gt;
> > - Original Message -
> > From: Clay
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Thursday, March 04, 1999
> > 11:18 AMSubject: Re: [newbie] installing RPM all files are
> > treated like documents?!?
> > no i meant all files are treated
t; To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Thursday, March 04, 1999
> 11:18 AMSubject: Re: [newbie] installing RPM all files are
> treated like documents?!?
> no i meant all files are treated like text files instead of
> executeables
> ...sorry was in hurry when writing
: Thursday, March 04, 1999 11:18 AM
Subject: Re: [newbie] installing RPM all files are treated like
documents?!?
no i meant all files are treated like text files instead of
executeables...sorry was in hurry when writing thisSteve Philp
wrote:> Clay wrote:> >> > when i
no i meant all files are treated like text files instead of executeables
...sorry was in hurry when writing this
Steve Philp wrote:
> Clay wrote:
> >
> > when i install a file from an rpm or tar.gz it seems that all the files
> > in the rpm or tar.gz are treated like text files instead of execut
On Wed, 3 Mar 1999, Clay wrote:
> when i install a file from an rpm or tar.gz it seems that all the files
> in the rpm or tar.gz are treated like text files instead of executables
> like they should be! what gives?! i downloaded these files under windows
> 98 then mounted my fat 32 partition und
Clay wrote:
>
> when i install a file from an rpm or tar.gz it seems that all the files
> in the rpm or tar.gz are treated like text files instead of executables
> like they should be! what gives?! i downloaded these files under windows
> 98 then mounted my fat 32 partition under linux got the fi
when i install a file from an rpm or tar.gz it seems that all the files
in the rpm or tar.gz are treated like text files instead of executables
like they should be! what gives?! i downloaded these files under windows
98 then mounted my fat 32 partition under linux got the files from the
fat 32 par
