Re: [newbie] bind and dhcp

2003-12-05 Thread Fajar Priyanto
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Saturday 06 December 2003 09:39 am, Adolfo Bello wrote: > I noticed that you are using dynamic updates between your dhcp and dns > server. > > Is that working if any client join the network? If so, could you please > post or send me off list your dh

Re: [newbie] bind and dhcp

2003-12-05 Thread Adolfo Bello
On Fri, 2003-12-05 at 22:02, Fajar Priyanto wrote: > Yes Adolfo, it's on a private LAN. > I've googled and found this for dhcpd.conf: > option domain-name-servers 192.168.0.250, 192.168.0.233; > So, now the clients now which secondary dns to consult in case the primary is > out of service. > > No

Re: [newbie] bind and dhcp

2003-12-05 Thread Fajar Priyanto
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thursday 04 December 2003 06:07 pm, Adolfo Bello wrote: > Since you are using a private domain name (systek.kom), there is no way > the clients find out about the secondary name server unless you > explicitly tell them about it. IOW, you should ment

[newbie] bind and dhcp

2003-12-04 Thread Fajar Priyanto
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dear all, I setup a slave name server in the domain. It gets zone transfer from the master. I also use dhcp that dynamically update the zone in the master server. The question is: Should I mention the slave server in clients option in dhcpd.conf? So

Re: [newbie] bind and dhcp

2003-12-04 Thread Adolfo Bello
On Thu, 2003-12-04 at 06:19, Fajar Priyanto wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Dear all, > I setup a slave name server in the domain. It gets zone transfer from the > master. I also use dhcp that dynamically update the zone in the master > server. > > The question is: