On Thursday 24 July 2003 07:01 pm, Aron Smith wrote:
> On Friday 25 July 2003 03:37 am, H.J.Bathoorn wrote:
> > On Friday 25 July 2003 10:49, Sharrea wrote:
> > > Difference is likely one takes the cache into account while the other
> > > is reporting without cache. There is nothing to worry about
On Friday 25 July 2003 10:49, Sharrea wrote:
>
> Difference is likely one takes the cache into account while the other is
> reporting without cache. There is nothing to worry about. Linux stores a
> lot in cache but releases what is required when needed (like opening
> another app). This way Li
> On Friday 25 July 2003 02:05 am, crak600 wrote:
> > ok, i was tooling around and decided to see how much ram i was
> > currently using. i have 768mb installed and linux knows it (running a
> > 950 processor, decent speed combo). so i look at i'm fluctuating
> > between 5 and 20mb of free ram le
i just fired up ksim and it says i've got 588M physical ram free. but why is
there a discrepancy between what it says when i check memory and in ksim?
any ideas?
On Friday 25 July 2003 02:05 am, crak600 wrote:
> ok, i was tooling around and decided to see how much ram i was currently
> using
ok, i was tooling around and decided to see how much ram i was currently
using. i have 768mb installed and linux knows it (running a 950 processor,
decent speed combo). so i look at i'm fluctuating between 5 and 20mb of free
ram left. so i think this just can't be right, i mean, to use up ALL
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Greg Meyer
Sent: Saturday, February 08, 2003 1:19 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [newbie] RAM Questions
On Saturday 08 February 2003 12:44 pm, Russ wrote:
> okay, I do have onboard video but I h
On Saturday 08 February 2003 12:44 pm, Russ wrote:
> okay, I do have onboard video but I have an agp video card installed. I
> wonder is MD is getting confused? (it did fined my agp card though).
> Anyway, next time I install MD I will look at the ram and see what it is
> seeing.
>
> I am experimen
On Saturday 08 February 2003 09:24 am, Russ wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I understand that the swap partition should be about twice that of your
> physical ram. I have 256megs and when I allow MD to partition itself, that
> is the size of the swap partition it makes. Shouldn't it be 512?
>
> I seem to reme
okay, I do have onboard video but I have an agp video card installed. I
wonder is MD is getting confused? (it did fined my agp card though). Anyway,
next time I install MD I will look at the ram and see what it is seeing.
I am experimenting with various configurations with MD9 and RedHat 8. There
On Saturday February 8 2003 10:24 am, Russ wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I understand that the swap partition should be about twice that of
> your physical ram. I have 256megs and when I allow MD to partition
> itself, that is the size of the swap partition it makes. Shouldn't
> it be 512?
>
> I seem to rem
On Saturday 08 February 2003 11:47 am, Gregory K. Meyer, CPA wrote:
> On Saturday 08 February 2003 11:38 am, Gregory K. Meyer, CPA wrote:
> > On Saturday 08 February 2003 11:24 am, Russ wrote:
> > > Hi All,
> > >
> > > I understand that the swap partition should be about twice that of your
> > > ph
On Saturday 08 February 2003 11:57 am, Adolfo Bello wrote:
> At this moment I am recompiling the kernel (for the third times this
> week :-( due to a problem with X not starting) and the swap has already
> been used by the system even when my computer has 512Mb ram (aroound
> 350Mb free acording t
On Sat, 2003-02-08 at 12:38, Gregory K. Meyer, CPA wrote:
> The rule I follow is
>
> 2x RAM when physical RAM is 128MB or less;
> 1x RAM when physical RAM is 256MB but greater than 128;
> never a bigger swap than 256MB
>
> In monitoring, I have never had my swap usage get above 80MB when my phy
On Saturday 08 February 2003 11:38 am, Gregory K. Meyer, CPA wrote:
> On Saturday 08 February 2003 11:24 am, Russ wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I understand that the swap partition should be about twice that of your
> > physical ram. I have 256megs and when I allow MD to partition itself,
> > that is
Thanks for the response. I'll let MD deal with it then.
Russ
- Original Message -
> On Saturday 08 February 2003 11:24 am, Russ wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I understand that the swap partition should be about twice that of your
> > physical ram. I have 256megs and when I allow MD to partiti
On Saturday 08 February 2003 11:24 am, Russ wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I understand that the swap partition should be about twice that of your
> physical ram. I have 256megs and when I allow MD to partition itself, that
> is the size of the swap partition it makes. Shouldn't it be 512?
>
> I seem to reme
Hi All,
I understand that the swap partition should be about twice that of your
physical ram. I have 256megs and when I allow MD to partition itself, that
is the size of the swap partition it makes. Shouldn't it be 512?
I seem to remember (from previous tries in the past) that there was an issue
How do i cat my ram? My brother did it in a bash shell and it was wierd,
where is it located or do i have to run some sort of program?
_
Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com
Want to buy your Pack
EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [newbie] Ram .. Where is it going ??
Last Sunday there was a post from Steve Flynn about 'unused memory':
As for seeing all of you memory in Use under Linux, this is perfectly
normal, and it a GOOD thing - Linux uses as much memory as
I have an SMP PIII system running Mandrake 8.1 with (was 512M ram) however
while working on an image in the GIMP i was shocked to discovered my ram was
at 99% and 7% swap. OK the image was 100M in size but what about the rest.
After i have finished and have closed down GIMP etc not all my ram r
'll be building my next
one, so I know exactly what's in it.
Thanks for the answer's, I know it wasn't exactly Linux related, but cheers
anyway!
-Original Message-
From: Tom Brinkman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 11 September 2001 15:35
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sub
run across is actually the best reason to learn about
hardware, and build your own system.
--
Tom Brinkman Galveston Bay
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Tom Brinkman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 11 September 2001 14:24
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTE
1 14:24
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [newbie] RAM: How much is enough?
On Tuesday 11 September 2001 04:47 am, Adrian Lynch escribió:
> Speaking of RAM, I hope nobody minds me slating a PC company, but it
> needs to be said. I bought a PC from Evesham a while back, it should
> have co
On Tuesday 11 September 2001 04:47 am, Adrian Lynch escribió:
> Speaking of RAM, I hope nobody minds me slating a PC company, but it
> needs to be said. I bought a PC from Evesham a while back, it should
> have come with 128Mb PC133 SDRAM, just opened it up lastnight, and
> what do I find? Two 64M
cient for this sort of stuff??
>
>
> rgsd
>
> Frank
>
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Brandon Caudle
> Sent: Tuesday, 11 September 2001 7:23 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: R
On Tuesday 11 September 2001 04:47 am, Adrian Lynch wrote:
> Speaking of RAM, I hope nobody minds me slating a PC company, but it needs
> to be said. I bought a PC from Evesham a while back, it should have come
> with 128Mb PC133 SDRAM, just opened it up lastnight, and what do I find?
> Two 64Mb
audle
Sent: Tuesday, 11 September 2001 7:23 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [newbie] RAM: How much is enough?
If you talking about how much ram is necessary, I feel there is never
enough, I have 768meg of PC133, and Suse Still uses 400meg of swap. With
200 days+ up time its a little excusab
If you talking about how much ram is necessary, I feel there is never enough, I have
768meg of PC133, and Suse Still uses 400meg of swap. With 200 days+ up time its a
little excusable, but if your building a server, that has a required uptime, Get the
max you can afford!
~Brandon Caudle
>Ad
Speaking of RAM, I hope nobody minds me slating a PC company, but it needs
to be said. I bought a PC from Evesham a while back, it should have come
with 128Mb PC133 SDRAM, just opened it up lastnight, and what do I find? Two
64Mb chips, one PC133 the other PC100.
Not a happy bunny, see >> :o(
Whats the problem? Unless of course you're after some older memory
> type!
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Warren Post [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 04 September 2001 04:14
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [newbie] RAM: How much is enough?
>
>
> I wi
I wish I had read the other answers before sending that last one. Sorry :o(
-Original Message-
From: Warren Post [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 04 September 2001 04:14
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [newbie] RAM: How much is enough?
I will be installing LM8.0 on two PCs as soon as I
bject: [newbie] RAM: How much is enough?
I will be installing LM8.0 on two PCs as soon as I finish downloading
it. I know I need to get more RAM, but how much is enough?
Box 1 is a Celeron 366 MHz with 32 MB, box 2 is a K5 100 MHz with 16 MB.
Both will be used for public Internet access: IceWM, Konquero
ECTED]
|Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
|[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Subject: Re: [newbie] RAM: How much is enough?
|
|
|I maintain a collection of interesting quotes. Whenever I come
|across something I like, I add it to the collection. Some of
|them make great e-mail signatures :-)
|
|On Thu, 6 S
PROTECTED]
|Subject: Re: [newbie] RAM: How much is enough?
|
|
|On Thu, 6 Sep 2001 09:54, Jose M. Sanchez wrote:
|> That one is right up there with memorable sayings from CEO's...
|>
|> Another of my favorites was DEC's CEO saying that no one would ever
|> have or toler
he auditorium was being rendered in _real-time_ by a GeForce 3 in a
Mac. Simply amazing.
> -JMS
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> |-Original Message-
> |From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> |[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Sridhar
> |Dhanapalan
> |Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2001 8
D]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Subject: Re: [newbie] RAM: How much is enough?
|
|
|Perhaps you mean this little quote:
|
|"640K ought to be enough for anybody." -- Bill Gates, 1981
|
|On Wed, 5 Sep 2001 22:21, Jose M. Sanchez wrote:
|> Didn't someone once say that 640K of Ram was more than
Well said.
Arthur H. Johnson II
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The Linux Box
http://www.linuxbox.nu
On Wed, 5 Sep 2001, etharp wrote:
> "enough RAM" and "Enough Money" are myths. they do not really exist, you
> always want more.
>
> On Tuesday 04 September 2001 17:08, Charles Punch wrote:
> > "Arthur H. Jo
|-Original Message-
> |From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> |[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of etharp
> |Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2001 7:00 AM
> |To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Charles Punch;
> |[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> |Subject: Re: [newbie] RAM: How much is enough?
> |
>
> On 05 Sep 2001 14:08:13 +0200, Robert MacLean wrote:
> > I think so.If I remember right they work for Microsoft now on
> > something called Windows Memory Management ;)
> >
> > > Didn't someone once say that 640K of Ram was more than anyone would
> > ever
> > > need?
>
> The infamous Bill
"enough RAM" and "Enough Money" are myths. they do not really exist, you
always want more.
On Tuesday 04 September 2001 17:08, Charles Punch wrote:
> "Arthur H. Johnson II" wrote:
> > I would recommend 128 Megs. You may be able to get away with 64 on the
> > k5.
> >
> > Arthur H. Johnson II
> >
"Arthur H. Johnson II" wrote:
>
> I would recommend 128 Megs. You may be able to get away with 64 on the
> k5.
>
> Arthur H. Johnson II
> On Mon, 3 Sep 2001, Warren Post wrote:
>
> > I will be installing LM8.0 on two PCs as soon as I finish downloading
> > it. I know I need to get more RAM, b
For that price you can migrate to Duron!
Arthur H. Johnson II
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The Linux Box
http://www.linuxbox.nu
On Tue, 4 Sep 2001, Matt Greer wrote:
> on 9/4/01 11:18 AM, Mark Johnson at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Warren, I know we are all on a budget but RAM is dirt cheap right now.
on 9/4/01 11:18 AM, Mark Johnson at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Warren, I know we are all on a budget but RAM is dirt cheap right now... you
> can get a 256MB for about $33 now...
That's true for RAM intended for recent computers. But if a computer uses
SIMMs and such, it's not so cheap. A 128MB
stuff...
> http://www.microchipcomputers.com/
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Arthur H. Johnson II [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 11:10 AM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: [newbie] RAM: How much is enough?
> &
son II [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 11:10 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [newbie] RAM: How much is enough?
>
>
>
> I would recommend 128 Megs. You may be able to get away with
> 64 on the
> k5.
>
> Arthur H. Johnson
I would recommend 128 Megs. You may be able to get away with 64 on the
k5.
Arthur H. Johnson II
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The Linux Box
http://www.linuxbox.nu
On Mon, 3 Sep 2001, Warren Post wrote:
> I will be installing LM8.0 on two PCs as soon as I finish downloading
> it. I know I need to get more
on 9/3/01 10:13 PM, Warren Post at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I will be installing LM8.0 on two PCs as soon as I finish downloading
> it. I know I need to get more RAM, but how much is enough?
>
> Box 1 is a Celeron 366 MHz with 32 MB, box 2 is a K5 100 MHz with 16 MB.
> Both will be used for pu
ginal Message -
From: "Warren Post" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 5:13 AM
Subject: [newbie] RAM: How much is enough?
> I will be installing LM8.0 on two PCs as soon as I finish
downloading
> it. I know I need to get
I will be installing LM8.0 on two PCs as soon as I finish downloading
it. I know I need to get more RAM, but how much is enough?
Box 1 is a Celeron 366 MHz with 32 MB, box 2 is a K5 100 MHz with 16 MB.
Both will be used for public Internet access: IceWM, Konqueror and/or
Netscape, KOffice and/or
On Thursday 14 June 2001 10:52, Gunner Carstens wrote:
> > Hmmm,
> >
> > It would be unusual if the RAM weren't nearly full
> > regardless. The linux kernel believes unused memory is
> > wasted memory. Memory full is a NORMAL condition.
> >
> > Let's see what your hardware is. If you have an MVP3
but you DO have some swap space allocated on your hard disk, haven't you?
On Tuesday 12 June 2001 23:23, you wrote:
> I'm using a Mandrake 7.2 on a Pentium 3 with 128MB RAM, on a newly
> installed system. I found it a bit slow and quite a bit of the programs -
> like KDE mediaplayer - won´t star
On Wednesday 13 June 2001 09:45, Dave Sherman wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Wednesday 13 June 2001 08:30, thus spake Quaylar:
> > At 23:23 12.06.2001 +0200, you wrote:
> > >I'm using a Mandrake 7.2 on a Pentium 3 with 128MB RAM, on
> > > a newly installed system.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 13 June 2001 08:30, thus spake Quaylar:
> At 23:23 12.06.2001 +0200, you wrote:
> >I'm using a Mandrake 7.2 on a Pentium 3 with 128MB RAM, on a newly
> > installed system. I found it a bit slow and quite a bit of the
> > programs - like K
At 23:23 12.06.2001 +0200, you wrote:
>I'm using a Mandrake 7.2 on a Pentium 3 with 128MB RAM, on a newly installed
>system. I found it a bit slow and quite a bit of the programs - like KDE
>mediaplayer - won´t start up. I found out that with NO programs started
>from the desktop by me, the RAM i
I'm using a Mandrake 7.2 on a Pentium 3 with 128MB RAM, on a newly installed
system. I found it a bit slow and quite a bit of the programs - like KDE
mediaplayer - won´t start up. I found out that with NO programs started
from the desktop by me, the RAM is nearly full!
I can see, that I'm runnin
By the way, I'm also kind da type that waitin for ..
Man, misconfigured yahoo mail platform, dun displays
all messages, therefore one may let nope informed
on wut is goin on from the mails before, that also
the reason for the desperated emails prior, actually
the emails was not filetered out, they
Drak:
RE: nope tried that and it took me to a screen where I had to login(again)
only
this time I had to do it as root. It wouldnt accept my user password.
Install the KDE package and all works fine. ;)
I did ctrl-alt-del from an IceWM screen:
I got a nice little window with 9 choices: shutdown
lt;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, February 16, 2001 9:31 AM
Subject: Re: [newbie] Ram optimization also (IceWM)
> Drak wrote:
>
> >also I use iceWM and cannot figure out how to get it to shut down
> >properly any help would be greatly appeciated...
>
> By accident, I
Drak wrote:
>also I use iceWM and cannot figure out how to get it to shut down
>properly any help would be greatly appeciated...
By accident, I found a nice shutdown window by hitting: ctrl-alt-del
Jacqueline
Shop online without a credit card
http://www.rocketcash.com
RocketCash, a NetZero
ot;Sridhar Dhanapalan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Rem" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2001 9:14 PM
Subject: Re: [newbie] RAM Disk Error
> I had this same problem, and so I burnt another copy from the Mandrake
> ISOs I had download
I had this same problem, and so I burnt another copy from the Mandrake
ISOs I had downloaded. This worked fine, which has led me to believe
that my original copy was burnt incorrectly.
On Fri, 16 Feb 2001 08:37, Rem wrote:
> I have had a very odd problem:
> I have a computer, with Athlon 700 M
I have had a very odd problem:
I have a computer, with Athlon 700 Mhz, 30G HD, and 512MB RAM. I wanted to
put Mandrake 7.2 on it and it will give "ramdisk error" (It can not generate
the ramdisk) at the begining of installation and quit. Any idea why?
The oddest thing perhaps, is that i didn't ha
On Thursday 15 February 2001 20:13, you wrote:
> I red and did the HD optimization... now i was wondering if
> there is any memory ops I could also do?
> Does xwindows really take that much that much ram?
>
> running a abit bx6 r2
> P3 500
> 128 mbs ram
> rage lt pro
> 3com 5909b nic to a dsl rout
I red and did the HD optimization... now i was wondering if there is any
memory ops I could also do?
Does xwindows really take that much that much ram?
running a abit bx6 r2
P3 500
128 mbs ram
rage lt pro
3com 5909b nic to a dsl router (cisco 675)
also I use iceWM and cannot figure out how t
On Saturday 30 December 2000 02:27 pm, you wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Dec 2000, Dennis Myers wrote:
> >only showing 64mg I have added the append = "mem=128" to lilo.conf
> > but it does not seem to have made a difference to what the control center
>
> Did you remember to run lilo as a command after
On Fri, 29 Dec 2000, Dennis Myers wrote:
>only showing 64mg I have added the append = "mem=128" to lilo.conf but
>it does not seem to have made a difference to what the control center
Did you remember to run lilo as a command after the change? (You need to
do this as root).
That will fix
Hi all, I have a fairly stable installation of 7.2 and KDE2.1beta1. My
problem is I just added another 64mb of ram and it shows up on the initial
boot before the OS comes up and it shows up on the control center on hda
which has 7.1 installed. It also shows on the first pixmap on boot (the one
Paul wrote:
>
> On Thu, 23 Nov 2000, chronos . wrote:
>
> >Hi all,
> >Having a ram issue my 7.1 box only sees 64 of my 128. So how do I fix this ? I
>found this on mandrakeuser.org and Im not sure how this works. It said in grub title
>linuxkernel (hda0,0)/boot/vmlinuz root=dev/hda1 mem=12
On Thu, 23 Nov 2000, chronos . wrote:
>Hi all,
>Having a ram issue my 7.1 box only sees 64 of my 128. So how do I fix this ? I found
>this on mandrakeuser.org and Im not sure how this works. It said in grub title linux
> kernel (hda0,0)/boot/vmlinuz root=dev/hda1 mem=128m So Im not sure wher
the mem=128M (note capital M) must be before the root=dev/hda1 I had the
same problem before and that fixed it.
Tweeter
"chronos ." wrote:
>
> Hi all,
> Having a ram issue my 7.1 box only sees 64 of my 128. So how do I fix this ? I found
>this on mandrakeuser.org and Im not sure how this works
Hi all,
Having a ram issue my 7.1 box only sees 64 of my 128. So how do I fix this ? I found
this on mandrakeuser.org and Im not sure how this works. It said in grub title linux
kernel (hda0,0)/boot/vmlinuz root=dev/hda1 mem=128m So Im not sure where to put this
in.
;
h.ozgur cagdas.
>From: Roxane Bennett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: [newbie] RAM hog
>Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2000 00:08:03 -0700
>
>I just installed Linux-mandrake 6.0 and once I'm in the desktop
>environment about 2 to 5
Roxane Bennett wrote:
>
> I just installed Linux-mandrake 6.0 and once I'm in the desktop
> environment about 2 to 5 minutes later the system freezes on me. I can't
> open a program for very long without it freezing up on me. Why is it
> using so much RAM? I have 64MB of RAM. What can I do to op
EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, October 01, 2000 3:08 AM
Subject: [newbie] RAM hog
> I just installed Linux-mandrake 6.0 and once I'm in the desktop
> environment about 2 to 5 minutes later the system freezes on me. I can't
> open a program for very long without it freezing up on
e same amount of memory but
> > different manufacturers so
> > what he thinks makes a lot of sense.
> >
> > Patti
> > Registered Linux User #184611
> >
> >
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Original Message
> &
A V Flinsch wrote:
>
> On Sun, 10 Sep 2000, you wrote:
> > I just checked on my install of 7.0 to double boot with Win98 and found
> > that the installation detected my 128M of ram. Why would it work on my
> > machine when I read that so many others must do the append mem= thing to
> > get their
> And here is the kicker...In Windows I couldn't run more than 800x640 res, while in
>Linux I can go 1024x724. Figure that out, eh?
This is a function of the video drivers you have installed on both
operating systems. You could fix it in Windows but you have to go to
a different conference fo
On Sun, 10 Sep 2000, you wrote:
> I just checked on my install of 7.0 to double boot with Win98 and found
> that the installation detected my 128M of ram. Why would it work on my
> machine when I read that so many others must do the append mem= thing to
> get their RAM recognized? Not complaining,
On Sun, 10 Sep 2000, you wrote:
> I just checked on my install of 7.0 to double boot with Win98 and found
> that the installation detected my 128M of ram. Why would it work on my
> machine when I read that so many others must do the append mem= thing to
> get their RAM recognized? Not complaining,
I know that the 15-16M hole that's in a lot of BIOSes will make it misreport
- Original Message -
From: "Dennis Myers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, September 10, 2000 9:04 AM
Subject: [newbie] RAM Detec
We have identical motherboards and the mobo detects all of my ram -- go
figure ;-)
Patti
Registered Linux User 184611
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Original Message <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
On 9/9/00,
Hi Dennis,
I didn't have any trouble when I installed Mandrake on my machine at
work. It too has 128MB RAM. I think though it's got something to do with
the mobo that's being used. I guess some do and some don't.
--
Mark
*
sense.
>
> Patti
> Registered Linux User #184611
>
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Original Message
> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
>
> On 9/10/00, 6:04:21 AM, Dennis Myers
> &l
Yikes. I have the Power Pack. I should checked my CDs...
Now which one is it? I should installed it first rather then downloading
it..
Maybe that will resolve the mime errors?
Thanks,
Roman
Chmouel Boudjnah wrote:
>
> Romanator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Back again,
> >
> > I think th
On Sat, 27 May 2000, Romanator wrote:
>Back again,
>
>I think the file extensions for a Real Player plugin is .ram.
>
>Any ideas?
You can download a free version of RealPlayer 7.0 for Linux at
www.real.com
Paul
)0(---)0(
Finally I know how many stars there are:
Romanator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Back again,
>
> I think the file extensions for a Real Player plugin is .ram.
RealPlayer is shipped with the PowerPack
http://www.linux-mandrake.com/en/fpowerpack.php3>.
--
MandrakeSoft Inchttp://www.mandrakesoft.com
In travel.
Back again,
I think the file extensions for a Real Player plugin is .ram.
Any ideas?
Roman
Type 'dmesg' and hit or 'dmesg | more'.
See "Memory: ..." section at fist rows.
Tran
Michael wrote:
> How do i check how much of my 128 megs are seen by mandrake?
> -michael-
Michael wrote:
>
> How do i check how much of my 128 megs are seen by mandrake?
> -michael-
Type..freeat the prompt.
Gene
Michael wrote:
>
> How do i check how much of my 128 megs are seen by mandrake?
> -michael-
>From the command line, type
free
and then inspect column one.
Try top for a continually updating display of how much
memory is being used by all of your processes.
John
How do i check how much of my 128 megs are seen by mandrake?
-michael-
RTFM
- Original Message -
From: Michael Scottaline <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, March 11, 2000 4:55 AM
Subject: Re: [[newbie] Ram Problems]
> "Charles Ulwelling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I am having trouble wit
iginal Message -
From: Michael Scottaline <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, March 11, 2000 6:55 AM
Subject: Re: [[newbie] Ram Problems]
>
I hear it could get ugly if you remove RAM so keep boot disk with out
> this set.
>
> "Knowledge is Power"
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> - Original Message -
> From: Charles Ulwelling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Friday,
Pendragon,
I have similar problems. As yet, I do not have an answer. HOwever, Linux does seem
to report an unusally high amount of memory for my system in
other areas. I am just wondering if it uses the >64 area for something else.
Wayne
t
this set.
"Knowledge is Power"
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: Charles Ulwelling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, March 10, 2000 8:12 PM
Subject: [newbie] Ram Problems
> I am having trouble with Linux Mandrake 7 recognizing
I am having trouble with Linux Mandrake 7 recognizing all my ram. I have
256megs in my system and Mandrake only recognizes 64 megs of that when I
boot. I have an Abit BE6 motherboard. Does anyone have any ideas?
Thanks
Pendragon
Do it like this
append="mem=128M hdc=ide-scsi"
Good Luck
- Original Message -
From: Carrefour Esotérique - L'Annuaire de l'Esotérisme
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 29, 2000 5:12 PM
Subject: Re: [newbie] Ram dectect
Sender: "Carrefour
> I tried to put the line append="mem=128M" into my lilo.conf but i've
yet an
> append="hdc=ide-scsi". And 2 appends in the same stanza generate an
> error message.
> > How can I solve that ?
I saw somewhere that you can put more than one item in the single
append, but I d
1 - 100 of 159 matches
Mail list logo
