So speaking as a New Zealander "it is possible to get yesterdays posts today and
post tomorrow so as everyone reads them yesterday".
New Zealand - first to see the light. (Expensive Y2K Advertising campaign)
Cheers
Michael
Carroll Grigsby wrote:
>
> On Monday 25 March 2002 07:07 pm, James Tho
*nods* Ditto. Sunspots. I swear...or cosmic rays.
*Lag basically* :)
Femme
Miark wrote:
>
> Damn right, I have. I've received them out of order, doubles, and
> messages that appear a day after they were posted.
>
> Miark
>
> "James Thomas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> spoke thusly:
>
> > I am just
Michael wrote:
>
> So speaking as a New Zealander "it is possible to get yesterdays posts today and
> post tomorrow so as everyone reads them yesterday".
>
> New Zealand - first to see the light. (Expensive Y2K Advertising campaign)
>
> Cheers
> Michael
>
Hm... ya I remember the campaign. No
On Tuesday 26 March 2002 1:42 am, you wrote:
> On Monday 25 March 2002 07:07 pm, James Thomas wrote:
> > I am just wondering if anyone else noticed problems with messages
> > appearing in bizarre order, the original message appears a day or so
> > after the replies. Is there anything I can do stop
I see the lag and some dupes, but never the tomorrow problem. But then
I AM in Australia. Doesn't everything get converted back to GMT or
something then presented in your local time? Maybe different e-mail
clients are seeing it differenctly? I using evolution.
Brian
On Tue, 2002-03-26 at 12:
I am just wondering if anyone else noticed problems with messages appearing
in bizarre order, the original message appears a day or so after the
replies. Is there anything I can do stop this (ie: get a new email account
or something? :P) or is it a list problem?
Thanks!
James
___
To add,
I got Miark's response.. and still have never seen James' original post.
Dave
Miark said onto me:
Miark> Damn right, I have. I've received them out of order, doubles, and
Miark> messages that appear a day after they were posted.
Miark>
Miark> Miark
Miark>
Miark>
Miark>
Mi
On Mon, 2002-03-25 at 19:07, James Thomas wrote:
> I am just wondering if anyone else noticed problems with messages appearing
> in bizarre order, the original message appears a day or so after the
> replies. Is there anything I can do stop this (ie: get a new email account
> or something? :P)
Or how about the ones that show up and are dated months ago? lol.
-s
On Monday 25 March 2002 06:26 pm, you wrote:
> Damn right, I have. I've received them out of order, doubles, and
> messages that appear a day after they were posted.
>
> Miark
>
> "James Thomas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> spoke thus
>James:
>It may depend on your e-mail client. I use KMail, and I tell it to sort by
>subject; each posting appears oldest first, based upon when it was posted
>expressed in my local time. IIRC, Netscape does pretty much the same, as do
>most mail clients. Incidentally, one of the side effects is t
- Original Message -
From: "Miark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, March 25, 2002 7:26 PM
Subject: Re: [newbie] Message posts
> Damn right, I have. I've received them out of order, doubles, and
> messages that appear a day
Damn right, I have. I've received them out of order, doubles, and
messages that appear a day after they were posted.
Miark
"James Thomas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> spoke thusly:
> I am just wondering if anyone else noticed problems with messages appearing
> in bizarre order, the original message
12 matches
Mail list logo
