On Thursday 08 March 2001 05:41 am, Dale Kosan wrote:
> Sorry if this has been answered before, I am trying to install the new
> kde2.1 final on my Mandrake 7.2 box.I downloaded all the rpms and did a
> rpm -Uvh *.rpm --test, this is the result:
You might want to see if you get any reponses
Sorry if this has been answered before, I am trying to install the new kde2.1
final on my Mandrake 7.2 box.I downloaded all the rpms and did a rpm -Uvh
*.rpm --test, this is the result:
[dale@gandalf test]$ rpm -Uvh *.rpm --test
file /usr/bin/kwebdesktop from install of kdebase-2.1-2mdk confli
Hello,
I can no longer speak for Mandrake as I am no longer working for the company,
but here is my guess: There was probably a slight confusion over who is
responsible for making the new RPM's. I had been creating all RPM's for the
7.2 KDE updates until about 2 weeks ago. It takes time to rea
Your escapee's name is Zope.
And I've noticed that other than security fixes, the only way to get
updated Mandrake packages is to use the "unsupported" ones scattered
across sites like wtfo.com. If appearances are used to judge Mandrake,
then even MS has the appearances of releasing non-security
True, true. All of L-M's sites/mirrors are slow in offering
updates. They still (as of this posting) don't have the
recently released CUPS security update, nor do they have today's
"sudo' security fix (and one other whose name escapes me,
starting with a Z). What gives?
And anyone know why Man
hi all,
They just released the KDE2.1 today and I went to
the site to see if they have the rpm for mandrake. the directory
there is empty while RedHat, Suse, and Caldera have their RPM
available. What's with the Mandrake's RPM? why are they not
ready when all the other one are?
Rob
Hello all,quick question.After upgrading to to 2.1 my floppy and cdrom icons
on the desktop no longer function right.Used to be if I mounted a disk and
clicked on the icon it would open with Konqueror.Now I get asked wich
application do I want to open it with.I have specified Konqueror and told
manator wrote:
>
> > Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2001 11:04:16 -0500
> > From: Romanator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Subject: [newbie] KDE2.1 Beta 2 win2000 Look
> >
>
ot;
On Sat, 27 Jan 2001, Romanator wrote:
> Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2001 11:04:16 -0500
> From: Romanator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: [newbie] KDE2.1 Beta 2 win2000 Look
>
> Hi all,
&
Hi all,
You guessed it, I'm trying to figure out kde2.1 Beta 2. For some reason,
I was able to select the win 2000 look in user. However, I cannot
reproduce this under root. Strange, it's usually the other way around.
Roman
On Fri, 29 Dec 2000, you wrote:
> I am having exactly the same problem as Dan, libkscan.so.1 is needed and I
> was so far unsuccessful in finding it (ufff...) HELP please!
>
> Have a great New Year you all!
>
> Hektor
Don't worry about it. I ignored it and installed the package, everything
seems
On Friday 29 December 2000 01:06 pm, Hektor Meyer wrote:
> I am having exactly the same problem as Dan, libkscan.so.1 is needed
> and I was so far unsuccessful in finding it (ufff...) HELP please!
It's not needed. Install kdeaddutils-2.1-0.20001213.1mdk with
the --nodeps option and all wi
I am having exactly the same problem as Dan, libkscan.so.1 is needed and I
was so far unsuccessful in finding it (ufff...) HELP please!
Have a great New Year you all!
Hektor
Barry Premeaux wrote:
>
> Tom Brinkman wrote:
> >
> >
> > I've been using all of Chris' KDE2 updates since mid-November
> > including the latest KDE 2.1 beta 1. I've found that the last one is
> > very stable, as bug free as Linux ever gets. I don't even consider
> > 2.1b1 to be beta. It
Tom Brinkman wrote:
>
>
> I've been using all of Chris' KDE2 updates since mid-November
> including the latest KDE 2.1 beta 1. I've found that the last one is
> very stable, as bug free as Linux ever gets. I don't even consider
> 2.1b1 to be beta. It adds many features, bug fixes over 2.
A question: Don't the beta releases of KDE contain bugfix code? If so,
doesn't this slow the KDE beta versions down?
Robert
On Tuesday 26 December 2000 11:09, you wrote:
> Tom Brinkman wrote:
> > On Monday 25 December 2000 09:08 pm, Barry Premeaux wrote:
> > > Has anyone tried using Chris'
On Monday 25 December 2000 09:08 pm, Barry Premeaux wrote:
> Has anyone tried using Chris's KDE2.1 updates? I've been using
> his 2.0.1 updates and am really pleased with them thus far. I'm
> considering making the move to 2.1, but am wondering just how
> stable it is.
I've been using all
Has anyone tried using Chris's KDE2.1 updates? I've been using
his 2.0.1 updates and am really pleased with them thus far. I'm
considering making the move to 2.1, but am wondering just how
stable it is.
Barry :-)
18 matches
Mail list logo
