Re: [newbie] OT Why HTML mail is bad

2002-07-09 Thread civileme
Todd Slater wrote: >Somewhere I bookmarked pages that explained why HTML email is bad, but >I'll be darned if I can find them now. I recall getting some of them >from this list, so if you've got a page you share with folks to help >explain why HTML mail is bad, could you share it? You can respond

Re: [newbie] OT Why HTML mail is bad

2002-07-08 Thread Randy Kramer
Todd Slater wrote: > Somewhere I bookmarked pages that explained why HTML email is bad, but > I'll be darned if I can find them now. I recall getting some of them > from this list, so if you've got a page you share with folks to help > explain why HTML mail is bad, could you share it? You can resp

Re: [newbie] OT Why HTML mail is bad

2002-07-08 Thread Alastair Scott
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Monday 08 July 2002 8:18 pm, Todd Slater wrote: > Somewhere I bookmarked pages that explained why HTML email is bad, > but I'll be darned if I can find them now. I recall getting some of > them from this list, so if you've got a page you share with

Re: [newbie] OT Why HTML mail is bad

2002-07-08 Thread Richard
quot;Todd Slater" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 8:18 PM Subject: [newbie] OT Why HTML mail is bad > Somewhere I bookmarked pages that explained why HTML email is bad, but > I'll be darned if I can find them now. I recall gett

[newbie] OT Why HTML mail is bad

2002-07-08 Thread Todd Slater
Somewhere I bookmarked pages that explained why HTML email is bad, but I'll be darned if I can find them now. I recall getting some of them from this list, so if you've got a page you share with folks to help explain why HTML mail is bad, could you share it? You can respond off-list if you like, I