On Friday 09 January 2004 15:39, Richard Urwin wrote:
> On Friday 09 Jan 2004 2:00 pm, Kaj Haulrich wrote:
> > And
> > you cannot find a single, commercial bank in my country that
> > doesn't run OS/2. Or a teller machine, for that matter.
>
> But with OS/2 being end-of-lifed lots of teller machine
On Friday 09 Jan 2004 2:00 pm, Kaj Haulrich wrote:
> And
> you cannot find a single, commercial bank in my country that
> doesn't run OS/2. Or a teller machine, for that matter.
But with OS/2 being end-of-lifed lots of teller machines are switching to XP.
A USA supplier recently had problems with
On Fri, 9 Jan 2004 02:29:46 + (UTC)
Jonesy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > This can mean only one thing: more developers working on Linux desktop
> > sol'ns,
> > more support for open standards in desktop applications, more for all of us
> > who
> > want to see the end of the MS monopoly on the
On Thu, 8 Jan 2004 08:31:53 -0500, JoeHill hath writ:
>
> Okay, I know most of you read *Slashdot*, but just in case anyone missed this
> one, this is very exciting. A leaked memo from IBM indicates the company is
> committed to moving it's productivity desktops/apps to Linux and/or OS
> alternati
