
On Tuesday 18 November 2003 03:07 pm, Melissa Reese wrote:
> Hi Bryan,
>
> As long as I can be very sure that I'm only messing with my 20 GB
> drive, I'll be happy to stumble through some more trial and error
> myself, because if all I mess up is the fresh drive with no essential
> data on it yet,
Melissa Reese wrote:
As long as I can be very sure that I'm only messing with my 20 GB
drive, I'll be happy to stumble through some more trial and error
myself, because if all I mess up is the fresh drive with no essential
data on it yet, I can always just start over. However, there's another
th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tuesday 18 November 2003 1:07 pm, Melissa Reese wrote:
> Hi Bryan,
> This is a custom built computer, so I'll have to ask the guy who built
> it if he can explain what the MDK installation was seeing.
>
> As long as I can be very sure that I'm only me
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 18 Nov 2003 12:07:05 -0800, Melissa Reese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
about Re: [newbie] Installation aborted - by me:
>The starter guide also suggests possibly changing a setting or two in
>the BIOS in order to make the installat
Nick Andriash wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Anne,
Tuesday, November 18, 2003, 4:22:05 AM, you wrote:
Choose the one you want for install, and make a partition for /home
(so that if you get any data on it you will be able to re-install or
upgrade without losing your d
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Bryan,
On Tuesday, November 18, 2003, at 4:07:03 AM PST, you wrote:
> I don't know what kind of computer you have but just a quick guess.
> Some of the proprietary computers like Compaq, etc. often create a
> small partition on the beginning of th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 18 Nov 2003 07:36:11 -0700, Nick Andriash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote about Re: [newbie] Installation aborted - by me:
>> Choose the one you want for install, and make a partition for /home
>> (so that if you get any data on i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Anne,
Tuesday, November 18, 2003, 4:22:05 AM, you wrote:
> Choose the one you want for install, and make a partition for /home
> (so that if you get any data on it you will be able to re-install or
> upgrade without losing your data). I assume
I've changed the subject line, as someone has pointed out to me that
the word 'aborted' is causing the thread to be dropped by some mail
filters.
On Tuesday 18 Nov 2003 11:57 am, Melissa Reese wrote:
> Hi Anne,
>
> On Tuesday, November 18, 2003, at 3:22:05 AM PST, you wrote:
> > Select 'Custom
On Tuesday 18 November 2003 06:57 am, Melissa Reese wrote:
> This time around, I got to the next step of choosing the drive (and
> many other options for partitioning), and again I stopped...just to be
> safe. There were two tabs ("hda" and "hdb"), and the second tab did
> look like the 20 GB driv
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Anne,
On Tuesday, November 18, 2003, at 3:22:05 AM PST, you wrote:
> Select 'Custom disk partitioning'
> There you should see your two disks. Choose the one you want for
> install,
Thanks Anne. Here's a small update...
This time around, I go
On Tuesday 18 Nov 2003 10:34 am, Melissa Reese wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I decided to give the installation a go by myself, figuring that if
> I messed it up, I could just abort and wait until my friend could
> be here to hold my hand. Here's the story so far (I'm pretty
> sleepy, so I hope I get this righ
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I decided to give the installation a go by myself, figuring that if I
messed it up, I could just abort and wait until my friend could be
here to hold my hand. Here's the story so far (I'm pretty sleepy, so
I hope I get this right)...
I have two
Matt Dynice wrote:
Hello,
I am really new to Linux and I have a couple questions regarding the
partitioning section of the install (I read the quick start manual and
it didn't help.) First off I am running on Windows 2000 Pro on one
hard drive and my second hard drive is what I want to run M
-
From:
Matt
Dynice
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, November 02, 2003 12:44
AM
Subject: [newbie] Installation help with
partitioning
Hello,
I am really new to Linux and I have a couple
questions regarding the partitioning section of the install (I read the quick
Hello,
I am really new to Linux and I have a couple
questions regarding the partitioning section of the install (I read the quick
start manual and it didn't help.) First off I am running on Windows 2000
Pro on one hard drive and my second hard drive is what I want to run Mandrake
9.2 on.
Dennis Myers wrote:
On Friday 05 September 2003 01:24 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Tony,
I used that link. Many packages gave me the message:
"The signature of the package xxx is not correct
No GPG signature package
Do you want to install it anyway?"
Is there a
On Friday 05 September 2003 01:24 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi Tony,
>
> I used that link. Many packages gave me the message:
>
> "The signature of the package xxx is not correct
> No GPG signature package
> Do you want to install it anyway?"
>
> Is there a way to fix
this link http://plf.zarb.org/~nanardon/urpmiweb.php .
Tony.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 05, 2003 8:14 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [newbie] Installation problem.
Hi,
I went and installed the LM9.0 back. It worked f
Any hints anybody? I want LM9.1 to work on my machine, like win2k does
and LM9.0 did.
During installation of LM9.1, the graphics card was recognized correctly
(RIVA TNT2 with 32Megs) but the Futura monitor was not. Many alternate
monitors from the generic monitor list and many combinations of
Any hints anybody?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Shame, the win2k is working and the LM9.1 on the same machine is not.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
During installation of LM9.1, the graphics card was recognized
correctly (RIVA TNT2 with 32Megs) but the Futura monitor was not. Many
alternate monit
Shame, the win2k is working and the LM9.1 on the same machine is not.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
During installation of LM9.1, the graphics card was recognized correctly
(RIVA TNT2 with 32Megs) but the Futura monitor was not. Many alternate
monitors from the generic monitor list and many com
Hi,
During installation of LM9.1, the graphics card was recognized correctly
(RIVA TNT2 with 32Megs) but the Futura monitor was not. Many alternate
monitors from the generic monitor list and many combinations of
horizontal rate, vertical rate, resolutions and colors for custom
monitor configur
On Sat, 2003-08-09 at 23:28, Stephen Kuhn wrote:
> On Sun, 2003-08-10 at 07:18, Heather/Femme wrote:
> > I have to install my linux by passing the argument "linux vga=normal"
> > *Ty Charles :)* to the Kernel to get video. While doing so is fine, i
> > get a normal installation & I want the insta
> On Sat, 2003-08-09 at 19:56, ed tharp wrote:
> > if you are installing 9.1, there is no "expert" mode, like there was
> > in 7.0-9.0, but in some sections (like configuring the network) you
> > can chose an expert mode.
>
> FFS... thx Ed. Btw whats the link to that mailing list archive you
> tr
On 09 Aug 2003 19:56:16 -0400
ed tharp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> if you are installing 9.1, there is no "expert" mode, like there was
> in 7.0-9.0, but in some sections (like configuring the network) you
> can chose an expert mode.
There is still an expert mode.
It is not avaiable from the def
On Sat, 2003-08-09 at 22:42, Charles A Edwards wrote:
> On 09 Aug 2003 19:56:16 -0400
> ed tharp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > if you are installing 9.1, there is no "expert" mode, like there was
> > in 7.0-9.0, but in some sections (like configuring the network) you
> > can chose an expert mod
On Sat, 2003-08-09 at 19:56, ed tharp wrote:
> On Sat, 2003-08-09 at 17:18, Heather/Femme wrote:
> > I have to install my linux by passing the argument "linux vga=normal"
> > *Ty Charles :)* to the Kernel to get video. While doing so is fine, i
> > get a normal installation & I want the installer
On Sunday August 10 2003 02:42 am, Charles A Edwards wrote:
> On 09 Aug 2003 19:56:16 -0400
>
> ed tharp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > if you are installing 9.1, there is no "expert" mode, like
> > there was in 7.0-9.0, but in some sections (like configuring
> > the network) you can chose an exper
On Sat, 2003-08-09 at 17:18, Heather/Femme wrote:
> I have to install my linux by passing the argument "linux vga=normal"
> *Ty Charles :)* to the Kernel to get video. While doing so is fine, i
> get a normal installation & I want the installer to use Expert mode.
> Can i add another arg to that
I have to install my linux by passing the argument "linux vga=normal"
*Ty Charles :)* to the Kernel to get video. While doing so is fine, i
get a normal installation & I want the installer to use Expert mode.
Can i add another arg to that line to pass to the kernel? if so syntax
pls?
Ty
--
Fe
On Sat, 2003-08-09 at 22:42, Charles A Edwards wrote:
> On 09 Aug 2003 19:56:16 -0400
> ed tharp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > if you are installing 9.1, there is no "expert" mode, like there was
> > in 7.0-9.0, but in some sections (like configuring the network) you
> > can chose an expert mod
On Sun, 2003-08-10 at 07:18, Heather/Femme wrote:
> I have to install my linux by passing the argument "linux vga=normal"
> *Ty Charles :)* to the Kernel to get video. While doing so is fine, i
> get a normal installation & I want the installer to use Expert mode.
> Can i add another arg to that
On Sat, 2003-08-09 at 18:44, Heather/Femme wrote:
> On Sat, 2003-08-09 at 19:56, ed tharp wrote:
> > On Sat, 2003-08-09 at 17:18, Heather/Femme wrote:
> > > I have to install my linux by passing the argument "linux vga=normal"
> > > *Ty Charles :)* to the Kernel to get video. While doing so is fi
hi
iam trying to install mandrake 9 on my system, after
the initialization, it gives me an error message.
"cannot load kernel module in memory"
then it quits saying "failed in second stage" eject
etc...
system is amd k6-2 500mhz, hd is 40gb, installation is
attempted on first partition (5gb),
> eric huff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Yeah, defrag it first, then you can resize it when you install. Make
> > sure to back up your XP data first...
>
> Diskdrake in 9.0 can not resize NTFS
> Using a 3rd party app such as PM v5 or other such partition program will
> be necessary.
> Try googl
On Tue, 2003-06-10 at 21:22, Henri Bouchard wrote:
> I just bought mandrake Power Pack 9.0 I am on windows XP on the main
> drive and I have a second drive on fat 32.
> Can I install on main drive with win XP without loosing any XP or do I
> have to install on second drive that is partitioned allr
1 - 100 of 530 matches
Mail list logo
