On Friday 09 April 2004 08:57 pm, Owain Sutton wrote:
> JoeHill wrote:
> > On Fri, 09 Apr 2004 15:15:34 +0100
> >
> > Owain Sutton disseminated the following:
> >>Ho-humnow Mandrake claims that the FAT is corrupted, and won't do
> >>any partitioning without wiping the lot. Windows is still OK,
JoeHill wrote:
On Fri, 09 Apr 2004 15:15:34 +0100
Owain Sutton disseminated the following:
Ho-humnow Mandrake claims that the FAT is corrupted, and won't do
any partitioning without wiping the lot. Windows is still OK, though.
Any more ideas?
Did you get rid of the FAT32 partitions (3
On Fri, 2004-04-09 at 23:55, et wrote:
> so is this a fork, or just the new name for the 2.6.x kernel version of the
> drity old MANdrake version?
Nah - it's a "phourk".
stephen kuhn - owner
==
illawarra computer services
a kuhn media australia company
http://kma.0ca
On Fri, 09 Apr 2004 15:15:34 +0100
Owain Sutton disseminated the following:
> Ho-humnow Mandrake claims that the FAT is corrupted, and won't do
> any partitioning without wiping the lot. Windows is still OK, though.
> Any more ideas?
as an absolute *last resort*, and this in not the 'reco
On Fri, 09 Apr 2004 15:15:34 +0100
Owain Sutton disseminated the following:
> Ho-humnow Mandrake claims that the FAT is corrupted, and won't do
> any partitioning without wiping the lot. Windows is still OK, though.
> Any more ideas?
Did you get rid of the FAT32 partitions (3 and 4) in XP
Owain Sutton wrote:
JoeHill wrote:
On Fri, 09 Apr 2004 12:42:52 +0100
Owain Sutton disseminated the following:
That's pretty much what I did, although I didn't describe it well.
I had four partitions, with Windows in the first and windows
programs and stuff in the second. The third and fou
JoeHill wrote:
On Fri, 09 Apr 2004 12:42:52 +0100
Owain Sutton disseminated the following:
That's pretty much what I did, although I didn't describe it well. I
had four partitions, with Windows in the first and windows programs and
stuff in the second. The third and fourth were empty FAT32s
On Friday 09 April 2004 02:42 am, Stephen Kuhn wrote:
> On Fri, 2004-04-09 at 16:14, JoeHill wrote:
> > Whatever happened to that Mandrake-based pr0n distro we were going to put
> > out, you know, the one that comes on like 4 DVD's (hmmm, poor choice of
> > words there).
> >
> > I always thought th
On Friday 09 April 2004 02:14 am, JoeHill wrote:
> On Fri, 09 Apr 2004 15:25:14 +1000
>
> Stephen Kuhn disseminated the following:
> > And pr0n.
>
> Well, that goes without saying doesn't it? 'Sides, Linux, and Mandrake in
> particular, are highly optimized for pr0n, esp with the low latency kernel
On Fri, 09 Apr 2004 12:42:52 +0100
Owain Sutton disseminated the following:
> That's pretty much what I did, although I didn't describe it well. I
> had four partitions, with Windows in the first and windows programs and
> stuff in the second. The third and fourth were empty FAT32s. I booted
JoeHill wrote:
On Fri, 09 Apr 2004 10:56:30 +1000
Stephen Kuhn disseminated the following:
I installed Mandrake 10 onto spare space on my main hard drive, which
has XP in the first partition. Everything went fine on the Linux side -
but choosing Windows from the boot options caused a freeze,
On Fri, 2004-04-09 at 16:14, JoeHill wrote:
> Whatever happened to that Mandrake-based pr0n distro we were going to put out,
> you know, the one that comes on like 4 DVD's (hmmm, poor choice of words there).
>
> I always thought that was a great idea, all you need is the kernel, XFree, video
> an
On April 8, 2004 05:17 pm, Owain Sutton wrote:
> Extreme newbie here..
>
> I installed Mandrake 10 onto spare space on my main hard drive, which
> has XP in the first partition. Everything went fine on the Linux side -
> but choosing Windows from the boot options caused a freeze, with a
> flas
On Fri, 09 Apr 2004 15:25:14 +1000
Stephen Kuhn disseminated the following:
> And pr0n.
Well, that goes without saying doesn't it? 'Sides, Linux, and Mandrake in
particular, are highly optimized for pr0n, esp with the low latency kernel :-D
Whatever happened to that Mandrake-based pr0n distro we
eHill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, April 08, 2004 21:30
Subject: Re: [newbie] Mandrake 10 destroying Windows XP boot
> On Fri, 09 Apr 2004 10:56:30 +1000
> Stephen Kuhn disseminated the following:
>
> > > I installed Mandrake 10 onto
On Fri, 2004-04-09 at 12:30, JoeHill wrote:
> > EZiest way - DELETE XP.
>
> Can't argue with that.
>
> However, if you really must keep XP around, do the install by booting from the
> Mandrake CD *after* you have XP installed (leave some unpartitioned space, at
> least 5 or 6 GB). Sounds from wh
On Fri, 09 Apr 2004 10:56:30 +1000
Stephen Kuhn disseminated the following:
> > I installed Mandrake 10 onto spare space on my main hard drive, which
> > has XP in the first partition. Everything went fine on the Linux side -
> > but choosing Windows from the boot options caused a freeze, with
On Fri, 2004-04-09 at 10:17, Owain Sutton wrote:
> Extreme newbie here..
>
> I installed Mandrake 10 onto spare space on my main hard drive, which
> has XP in the first partition. Everything went fine on the Linux side -
> but choosing Windows from the boot options caused a freeze, with a
Extreme newbie here..
I installed Mandrake 10 onto spare space on my main hard drive, which
has XP in the first partition. Everything went fine on the Linux side -
but choosing Windows from the boot options caused a freeze, with a
flashing cursor on black screen. The XP recovery console c
19 matches
Mail list logo
