On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 16:56:40 -0500
Kenneth Rhodes disseminated the following:
> For some reason I always like prefer to log into the console/comand line.
Ditto here. It just makes it so much freakin' easier to configure the way X
behaves at startup, as we've discovered here today :-)
--
JoeHill
On Thu, 2005-01-20 at 16:30 -0500, JoeHill wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 15:53:12 -0500
> Kenneth Rhodes disseminated the following:
>
> > > ...and seeing if that makes it work properly...
> > >
> > Thanks, that worked like a charm - for the current session.
> > I converted that command line to an
On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 15:53:12 -0500
Kenneth Rhodes disseminated the following:
> > ...and seeing if that makes it work properly...
> >
> Thanks, that worked like a charm - for the current session.
> I converted that command line to an executable shell script
> as a stop gap measure while I search
Op Thu, 20 Jan 2005 15:53:12 -0500 schreef Kenneth Rhodes:
>as a stop gap measure while I search for the best way
>to incorporate that into the "startxfce4" script which
>I can't seem to find for some reason.
type: "which startxfce4" (without the quotes)
It might be helpful to you.
Paul
--
V
I suppose it would be best to get involved
with an XFCE specific list or forum about
stuff like this... but I thought I'd mention
it here in case anyone has any comments or
suggestions.
While trying to install an a "KMess" icon
for a panel the panel crashed when I clicked
on one of the folders in
On Fri, 2005-01-21 at 06:04 +1100, Stephen Kühn wrote:
> > Since installing the XFCE 4.2 official release the mouse wheel now
> > pages through the browser history - that is in XFCE. In GNOME the
> > mouse wheel functions just as before - scrolling up and down the
> > web page.
> >
> > Does anyon
On Thu, 2005-01-20 at 15:00, Kenneth Rhodes wrote:
> I just installed XFCE 4.2 from Charles Edwars RPMS - thanks Charles!
>
> I am absolutely thrilled, yet I do have one problem. Under Gnome while
> browsing web a web page in Firefox and Epiphany too, I do believe, I'd
> scroll down or up the web
I just installed XFCE 4.2 from Charles Edwars RPMS - thanks Charles!
I am absolutely thrilled, yet I do have one problem. Under Gnome while
browsing web a web page in Firefox and Epiphany too, I do believe, I'd
scroll down or up the web page with the mouse wheel. Under the the
last couple of XFCE
Now available for Mdk 10.1
libxfce4mcs2-4.2.0-0.1010.1mdk.i586.rpm
libxfce4mcs2-devel-4.2.0-0.1010.1mdk.i586.rpm
libxfce4util1-4.2.0-0.1010.1mdk.i586.rpm
libxfce4util1-devel-4.2.0-0.1010.1mdk.i586.rpm
libxfcegui4_3-4.2.0-0.1010.1mdk.i586.rpm
libxfcegui4_3-devel-4.2.0-0.1010.1mdk.i586.rpm
libxfceg
>> For as much as I love Charles Edwards RPM archive, I still have
>> preferred to use the graphical installers for XFCE that are available
>> here: http://www.os-cillation.com/article.php?sid=42
> I always found compiling against GTK on Mandrake is a pain in the ass,
> it feels like I have alway
On Sun, 19 Dec 2004 08:18:03 +1100
Stephen Kühn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> For as much as I love Charles Edwards RPM archive, I still have
> preferred to use the graphical installers for XFCE that are available
> here: http://www.os-cillation.com/article.php?sid=42
>
> They are just bloody bril
On Sun, 2004-12-19 at 08:03, Vegard Lundby Rekaa wrote:
> The link on http://www.eslrahc.com/10.0/ to download xfce
>
> xfce-4.1.91-0.1000.2cae.i586.rpm
>
> seems to be dead. So my question is:
> Where can I find a xfce install file I can use to add XFCE to my mdk 10.0
> system?
> In charles rpm
On Sat, 18 Dec 2004 22:03:53 +0100 (CET)
"Vegard Lundby Rekaa" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The link on http://www.eslrahc.com/10.0/ to download xfce
>
> xfce-4.1.91-0.1000.2cae.i586.rpm
>
> seems to be dead. So my question is:
> Where can I find a xfce install file I can use to add XFCE to my m
The link on http://www.eslrahc.com/10.0/ to download xfce
xfce-4.1.91-0.1000.2cae.i586.rpm
seems to be dead. So my question is:
Where can I find a xfce install file I can use to add XFCE to my mdk 10.0
system?
In charles rpm page there are several rpm- packages. Do I need all these,
or wich is r
On Wed, 15 Dec 2004 12:17:43 +
Margot wrote:
> That's strange - I have the taskbar installed & running on xfce on
10.1!
>
> xfce-taskbar-plugin-0.2.2-0.1010.1mdk shows as installed on the
> software section of MCC, and I assumed it came from eslrahc. Each
> time I've updated xfce, I've had
Kenneth Rhodes wrote:
Hi,
I noticed that the taskbar plugin was missing from the recent
announcement posted by Charles.
Also, it appears that the taskbar link is broken from the
page:
http://www.eslrahc.com/10.1/xfce-taskbar-plugin-0.2.2-0.1010.1mdk.i586.rpm
Its kinda strange running XFCE without
On Thursday 25 November 2004 08:06, Charles A Edwards wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Nov 2004 08:00:50 +0100
>
> Anders Lind wrote:
> > you are correct there I suppose...the buildorder for the rpm's are the
> > same as the buildorder for 4.0.6?
>
> If you are installing via rpm the build order has nothing to
Use
urpmi --auto-select
or
urpmi xfce
All xfce rpms you currently have will be properly upgraded.
You are using sylpheed-claws.
I assume this is because you prefer it and are satisfied with the rpms
Mdk provides
do
rpm -q --changelog sylpheed-claws |head
What name do you see.
Use my rpms
> Anders,
>
> Trust Charles, trust me! I used his Xfce on 10, and I'm now using
> his latest version on 10.1, and it's beautiful!
>
> Just go to his site www.eslrahc.com, follow the instructions he
> gives to set it as an urpmi source for whichever Mandrake you're
> running, then use urpmi to insta
On Thu, 25 Nov 2004 08:42:28 +0100
Anders Lind wrote:
> So the different modules doesn't depend on each other?
Use
urpmi --auto-select
or
urpmi xfce
All xfce rpms you currently have will be properly upgraded.
You are using sylpheed-claws.
I assume this is because you prefer it and are satisfied
Anders Lind wrote:
If you are installing via rpm the build order has nothing to do with it.
If you are speaking of the Order in which I build the rpms, I have done
it so many times I could do it in my sleep.
If you are running 4.0.6, whether you are using rpms from my site or
those from a Mdk mirro
If you are installing via rpm the build order has nothing to do with it.
If you are speaking of the Order in which I build the rpms, I have done
it so many times I could do it in my sleep.
If you are running 4.0.6, whether you are using rpms from my site or
those from a Mdk mirror you are still U
On Thu, 25 Nov 2004 08:00:50 +0100
Anders Lind wrote:
> you are correct there I suppose...the buildorder for the rpm's are the
> same as the buildorder for 4.0.6?
If you are installing via rpm the build order has nothing to do with it.
If you are speaking of the Order in which I build the rpms,
On Thu, 25 Nov 2004 01:34:51 -0500
Charles A Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Seriously", if you are running either Mdk 10.0 or 10.1 dl the rpms from
> my site and you need not worry about the fucking installer.
>
> Stephen, I have to pay for both my site and its bandwidth usage.
> Unless I
On Thu, 25 Nov 2004 07:07:23 +0100
Anders Lind wrote:
> Seriously, I have downloaded the installers from this page
"Seriously", if you are running either Mdk 10.0 or 10.1 dl the rpms from
my site and you need not worry about the fucking installer.
Stephen, I have to pay for both my site and its
On Thu, 25 Nov 2004 09:10:18 +1100
Stephen Kühn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Mate - seriously - get the graphical installers - they're heaps easier
> to deal with...and you might want to double check what GTK-2 libs and
> whatnot ARE or ARE NOT installed on yer box...
Seriously, I have downloaded
On Thu, 2004-11-25 at 09:14, Anders Lind wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Nov 2004 08:47:40 +1100
> Stephen Kühn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Anders - on the download page for XFce4.2rc1, you will see a link for
> > the "Graphical Installers" - you need to get those. Install the GTK one
> > first, then whe
On Thu, 25 Nov 2004 08:47:40 +1100
Stephen Kühn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Anders - on the download page for XFce4.2rc1, you will see a link for
> the "Graphical Installers" - you need to get those. Install the GTK one
> first, then when that is completed, install the XFce installer, then the
>
On Thu, 2004-11-25 at 08:38, Anders Lind wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Nov 2004 07:51:12 +1100
> Stephen Kühn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Strange that.
> > I'm running 4.2 on 10.0
>
> Or are those called 4.1.99? I tried to download the tar-balls but it
> complains that it can't find the GTK+-librarie
On Wed, 24 Nov 2004 21:53:55 +0100
Anders Lind wrote:
> I am hitting the wall with 10.0 as well...hmm...are there any rpm's of
> 4.2 out there...I couldn't find any on Charles Edwards site.but I
> might be blind LOL
They are there.
xfce-4.1.99.1 (Xfce-4.2 RC 1)
I did only the base pkgs for
On Thu, 25 Nov 2004 07:51:12 +1100
Stephen Kühn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Strange that.
> I'm running 4.2 on 10.0
Or are those called 4.1.99? I tried to download the tar-balls but it complains
that it can't find the GTK+-libraries
/Anders
On Thu, 2004-11-25 at 07:53, Anders Lind wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Nov 2004 08:31:20 +1100
> Stephen Kühn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Anders,
> > I think you're going to hit the wall with the GTK-2 libraries mate.
> > Might as well finish your download of 10 and THEN get the installer (for
> > GTK-
On Wed, 24 Nov 2004 08:31:20 +1100
Stephen Kühn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Anders,
> I think you're going to hit the wall with the GTK-2 libraries mate.
> Might as well finish your download of 10 and THEN get the installer (for
> GTK-2, XFce and the XFce toys).
>
I am hitting the wall with 10.0
On Wed, 2004-11-24 at 05:59, Anders Lind wrote:
> Hello friends,
>
> is it possible to run Xfce 4.2 on Mdk 9.1. I had to make an emergencyinstall
> here and ended up with 9.1, gonna use the night to download 10.x though
>
> Cheers
> Anders
Anders,
I think you're going to hit the wall with the G
Hello friends,
is it possible to run Xfce 4.2 on Mdk 9.1. I had to make an emergencyinstall
here and ended up with 9.1, gonna use the night to download 10.x though
Cheers
Anders
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
Go to http
I have just updated my xfce rpms for Mdk 10.1 to 4.2 RC 1
libxfce4mcs2-4.1.99.1-0.1010.1cae.i586.rpm
libxfce4mcs2-devel-4.1.99.1-0.1010.1cae.i586.rpm
libxfce4util1-4.1.99.1-0.1010.1cae.i586.rpm
libxfce4util1-devel-4.1.99.1-0.1010.1cae.i586.rpm
libxfce4util-kiosk-4.1.99.1-0.1010.1cae.i586.rpm
libx
Xfce-4.0.6 rpms for Mdk 10.0 are now available from my site.
Charles
--
Fortune's real live weird band names #655:
Spaceman Bill and the Groovy Gravy
--
Mandrake Linux 10.0 on BigBoy #184142
Registered Linux user #182463 *http://www.eslrahc.com*
2.6.5-1.tmb.6mdkenterp
Xfce-4.0.5 rpms for Mdk 9.2 and Mdk 10.0 are now available from my site
Charles
--
How can you work when the system's so crowded?
--
Mandrake Linux 10.0 on BigBoy #184142
Registered Linux user #182463 *http://www.eslrahc.com*
2.6.4-1.tmb.5mdkenterprise
-
Unless the unforeseen occurs I anticipate having the xfce-4.0.4 rpms
available for both 9.2 and 10.0 by this weekend.
Charles
--
Insanity is considered a ground for divorce, though by the very same
token it is the shortest detour to marriage.
-- Wilson Mizner
--
On Sat, 27 Dec 2003 23:40:31 -0500
> > Charles A Edwards wrote:
>
> > The version of mozilla that is required is dependent upon the
> > version of mozilla installed on the system when galeon is built.
> >
> > Mozilla-1.5 is also avaiable from my site.
> > There had been reports of problems with it
Charles A Edwards wrote:
On Fri, 26 Dec 2003 23:06:58 -0500
Guy Rouillier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Charles, sorry to send one note after the other. I downloaded your
galeon package, and I'm trying to install it. When I do, it complains
"galeon-1.3.10-3.4mdk.i586 (due to unsatisied mozilla[*][
On Fri, 26 Dec 2003 23:06:58 -0500
Guy Rouillier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Charles, sorry to send one note after the other. I downloaded your
> galeon package, and I'm trying to install it. When I do, it complains
> "galeon-1.3.10-3.4mdk.i586 (due to unsatisied mozilla[*][== 1.5]". I
> int
Charles A Edwards wrote:
Mandrake 9.2 rpm for xfce-4.0.2 are now available from my site.
4.0.2 is a bug-fix release.
Changes:
* Improve window manager responsiveness
* Various bug fixes in file manager, window manager and panel
* More 64bit clean up
* New translations added:
Azerbaijani
I have n
Charles A Edwards wrote:
Mandrake 9.2 rpm for xfce-4.0.2 are now available from my site.
4.0.2 is a bug-fix release.
Changes:
* Improve window manager responsiveness
* Various bug fixes in file manager, window manager and panel
* More 64bit clean up
* New translations added:
Azerbaijani
I have n
On Tue, 23 Dec 2003 23:11:20 -0500 (EST)
Ramin M <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks for the reply. I assume this means that KDE automaticly adds
> an option for XFCE 4 beside XFCE 3. However my question has been more
> general. For example, i would like to upgrade to Gimp 1.3 and again
> the ma
Thanks for the reply. I assume this means that KDE automaticly adds
an option for XFCE 4 beside XFCE 3. However my question has been more
general. For example, i would like to upgrade to Gimp 1.3 and again the
mandrake installer does not recognize that i already have Gimp 1.2.5.
So does it mean t
On Tue, 23 Dec 2003 20:10:10 -0500 (EST)
Ramin M <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is a general question also relevant to the particular case of
> XFCE4.0.2: If i choose to install xfce through mandrake installtion,
> does it automaticly remove the older version. I am asking this because
> when
This is a general question also relevant to the particular case of
XFCE4.0.2: If i choose to install xfce through mandrake installtion,
does it automaticly remove the older version. I am asking this because
when i high light this option as the current install version it says
none. So it seems it
On Thursday 02 October 2003 10:46, Todd Slater wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 07:26:01PM -0400, Greg Meyer wrote:
> > On Sunday 28 September 2003 11:41 pm, Todd Slater wrote:
> > > I finally got around to making the RPM's for XFce 4.0, available at
> > > http://clevername.homeip.net/xfce4/ as alw
On Thu, 2003-10-02 at 23:46, Todd Slater wrote:
> The former. Still struggling with the latter.
...but at your highly advanced age, ladders are a struggle anyways,
ain't that correct? (g)
stephen kuhn - owner
==
illawarra computer services
a kuhn media australia compa
On Sunday 28 September 2003 11:41 pm, Todd Slater wrote:
> I finally got around to making the RPM's for XFce 4.0, available at
> http://clevername.homeip.net/xfce4/ as always.
>
Cool. Are these checkinstall rpms or are they built from spec file?
--
/g
"Outside of a dog, a man's best friend is a
On Tue, 30 Sep 2003 19:09:10 -0500
John Drouhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> uttered:
> I have succeeded in running xfce4 with pek. It it's pretty awesome! I
> just have some questions:
>
> 1. How can I get new themes? The default purple one isn't to my
> liking.
Not too many themes available yet for t
On Tue, 30 Sep 2003 08:13:15 -0400
HaywireMac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Sep 2003 21:27:47 -0500
> John Drouhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> uttered:
>
> > What is your startup script for running pekwm, xfce4-iconbox,
> > xfce4-taskbar, and gkrellm?
>
> #XFCE4 and Pekwm
> xfce-mcs-manager
Todd Slater wrote:
On Tue, Sep 30, 2003 at 12:03:47PM -0400, Mark Weaver wrote:
Stephen Kuhn wrote:
The only thing I have to whinge about (whinge = whine) is that when I
try to "run" or use another "right-click" function - it takes SO
long...so I re-arranged my path statements and that helped a b
On Tue, Sep 30, 2003 at 11:40:39PM +1000, Stephen Kuhn wrote:
>
> The only thing I have to whinge about (whinge = whine) is that when I
> try to "run" or use another "right-click" function - it takes SO
> long...so I re-arranged my path statements and that helped a bit...but
> wonderingdoes an
On Tue, Sep 30, 2003 at 12:03:47PM -0400, Mark Weaver wrote:
> Stephen Kuhn wrote:
> >The only thing I have to whinge about (whinge = whine) is that when I
> >try to "run" or use another "right-click" function - it takes SO
> >long...so I re-arranged my path statements and that helped a bit...but
>
Stephen Kuhn wrote:
On Tue, 2003-09-30 at 06:03, Mark Weaver wrote:
Stephen Kuhn wrote:
On Mon, 2003-09-29 at 13:41, Todd Slater wrote:
I finally got around to making the RPM's for XFce 4.0, available at
http://clevername.homeip.net/xfce4/ as always.
WHAT A GUY! Gee, mate, you're a sport! Goo
On Tue, 30 Sep 2003 08:05:41 -0700
Eric Huff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> uttered:
> XFce and Pekwm, huh?
>
> Man, now i have to go and try stuff again.
>
> How's the latest CVS doing? Am i gonna have to change my config
> files? (I have sorta paid attention, but now very well..)
Mainly just the
XFce and Pekwm, huh?
Man, now i have to go and try stuff again.
How's the latest CVS doing? Am i gonna have to change my config
files? (I have sorta paid attention, but now very well..)
--
Mandrake HowTo's & More: http://twiki.mdklinuxfaq.org
Want to buy your Pack or Services f
On Tue, 2003-09-30 at 08:40, HaywireMac wrote:
> Pekwm, it's a really cool WM, I'm running the latest CVS, they just
> added the necessary Freedesktop.org compatibilities so I can run Pekwm
> instead of XFWM. So I run the XFCE panel and mcs-daemon and stuff, but
> Pekwm takes care of the windows.
On Tue, 2003-09-30 at 06:35, Kevin B. O'Brien wrote:
> Another newbie question here. What is XFce 4.0 anyway?
Unlike any form of M$ Windows, you have a choice of the program that
manages your windows - hence Window Managers and Desktops. In the lead
are currently KDE and Gnome - but being that th
On Tue, 2003-09-30 at 06:29, Boulytchev, Vasiliy wrote:
> Ladies and Gents,
> Does anyone know/use a Groupware Linux Email client that replaces Outlook?
>
> THANKS!
>
> Vasiliy Boulytchev
Yeah - Evoltuion...1.4.5...what else?
stephen kuhn - owner
==
illawarra
On Tue, 2003-09-30 at 06:03, Mark Weaver wrote:
> Stephen Kuhn wrote:
> > On Mon, 2003-09-29 at 13:41, Todd Slater wrote:
> >
> >>I finally got around to making the RPM's for XFce 4.0, available at
> >>http://clevername.homeip.net/xfce4/ as always.
> >
> >
> > WHAT A GUY! Gee, mate, you're a spo
On Tue, 30 Sep 2003 08:52:56 +0100
Derek Jennings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> uttered:
> I have some files in the download area of my web site which will
> create 'Mandrake Menus' for pekwm.
> http://www.jennings.homelinux.net/modules.php?name=Downloads&d_op=viewdownload&cid=1
>
> I am running the releas
On Mon, 29 Sep 2003 21:27:47 -0500
John Drouhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> uttered:
> What is your startup script for running pekwm, xfce4-iconbox,
> xfce4-taskbar, and gkrellm?
#XFCE4 and Pekwm
xfce-mcs-manager
#xfwm4 --daemon
xfce4-iconbar &
#xfdesktop &
xset b off
xset m 50/10 3 &
gkrellm -w &
xscr
On Tuesday 30 Sep 2003 3:27 am, John Drouhard wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Sep 2003 18:40:45 -0400
>
> HaywireMac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Mon, 29 Sep 2003 16:37:43 -0400
> >
> > Mark Weaver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> uttered:
> > > Nice Joe! how'd ya do that? And what is Pek?
> >
> > Pekwm, it's a really
On Mon, 29 Sep 2003 18:40:45 -0400
HaywireMac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Sep 2003 16:37:43 -0400
> Mark Weaver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> uttered:
>
> >
> > Nice Joe! how'd ya do that? And what is Pek?
>
> Pekwm, it's a really cool WM, I'm running the latest CVS, they just
> added the ne
On Mon, 29 Sep 2003 16:37:43 -0400
Mark Weaver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> uttered:
>
> Nice Joe! how'd ya do that? And what is Pek?
Pekwm, it's a really cool WM, I'm running the latest CVS, they just
added the necessary Freedesktop.org compatibilities so I can run Pekwm
instead of XFWM. So I run the X
On Mon, 29 Sep 2003 17:59:08 -0400
Mark Weaver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> insightfully noted:
>> Another newbie question here. What is XFce 4.0 anyway?
>
>a very awesome and very light weight desktop manager.
>
One might say it has moved /beyond/ wm status and is app
Kevin B. O'Brien wrote:
At 04:03 PM 9/29/2003, Mark Weaver said something remarkably like (but
somehow subtly different from):
Stephen Kuhn wrote:
On Mon, 2003-09-29 at 13:41, Todd Slater wrote:
I finally got around to making the RPM's for XFce 4.0, available at
http://clevername.homeip.net/xfc
Mark Wrote:
"If necessity is the mother of invention, then who's the father?"
Its Laziness. Laziness is the FATHER of Invention.
Now ya know. (no dna tests required)
Harv / AI9NL
washburn, WIsconsin
Mark Weaver wrote:
Stephen Kuhn wrote:
On Mon, 2003-09-29 at 13:41, Todd Slater wrote:
Boulytchev, Vasiliy wrote:
Ladies and Gents,
Does anyone know/use a Groupware Linux Email client that replaces Outlook?
THANKS!
Vasiliy Boulytchev
Colorado Information Technologies, Inc.
http://www.coinfotech.com
Evolution comes to mind. As far as "real" GRoupWare apps take a look at
wha
HaywireMac wrote:
On Mon, 29 Sep 2003 16:03:17 -0400
Mark Weaver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> uttered:
here here...I'm with Stephen on this. I LOVE IT! Man! has this desktop
ever come a long way. Thank you SO much for putting this stuff online.
It is Beauutiful and so stinkin
On Mon, 2003-09-29 at 23:29, Boulytchev, Vasiliy wrote:
> Ladies and Gents,
> Does anyone know/use a Groupware Linux Email client that replaces Outlook?
>
> THANKS!
is Evolution any use to you?
Paul M
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.co
At 04:03 PM 9/29/2003, Mark Weaver said something remarkably like (but
somehow subtly different from):
Stephen Kuhn wrote:
On Mon, 2003-09-29 at 13:41, Todd Slater wrote:
I finally got around to making the RPM's for XFce 4.0, available at
http://clevername.homeip.net/xfce4/ as always.
WHAT A GUY!
On Mon, 29 Sep 2003 16:03:17 -0400
Mark Weaver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> uttered:
>
> here here...I'm with Stephen on this. I LOVE IT! Man! has this desktop
>
> ever come a long way. Thank you SO much for putting this stuff online.
>
> It is Beauutiful and so stinkin easy
Ladies and Gents,
Does anyone know/use a Groupware Linux Email client that replaces Outlook?
THANKS!
Vasiliy Boulytchev
Colorado Information Technologies, Inc.
http://www.coinfotech.com
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Stephen Kuhn wrote:
On Mon, 2003-09-29 at 13:41, Todd Slater wrote:
I finally got around to making the RPM's for XFce 4.0, available at
http://clevername.homeip.net/xfce4/ as always.
WHAT A GUY! Gee, mate, you're a sport! Good on ya! Hip hip hoorah!
Todd's neater than sliced bread! Kudos! Nudos!
On Mon, 2003-09-29 at 13:41, Todd Slater wrote:
> I finally got around to making the RPM's for XFce 4.0, available at
> http://clevername.homeip.net/xfce4/ as always.
WHAT A GUY! Gee, mate, you're a sport! Good on ya! Hip hip hoorah!
Todd's neater than sliced bread! Kudos! Nudos! Das ist gut! Muy
I finally got around to making the RPM's for XFce 4.0, available at
http://clevername.homeip.net/xfce4/ as always.
t
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
> Ah, FreeBSD ain't good fer nuthin' anyways...might as well chuck it out
> and install OS/2, mate...just send me the installation CD's and I'll
> take care of 'em for ya...
Mouhahahahahahahahaha...I install via FTP, but I can send you the FTP over
email ;P,
besides ports beats RPM everytime ;P
/
On Sun, 2003-09-28 at 15:15, Anders Lind wrote:
> > We're sitting back waiting for Todd Slater-gator to whack together this
> > world-famous Texas style RPM's!
>
> Heh...when downloading the tar-balls and compiling takes so little time? ;o)
> Oh well, to each his ownof course RPM's doesn't wor
> We're sitting back waiting for Todd Slater-gator to whack together this
> world-famous Texas style RPM's!
Heh...when downloading the tar-balls and compiling takes so little time? ;o)
Oh well, to each his ownof course RPM's doesn't work all that good
on FreeBSD ;P
/Anders
Want to buy your
On Sun, 2003-09-28 at 07:10, Miark wrote:
> Anybody venture to guess when a Mandrake-specific RPM will be available
> of this?
>
> Miark
We're sitting back waiting for Todd Slater-gator to whack together this
world-famous Texas style RPM's!
stephen kuhn - owner
==
ill
Anybody venture to guess when a Mandrake-specific RPM will be available
of this?
Miark
On Fri, 26 Sep 2003 10:20:17 +0200, Anders Lind <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> if you have not noticed XFCE 4 is now released in a sharp version.
>
> Cheers
> Anders
>
>
>
Want to buy
Hello everyone,
if you have not noticed XFCE 4 is now released in a sharp version.
Cheers
Anders
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
yep, here i am answering my own post again.
I finally noticed the scrollbar in the setup-->windows tab.
After trying some fonts i did find a bunch that work.
thanks,
huff
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
I just installed xfce off the 9.1 cds. The first time i clicked i saw a
menu with words. Since then, all i see is underlines and periods. (if only
i knew morse code!)
Any idea what the problem could be? It's like the fonts are gone, but i
have no idea where to start. I did an rpm search for fo
Following up on civileme's post. I kept being really impressed w/ how well the 9.1
beta 3 installer looked and worked and was pleased to see that the MCC network setup
had been fixed for those of us w/ out DNS or default gateways, *but* xfce is so
borked in b3 - right mouse-button window-lis
I have solved the problem with Mr Fourdan (The person who made XFce) and I had to add
a .xfce directory in my homedirectory and that did the trick.
/Anders
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Hello friends,
I am having a problem with XFCe, I can't get it to save the changes I make to the
icons. It tells me that it cannot create file. I have no idea what file it means.
It is 3.8.16 of XFce on Mdk 9.0
At work I am running 3.8.14 on Mdk 8.2
Do anyone know what I can do to fix this.
B
SNIP
> Naturally though, your mail has made me curious : If 8.2 runs faster
> than 8.1 maybe I'll try that too because, after all I'm a bit addicted
> to aesthetics, I admit.
>
> And here's my question : will 8.2. break the "natural law" that dictates
> every new version to be slower than the prev
Derek Jennings wrote:
>
>
>
> KDE seems to be OK, and the new kernel makes KDE run significantly faster on
> my laptop than 8.1 did ;-)
>
> derek
>
>
Nice to hear that, Derek. I have an old laptop (IBM Thinkpad 380D with
P150/32 MB RAM) that I use as my "backup & rescue &
old_faithful"-syst
Derek (and Michel Clasquin too),
Sorry to be so long in getting back to you. I've been away from home for
a week.
Your fix did the trick. Thanks!!
The line in /etc/X11/xfce/xinitrc read "xscreensaver -no-splash
-lock-mode &" so I removed the -lock-mode.
BTW, I'm still fooling with RH7.2 and am
On Saturday 23 February 2002 14:49, Derek Jennings wrote:
> I reported this as a bug in 8.2Beta1. Now Beta 3 is out and XFce has
> been taken out altogether!!!
>
> I am a bit worried about this and hope it is not because of the bugs I
> reported in Beta1 :-(
>
> I hope Mandrake do not simply rem
At a guess Terry I would say you are using XFce from Cooker or elsewhere
because the screensaver for XFce on 8.1 worked fine for me, while the 8.2
Beta1 version gave me the same problem you have.
I found the bug. If you edit /etc/X11/xfce/xinitrc and find the line
starting
xscreensaver
edi
On Saturday 23 February 2002 04:49, Terry Smith wrote:
as root, edit the file
/etc/X11/xfce/xinitrc
find the line that launches xscreensaver and remove the --lock-more
parameter (or something like that - it's not on my system anymore so I
can't check exactly).
This parameter is no longer sup
This should be a simple one.
I, along with many others on the list, have settled in on Xfce as my
desktop manager of choice. One neat thing about Xfce is the Xscreensaver
pgm that runs with it (although you can run it with other desktops, wms,
etc.).
>From xfce you configure with xscreensaver-d
As an aside to this, I've found that loading WP8 is blazingly fast in Xfce.
It loads twice as fast on a P233 w/384 megs of ram, running Xfce than it does
on a P733 w/512 megs running KDE! Both machines are running 8.0. This
floored me!
e.
On Thursday 24 January 2002 03:49, you wrote:
>
> O
Another sure-fire way to take one out that isn't responding is to open
KPM and kill the app that way. No worries of bothering anything
important cause if you open KPM as a user the only thing you can kill
are apps that you've started, or that carry your userID.
Mark
Benjamin Sher wrote:
>
> Dea
1 - 100 of 117 matches
Mail list logo
