Karl Ove Hufthammer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Greg) wrote in
>news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>
>>> ktouch is indeed "flashier" than typist/gtypist --
>>> http://www.poogle.co.uk
>
>I'm a bit late in this thread, and didn't catch the original
>messages. Did anyone mention Tux Typing
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Greg) wrote in
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>> ktouch is indeed "flashier" than typist/gtypist --
>> http://www.poogle.co.uk
I'm a bit late in this thread, and didn't catch the original
messages. Did anyone mention Tux Typing 2? It's available as a
testing RPM ('tuxtype2'), and is
