On Tue, 29 Mar 2005 07:39:23 -0500
"Mr. Geek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Thanks, I'm looking at them. OpenCRX deserves a shot too. I think
> > it is closer to ogo and appears to be open source, although not gpl.
> >
> > Lee
>
> Let me know how it goes Lee.
Will do.
_
Lee Wiggers wrote:
On Tue, 29 Mar 2005 07:06:08 -0500
"Mr. Geek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Lee Wiggers wrote:
On Mon, 28 Mar 2005 20:50:11 -0500
"Mr. Geek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
et wrote:
On Monday 28 March 2005 12:51 am, Lee Wiggers wrote:
I would sure like to talk or chat with someone w
On Tue, 29 Mar 2005 07:06:08 -0500
"Mr. Geek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Lee Wiggers wrote:
> > On Mon, 28 Mar 2005 20:50:11 -0500
> > "Mr. Geek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >>et wrote:
> >>
> >>>On Monday 28 March 2005 12:51 am, Lee Wiggers wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> I would sure like
Lee Wiggers wrote:
On Mon, 28 Mar 2005 20:50:11 -0500
"Mr. Geek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
et wrote:
On Monday 28 March 2005 12:51 am, Lee Wiggers wrote:
I would sure like to talk or chat with someone who has an
OpenGroupware server running successfully.
Lee
let us know how it goes...
Lee; I wen
On Mon, 28 Mar 2005 20:50:11 -0500
"Mr. Geek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> et wrote:
> > On Monday 28 March 2005 12:51 am, Lee Wiggers wrote:
> >
> >>I would sure like to talk or chat with someone who has an
> >>OpenGroupware server running successfully.
> >>
> >>Lee
> >
> > let us know how it g
et wrote:
On Monday 28 March 2005 12:51 am, Lee Wiggers wrote:
I would sure like to talk or chat with someone who has an
OpenGroupware server running successfully.
Lee
let us know how it goes...
Lee; I went a few rounds with OpenGroupware and couldn't get it to work.
I switched over to Egroupware
On Monday 28 March 2005 12:51 am, Lee Wiggers wrote:
> I would sure like to talk or chat with someone who has an
> OpenGroupware server running successfully.
>
> Lee
let us know how it goes...
--
linux counter #167806 (http://counter.li.org/)
website="http://ed-tharp.kicks-ass.org";
_
I would sure like to talk or chat with someone who has an
OpenGroupware server running successfully.
Lee
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Join the Club : http://www.mandrakeclub.com
__
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 28 Feb 2005 03:02, jdow wrote:
> Did I say too much and get knocked off the list or did it REALLY go
> silent all of a sudden.
>
> {O.O}
10:45GMT this arrived, Joanne.
Anne
- --
Registered Linux User No.293302 (http://counter.li.org/)
Have
On Sunday 27 February 2005 10:02 pm, jdow wrote:
> Did I say too much and get knocked off the list or did it REALLY go
> silent all of a sudden.
>
> {O.O}
it's your bad breath (smells like chewing tobacco) everyone just moved back a
foot or two in case you spit...
just kidding, we all still here
Did I say too much and get knocked off the list or did it REALLY go
silent all of a sudden.
{O.O}
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Join the Club : http://www.mandrakeclub.com
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Will Scott Naylor, who contributed to the TWiki in October 2003, please
contact me?
Anne
- --
Registered Linux User No.293302
Have you visited http://twiki.mdklinuxfaq.org yet? Mandrake at all levels
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.
There is a broken link in your section of
http://mandrake.vmlinuz.ca/bin/view/Main/MaiL
Anne
--
Registered Linux User No.293302
Have you visited http://twiki.mdklinuxfaq.org yet? Mandrake at all levels
Want to buy your Pack or Services from
You won't likely find a 19" LCD panel that has a refresh rate of less
than 20ms that's affordable. For some reason panel manufacturers
haven't gotten their sh** together with the 19" panels yet, so shoot
for a 17" panel (can be had for $200-$300) or go all out for the Dell
FP2001 which can be had
On Tuesday 09 Nov 2004 19:17, Manaxus wrote:
> I use a 17" one and it does wonderful. I had absolutely no issues
> running Doom3 on it.
>
Thanks, Manaxus and Frankie. I know the early ones didn't have a very good
refresh rate, but I was pretty sure that it would be better now. The
cheapest stil
I use a 17" one and it does wonderful. I had absolutely no issues
running Doom3 on it.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Anne Wilson
Sent: Tuesday, November 09, 2004 10:50 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [newbie] Ping gamers
I
Anne Wilson wrote:
I've been asked to help specify a box for a gamer, and he is wondering whether
an LCD monitor is capable these days of keeping up with games. Can anyone
tell me whether they use one?
Anne
I play many games on my Dell Inspiron 5150 with its 1600x1200 LCD and I
must say I've b
I've been asked to help specify a box for a gamer, and he is wondering whether
an LCD monitor is capable these days of keeping up with games. Can anyone
tell me whether they use one?
Anne
--
Registered Linux User No.293302
Have you visited http://twiki.mdklinuxfaq.org yet?
___
Derek, I am sure you can help me configure my wireless card under 10.0
Official. I haven't had much luck with feedback from the list, but here it
goes my original post:
&&
Hello:
I just erased Mandrake 9.2 because I could never configure access to
Internet, and installed 10.0 officia
On Tue, 6 Jul 2004 20:53:51 -0400
Bryan Phinney wrote:
> Charles, is your repository setup for rsync by any chance.
No, it is not, but I may look into the feasibility on making it so; just
have not gotten around to it yet.
Charles
--
The reason why worry kills more people than work is t
Charles, is your repository setup for rsync by any chance. I was hoping to
figure out a way to save you bandwidth, I have several machines and I am
pretty much installing your packages on all of them. I just used wget to
mirror the directory down but I am not sure that will handle deletions as
On Wed, 30 Jun 2004 14:20:36 -0400
Todd Slater disseminated the following:
> or better yet pekwm (that was just to see if Joe is paying attention ;)
Oh yeah, I'm here. Always watching...alwaaays watching
--
JoeHill RLU #282046 / www.orderinchaos.org
19:25:10 up 1 day, 21:55, 4 user
- Original Message -
From: zamri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 03:21:58 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: [newbie] ping Steven Kuhn: Gnome 2.6
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It's nice actually to have a distro that is lean and mean targeted for
older computers. Can u imagine if w
It's nice actually to have a distro that is lean and mean targeted for older computers. Can u imagine if we run it on newer computers ? but it is optimized for newer CPUs. That's where Mandrake excels .Todd Slater <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Just an FYI-I downloaded Slackware 10 to try since it come
On Friday 09 January 2004 19:47, jpearl24 wrote:
> On Fri, 2004-01-09 at 08:13, Anne Wilson wrote:
> > Jason, why do all your messages arrive with a 'signature is bad'
> > warning?
> >
> > Anne
>
> hmmm i dont know ill have to check into that i know i have it
> uploaded to alotta keyservers. but th
On Fri, 2004-01-09 at 08:13, Anne Wilson wrote:
> Jason, why do all your messages arrive with a 'signature is bad'
> warning?
>
> Anne
hmmm i dont know ill have to check into that i know i have it uploaded
to alotta keyservers. but that doesnt have to do with it... maybe my key
is corrupted in th
On Friday 09 January 2004 15:13, Anne Wilson wrote:
> Jason, why do all your messages arrive with a 'signature is bad'
> warning?
>
> Anne
Correction, Jason. Only some of your messages have bad signatures.
Anne
--
Registered Linux User No.293302
Have you visited http://twiki.mdklinuxfaq.org yet
Jason, why do all your messages arrive with a 'signature is bad'
warning?
Anne
--
Registered Linux User No.293302
Have you visited http://twiki.mdklinuxfaq.org yet?
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
I have been having problems with receiving from the list, and with searching
for another addy.
If you posted a reply of my last post, I would appreciate if you could post
it again. It seems I am receiving now. If you would click in "reply all" I
would have a copy as a personal email, which would b
On Sunday 19 Oct 2003 11:51 pm, Jerry Barton wrote:
> Anne,
>
> it's in ~/.kde/share/config/kopeterc
>
> Just change AutoConnect=true to =false
>
> Hope that's what you're lookin' for :-)
>
> Jerry
Bingo. Yup - now I can use it for icq and forget msn until I actually
need it. Thanks, Jerry
Ann
>
> part again, or to use gaim or licq until it's sorted. Personally I
> wouldn't bother with msn anyway, but it's the only way to get a word
> in edgewise when I need to get a message to the grandchildren
>
Gaim 0.71 works well and is a lot less bug prone IMHO. Don't have any trouble
connec
Anne, try using "texstar" kopete rpm.. before I installed it I could not
connect but after the install... no problem. do you know PLF? if so go there
and "addmedia" for textstar.. here's the url
http://plf.zarb.org/~nanardon/
just follow the directions.. its quite simple
HTH.
Grasshopper
On
On Sunday 19 Oct 2003 8:07 pm, Lanman wrote:
> Anne; MSN upgraded their system to prevent people like us
> connecting to their service. It seems that they were unable
> to strip usable info from us (just a guess)!
> Kopete is working on a new version to fix the problem.
>
> Lanman
>
Hi, Lanman. Ye
Anne; MSN upgraded their system to prevent people like us
connecting to their service. It seems that they were unable
to strip usable info from us (just a guess)!
Kopete is working on a new version to fix the problem.
Lanman
*** REPLY SEPARATOR ***
On 10/19/2003 at 7:12 PM Anne
Anyone able to tell me where I can find the config file that sets auto
connect? I have not been able to start the program since the 15th,
as it tries to autoconnect to msn the segfaults.
Anne
--
Registered Linux User No.293302
Have you visited http://twiki.mdklinuxfaq.org yet?
Want to buy yo
On Wednesday 10 September 2003 09:00 pm, Trey Sizemore wrote:
> ping
64 bytes from www.fastmail.fm (66.111.4.62): icmp_seq=1 ttl=53 time=124 ms
64 bytes from www.fastmail.fm (66.111.4.62): icmp_seq=2 ttl=53 time=49.8 ms
64 bytes from www.fastmail.fm (66.111.4.62): icmp_seq=3 ttl=53 time=50.8 ms
64
Todd Slater wrote:
On Fri, Sep 05, 2003 at 07:02:19PM +, John Richard Smith wrote:
I guess my camera doesn't give the correct info to achieve the end result,
ah well, never mind , at least now I can change the prefix at will
without having to manually do it all. thanks.
You don't hav
On Fri, Sep 05, 2003 at 07:02:19PM +, John Richard Smith wrote:
>
> I guess my camera doesn't give the correct info to achieve the end result,
> ah well, never mind , at least now I can change the prefix at will
> without having to manually do it all. thanks.
You don't have exif installed.
Todd Slater wrote:
On Fri, Sep 05, 2003 at 11:36:10AM +, John Richard Smith wrote:
You do not have to add anything after the "-d" as it calls exif to read
the date imprint left by the camera (exif header). IOW, when you take a
picture the camera includes metadata about it (date and time t
Todd Slater wrote:
On Fri, Sep 05, 2003 at 11:36:10AM +, John Richard Smith wrote:
Todd Slater wrote:
As it currently stands, calling the script with "-n yourname" names
pictures "yourname-001.jpg, yourname-002.jpg" etc.
Calling it with "-d" names pictures "-MM-DD-001.jpg" etc.
C
On Fri, Sep 05, 2003 at 11:36:10AM +, John Richard Smith wrote:
> Todd Slater wrote:
>
> >As it currently stands, calling the script with "-n yourname" names
> >pictures "yourname-001.jpg, yourname-002.jpg" etc.
> >
> >Calling it with "-d" names pictures "-MM-DD-001.jpg" etc.
> >
> >Callin
Todd Slater wrote:
The last script I sent was garbage. This is much cleaner and more
efficient.
As it currently stands, calling the script with "-n yourname" names
pictures "yourname-001.jpg, yourname-002.jpg" etc.
Calling it with "-d" names pictures "-MM-DD-001.jpg" etc.
Calling it with "-n
Todd Slater wrote:
Hi John,
On Mon, Sep 01, 2003 at 10:20:26AM +, John Richard Smith wrote:
Todd Slater wrote:
The last script I sent was garbage. This is much cleaner and more
efficient.
As it currently stands, calling the script with "-n yourname" names
pictures "yourname-001.jpg,
Hi John,
On Mon, Sep 01, 2003 at 10:20:26AM +, John Richard Smith wrote:
> Todd Slater wrote:
>
> >The last script I sent was garbage. This is much cleaner and more
> >efficient.
> >
> >As it currently stands, calling the script with "-n yourname" names
> >pictures "yourname-001.jpg, yourname
The last script I sent was garbage. This is much cleaner and more
efficient.
As it currently stands, calling the script with "-n yourname" names
pictures "yourname-001.jpg, yourname-002.jpg" etc.
Calling it with "-d" names pictures "-MM-DD-001.jpg" etc.
Calling it with "-n yourname -d" names
See if this doesn't do something like you want. I pulled it out of my
getpix script and made it a strictly renaming script. Works OK for me
now.
Todd
renamer.sh
Description: Bourne shell script
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
> If your machine is reasonably current (300Mhz or faster, 128MB+ RAM),
> then I would have to suspect a distributed attack via a virus or worm.
Maybe. There were a large number of different, seemingly random, hosts
all trying port 4156. Portsentry seems to be the way to get rid of these,
and all
om: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Lyvim Xaphir
Sent: Sunday, 22 September 2002 10:58 AM
To: NewbieMandrake-List
Subject: Re: [newbie] ping flood?
On Sat, 2002-09-21 at 21:09, dfox wrote:
> Gretts *
>
> I came home today to my box noticing that a large number o
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
dfox wrote:
| Gretts *
|
| I came home today to my box noticing that a large number of httpd
| processes being spawned (this isn't a server, at least not really),
| and for the last hours or so my box is real slow when it comes to
| using the net.
|
|
On Sat, 2002-09-21 at 21:09, dfox wrote:
> Gretts *
>
> I came home today to my box noticing that a large number of httpd
> processes being spawned (this isn't a server, at least not really),
> and for the last hours or so my box is real slow when it comes to
> using the net.
>
> I'm on a DSL li
Gretts *
I came home today to my box noticing that a large number of httpd
processes being spawned (this isn't a server, at least not really),
and for the last hours or so my box is real slow when it comes to
using the net.
I'm on a DSL line and am getting some errors connecting to sites
and suc
Dear Brian,
Thank you for your answer. I will gather the info you asked for within the
next few days and send in. I know Samba cannot work right if I cannot even
Ping. Of course the networking works fine on the vmware Win95 side. Thank
you for your attention on this matter.
Sincerely,
Marci
Marcia,
If you can't ping, then samba is certainly going to have problems. Are
you able to post some details of the IP addresses, subnet mask etc. i.e.
Give us a feel for how you have things set up?
Brian
On Tue, 2002-03-19 at 03:32, Marcia wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> I cannot ping my vmware Window
Dear All,
I cannot ping my vmware Windows95 guest from my LM8.1. I can ping my Linux
from the Windows95, but I cannot reach the machine from Linux. Even so, the
networking in Win95 is working well. I can see my machine and do anything
with all of my Linux files within the vmware Windows. Howev
Dear All,
I have LM8.1 with vmware2.04 running win95 as guest. I have the vmware-samba
setup with host-only networking so that I can share the Linux files and
directories in Network Neighborhood. That is working however I am having a
time getting things to work on the Linux side so that I may
I think this would block pings, but I'm sure there are other ways, much
better, to block ping request. A firewall should handle that for you.
As far as it preventing you from pinging other machines, it won't affect
you. If you block the port, it will not accept packets at that level,
it has not
I *think* that port 7 being the echo port is reserved for ping related
packets. If I closed off that port who I appear unreachable, request timed
out? Would I be able to ping others if I closed that port? Would there be any
other adverse effects?
Hello Edmund,
I have a fresh installation of LM 8.0 running on my laptop. I poked
around a bit to see if I could use MySQL, as it was installed with the OS.
You should be able to see the two default databases with the following
command:
[me@mySystem /]$ mysqlshow
This should produce output th
Hello all
I'm trying to take my first steps with either MySQL or PostgreSQL, and the
documentation at those websites, while great, is hard to follow from a
Mandrake perspective (it seems the files are in different places from what
those websites say is customary, and there must be some small set
Sounds like a firewall issue. Do you have something like Norton's
Internet Security running? It will not all echo requests so you won't
get a response from the host whe pinging that machine.
Try to telnet to the Linux box. If you can get through, then it's most
likely an issue like that. Allo
a couple of possibilities, might be you got ping no running?? might be a
firewall issue? and hey, what are you doing wrong anyway/
On Saturday 28 July 2001 10:44, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> OK, I got my netwqork set up all good, and when I ping the Linux server
> from the windows box it wont go,
EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [newbie] Ping doesn't respond
II installed PMFirewall and then tried to ping AT&T but it stalled?
PING www.att.com (192.20.3.54): 56 octets data
and it just sits there. I can access the internet but I can't ping. I
didn't change any of the sett
II installed PMFirewall and then tried to ping AT&T but it stalled?
PING www.att.com (192.20.3.54): 56 octets data
and it just sits there. I can access the internet but I can't ping. I
didn't change any of the settings in LinxConf because this is a standalone
pc. Any idea what I am doing w
uptle
/ / _
---/ / (_)__ __ __
--/ /__/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ /
-//_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\
Gshop & Network Payment Solutions.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, 3 April 2001 2:37 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [newbie] pin
Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, April 02, 2001 12:24 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [newbie] ping doesn't ping
>
> I've tried to connect mywindows 95 and mandrake 7.1 but i don't get a
> respo
PROTECTED]
Subject: [newbie] ping doesn't ping
I've tried to connect mywindows 95 and mandrake 7.1 but i don't get a
response from neither computer. What I mean is that I am able to ping
each macine to its own IP address ( i can even ping web site from each
machine) but when trying
I've tried to connect mywindows 95 and mandrake 7.1 but i don't get a
response from neither computer. What I mean is that I am able to ping
each macine to its own IP address ( i can even ping web site from each
machine) but when trying to ping the other machine in my LAN it does not
work. I chec
congrats man.
s wrote:
>
> Hey dude. Guess what?!
>
> I got them NVidia drivers loaded!!! I can't believe it. I can play Chromiun
> and Gltron now. I need to adjust my fonts now. They are all a little
> smaller, but success on a day that I was becoming so frustrated. I wasn't
> getting s
t; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2001 12:44 PM
Subject: Re: [newbie] ping IP
> You got me on that one Dan ! Er,..Sorry Dr. D. !
>
> Dan LaBine
> Registered Linux User #190712
>
> - Original Message -
> From: &qu
You got me on that one Dan ! Er,..Sorry Dr. D. !
Dan LaBine
Registered Linux User #190712
- Original Message -
From: "Dan Belkie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2001 12:38 PM
Subject: [newbie] ping IP
>
> He
Hey dude. Guess what?!
I got them NVidia drivers loaded!!! I can't believe it. I can play Chromiun
and Gltron now. I need to adjust my fonts now. They are all a little
smaller, but success on a day that I was becoming so frustrated. I wasn't
getting sh*t done. No luck with glibc 2.2, ev
Hey Guys!
ok I have set up a Mandrake corp 7.1 and all seems to be fine.
I have 2 network cards in the box and they booth were found.
I have one set to my DSL line. Internet works fine.. the other one I have
set to 192.168.0.100.
I can ping 192.168.0.100 from the local box.
I cant ping from anot
You'd better try explaining it better if you expect any help that might
help. Let's dissect it:
-Original Message-
From: SoloCDM [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 22, 2000 12:00 PM
To: Linux-Mandrake Newbie
Subject: [newbie] Ping Error
Something is seriously
Something is seriously wrong with our network. A station with Win
9x still believes another workstation exists, even though the other
workstation is disconnected. When it was connected, I was able
to use the other workstation to view the files of the workstation
in question.
Next, I tried to pi
Pong ;)
> Testing. One ping only.
>
> Bob
--
,
(o o)
+--oOOO--(_)---+
| |
|H E L L M U T |
| |
| www.fegefeuer-webzine.de |
| |
+-0OOO-+
Testing. One ping only.
Bob
76 matches
Mail list logo