Re: [newbie] Linux Not for Average Users (Was: Linux for home consumers?)

1999-08-16 Thread Rick Fry
I'm running release candidate 1 as we speak. In 1280x1024 at 24 bit color, by the way. Original Message Follows -- Tired of waiting for Windows 2000? STOP WAITING! http://www.ms-windows-2000.com/ ___ Get Free Email an

Re: [newbie] Linux Not for Average Users (Was: Linux for home consumers?)

1999-08-16 Thread Bernhard Rosenkraenzer
On Mon, 16 Aug 1999, James Schofield wrote: > The Average user wants all the Warrenty and assurances - reliable service, > documentation and FULL service support that a Microsoft can and will supply. Have you ever tried calling Microsoft support for something? They really aren't much of a help.

Re: [newbie] Linux Not for Average Users (Was: Linux for home consumers?)

1999-08-16 Thread chris
>My reply to this would be like buying a NEW Car from the DEALER rather than >a HOT ROD from a Mechanic. > >The Average user wants all the Warrenty and assurances - reliable service, >documentation and FULL service support that a Microsoft can and will supply. > >If you want to own a HOTROD you h

Re: [newbie] Linux Not for Average Users (Was: Linux for home consumers?)

1999-08-16 Thread chris
>Red Hat makes most of its money by support contracts. That makes sense. I wonder if that will work in the long run, or if established big consultants will say "we do Linux too" and keep their old clients through any migration to Linux. I guess they'll find out.

Re: [newbie] Linux Not for Average Users (Was: Linux for home consumers?)

1999-08-16 Thread James Schofield
> >Exactly, and who needs an ultra powerful microwave to nuke a little tv dinner? >The average user needs little more than entertainment and an office suit with >little or no time wasted in learning how it works. For this, they are willing >to pay big bucks. > My reply to this would be like b

Re: [newbie] Linux Not for Average Users (Was: Linux for home consumers?)

1999-08-16 Thread Bernhard Rosenkraenzer
On Mon, 16 Aug 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > (It does > kind of baffle me that a company like Red Hat can go public and have their > stock do well - who the heck would gamble on a company that takes something > that everyone can get for free, slaps a name on it, and charges $80? Red Hat makes

Re: [newbie] Linux Not for Average Users (Was: Linux for home consumers?)

1999-08-16 Thread chris
>Exactly, and who needs an ultra powerful microwave to nuke a little tv dinner? >The average user needs little more than entertainment and an office suit with >little or no time wasted in learning how it works. For this, they are willing >to pay big bucks. What's encouraging about Linux, is t

Re: [newbie] Linux Not for Average Users (Was: Linux for home consumers?)

1999-08-16 Thread Dan Hamilton
>So in other words, No, Linux isn't ready for the Average User, if I may be >so bold as to claim that an Average User has only an average, and not >above-average, interest in "getting under the hood". Sacrificing >lexibility and money for ease of use is what rational consumers do - not >everyone h

Re: [newbie] Linux Not for Average Users (Was: Linux for home consumers?)

1999-08-16 Thread chris
>I have been using Linux (Mandrake and Red Hat) sans MS Windows for almost a year >now. We can do anything a windows user can do and more. I did need a book to >learn basics, and everyday I am learning more, not just about Linux use, but >about computers in general. It depends upon what your c