On Thursday 25 November 2004 08:06, Charles A Edwards wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Nov 2004 08:00:50 +0100
>
> Anders Lind wrote:
> > you are correct there I suppose...the buildorder for the rpm's are the
> > same as the buildorder for 4.0.6?
>
> If you are installing via rpm the build order has nothing to
Use
urpmi --auto-select
or
urpmi xfce
All xfce rpms you currently have will be properly upgraded.
You are using sylpheed-claws.
I assume this is because you prefer it and are satisfied with the rpms
Mdk provides
do
rpm -q --changelog sylpheed-claws |head
What name do you see.
Use my rpms
> Anders,
>
> Trust Charles, trust me! I used his Xfce on 10, and I'm now using
> his latest version on 10.1, and it's beautiful!
>
> Just go to his site www.eslrahc.com, follow the instructions he
> gives to set it as an urpmi source for whichever Mandrake you're
> running, then use urpmi to insta
On Thu, 25 Nov 2004 08:42:28 +0100
Anders Lind wrote:
> So the different modules doesn't depend on each other?
Use
urpmi --auto-select
or
urpmi xfce
All xfce rpms you currently have will be properly upgraded.
You are using sylpheed-claws.
I assume this is because you prefer it and are satisfied
Anders Lind wrote:
If you are installing via rpm the build order has nothing to do with it.
If you are speaking of the Order in which I build the rpms, I have done
it so many times I could do it in my sleep.
If you are running 4.0.6, whether you are using rpms from my site or
those from a Mdk mirro
If you are installing via rpm the build order has nothing to do with it.
If you are speaking of the Order in which I build the rpms, I have done
it so many times I could do it in my sleep.
If you are running 4.0.6, whether you are using rpms from my site or
those from a Mdk mirror you are still U
On Thu, 25 Nov 2004 08:00:50 +0100
Anders Lind wrote:
> you are correct there I suppose...the buildorder for the rpm's are the
> same as the buildorder for 4.0.6?
If you are installing via rpm the build order has nothing to do with it.
If you are speaking of the Order in which I build the rpms,
On Thu, 25 Nov 2004 01:34:51 -0500
Charles A Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Seriously", if you are running either Mdk 10.0 or 10.1 dl the rpms from
> my site and you need not worry about the fucking installer.
>
> Stephen, I have to pay for both my site and its bandwidth usage.
> Unless I
On Thu, 25 Nov 2004 07:07:23 +0100
Anders Lind wrote:
> Seriously, I have downloaded the installers from this page
"Seriously", if you are running either Mdk 10.0 or 10.1 dl the rpms from
my site and you need not worry about the fucking installer.
Stephen, I have to pay for both my site and its
On Thu, 25 Nov 2004 09:10:18 +1100
Stephen Kühn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Mate - seriously - get the graphical installers - they're heaps easier
> to deal with...and you might want to double check what GTK-2 libs and
> whatnot ARE or ARE NOT installed on yer box...
Seriously, I have downloaded
On Thu, 2004-11-25 at 09:14, Anders Lind wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Nov 2004 08:47:40 +1100
> Stephen Kühn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Anders - on the download page for XFce4.2rc1, you will see a link for
> > the "Graphical Installers" - you need to get those. Install the GTK one
> > first, then whe
On Thu, 25 Nov 2004 08:47:40 +1100
Stephen Kühn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Anders - on the download page for XFce4.2rc1, you will see a link for
> the "Graphical Installers" - you need to get those. Install the GTK one
> first, then when that is completed, install the XFce installer, then the
>
On Thu, 2004-11-25 at 08:38, Anders Lind wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Nov 2004 07:51:12 +1100
> Stephen Kühn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Strange that.
> > I'm running 4.2 on 10.0
>
> Or are those called 4.1.99? I tried to download the tar-balls but it
> complains that it can't find the GTK+-librarie
On Wed, 24 Nov 2004 21:53:55 +0100
Anders Lind wrote:
> I am hitting the wall with 10.0 as well...hmm...are there any rpm's of
> 4.2 out there...I couldn't find any on Charles Edwards site.but I
> might be blind LOL
They are there.
xfce-4.1.99.1 (Xfce-4.2 RC 1)
I did only the base pkgs for
On Thu, 25 Nov 2004 07:51:12 +1100
Stephen Kühn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Strange that.
> I'm running 4.2 on 10.0
Or are those called 4.1.99? I tried to download the tar-balls but it complains
that it can't find the GTK+-libraries
/Anders
On Thu, 2004-11-25 at 07:53, Anders Lind wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Nov 2004 08:31:20 +1100
> Stephen Kühn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Anders,
> > I think you're going to hit the wall with the GTK-2 libraries mate.
> > Might as well finish your download of 10 and THEN get the installer (for
> > GTK-
On Wed, 24 Nov 2004 08:31:20 +1100
Stephen Kühn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Anders,
> I think you're going to hit the wall with the GTK-2 libraries mate.
> Might as well finish your download of 10 and THEN get the installer (for
> GTK-2, XFce and the XFce toys).
>
I am hitting the wall with 10.0
On Wed, 2004-11-24 at 05:59, Anders Lind wrote:
> Hello friends,
>
> is it possible to run Xfce 4.2 on Mdk 9.1. I had to make an emergencyinstall
> here and ended up with 9.1, gonna use the night to download 10.x though
>
> Cheers
> Anders
Anders,
I think you're going to hit the wall with the G
Hello friends,
is it possible to run Xfce 4.2 on Mdk 9.1. I had to make an emergencyinstall
here and ended up with 9.1, gonna use the night to download 10.x though
Cheers
Anders
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
Go to http
19 matches
Mail list logo
