SNIP
>
> Mark, what's the problem with shorewall ? - I'm running it
> and don't like to be nervous. When I was on 8.x I had
> Bastille, but I suppose Mandrake has good reasons to
> replace it with Shorewall. Your opinion, please ?
>
SNIP
I didn't like shorewall because i couldn't get to work w
On Friday 10 January 2003 05:54 pm, Mark Weaver wrote:
> Milos Prudek wrote:
> > Kesav Tadimeti wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >> Someone (Sir Robin I believe) said that V8.1 was bad and 8.2 was
> >> Mandrake's
> >> best release yet. Mandrake Linux 9.0 didn't receive a favorable review
> >> from
> >> OS news .c
On Friday 10 Jan 2003 11:54 pm, Mark Weaver wrote:
> Milos Prudek wrote:
> > Kesav Tadimeti wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >> Someone (Sir Robin I believe) said that V8.1 was bad and 8.2 was
> >> Mandrake's
> >> best release yet. Mandrake Linux 9.0 didn't receive a favorable review
> >> from
> >> OS news .com.
On Friday 10 January 2003 11:54 pm, Mark Weaver wrote:
>
> personally am holding out for 9.2 to become official
> before even going near any of my servers with the CD.
> 9.0 is a gorgeous and stable workstation, but has a few
> too many challenges where servers are concerned. I'm
> really hoping th
Anne Wilson wrote:
On Wednesday 08 Jan 2003 11:08 am, Walt Frampus wrote:
On Wed, 2003-01-08 at 02:18, Kesav Tadimeti wrote:
Hi,
Someone (Sir Robin I believe) said that V8.1 was bad and 8.2 was
Mandrake's best release yet. Mandrake Linux 9.0 didn't receive a
favorable review from OS news .com.
On Wednesday 08 Jan 2003 11:08 am, Walt Frampus wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-01-08 at 02:18, Kesav Tadimeti wrote:
> > Hi,
> > Someone (Sir Robin I believe) said that V8.1 was bad and 8.2 was
> > Mandrake's best release yet. Mandrake Linux 9.0 didn't receive a
> > favorable review from OS news .com. Is it
On Wed, 2003-01-08 at 02:18, Kesav Tadimeti wrote:
> Hi,
> Someone (Sir Robin I believe) said that V8.1 was bad and 8.2 was Mandrake's
> best release yet. Mandrake Linux 9.0 didn't receive a favorable review from
> OS news .com. Is it better to wait for 9.1 or go ahead for 9.0? And how do I
> upgra
On Wednesday 08 Jan 2003 9:39 am, Milos Prudek wrote:
> Kesav Tadimeti wrote:
> > Hi,
> > Someone (Sir Robin I believe) said that V8.1 was bad and 8.2 was
> > Mandrake's best release yet. Mandrake Linux 9.0 didn't receive a
> > favorable review from OS news .com. Is it better to wait for 9.1 or go
Kesav Tadimeti wrote:
Hi,
Someone (Sir Robin I believe) said that V8.1 was bad and 8.2 was Mandrake's
best release yet. Mandrake Linux 9.0 didn't receive a favorable review from
OS news .com. Is it better to wait for 9.1 or go ahead for 9.0? And how do I
I am a former Red Hat user. I used Red
On Wed, 2003-01-08 at 18:18, Kesav Tadimeti wrote:
> Hi,
> Someone (Sir Robin I believe) said that V8.1 was bad and 8.2 was Mandrake's
> best release yet. Mandrake Linux 9.0 didn't receive a favorable review from
> OS news .com. Is it better to wait for 9.1 or go ahead for 9.0? And how do I
> upgra
10 matches
Mail list logo