On Mon, 2004-10-25 at 08:34, Aron Smith wrote:
> On Sunday 24 October 2004 02:58 pm, Stephen Kühn wrote:
> > On Sun, 2004-10-24 at 23:05, Johan wrote:
> > > > You are not running mgm are you ?
> > >
> > > I have no idea. What is it.? Please
> >
> > mgm = Moaning Goat Monitor
> > A complete wa
On Sunday 24 October 2004 02:58 pm, Stephen Kühn wrote:
> On Sun, 2004-10-24 at 23:05, Johan wrote:
> > > You are not running mgm are you ?
> >
> > I have no idea. What is it.? Please
>
> mgm = Moaning Goat Monitor
> A complete waste of resource - but nice and funky - moreso
> than gKre
On Sun, 2004-10-24 at 23:05, Johan wrote:
> > You are not running mgm are you ?
>
> I have no idea. What is it.? Please
mgm = Moaning Goat Monitor
A complete waste of resource - but nice and funky - moreso
than gKrellm; rather like having a 40ton steel Flamingo
on your front la
On Sun, 24 Oct 2004 21:03:50 +1000
Stephen Kühn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 2004-10-24 at 20:09, Johan wrote:
> > On Sun, 24 Oct 2004 04:14:08 -0500
> > Hoyt Bailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > On Sunday 24 October 2004 03:57, Johan wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > Since updati
On Sun, 24 Oct 2004 05:46:18 -0700
Aron Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sunday 24 October 2004 04:28 am, Hoyt Bailey wrote:
> > On Sunday 24 October 2004 05:09, Johan wrote:
> > > On Sun, 24 Oct 2004 04:14:08 -0500
> > >
> > > Hoyt Bailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > On Sunday 24 Octob
On Sunday 24 October 2004 04:28 am, Hoyt Bailey wrote:
> On Sunday 24 October 2004 05:09, Johan wrote:
> > On Sun, 24 Oct 2004 04:14:08 -0500
> >
> > Hoyt Bailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Sunday 24 October 2004 03:57, Johan wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > Since updating last night now
On Sunday 24 October 2004 05:09, Johan wrote:
> On Sun, 24 Oct 2004 04:14:08 -0500
>
> Hoyt Bailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sunday 24 October 2004 03:57, Johan wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Since updating last night now I find that according to gkrellm
> > > the cpu is fulltime busy.
> > >
On Sun, 2004-10-24 at 20:09, Johan wrote:
> On Sun, 24 Oct 2004 04:14:08 -0500
> Hoyt Bailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Sunday 24 October 2004 03:57, Johan wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Since updating last night now I find that according to gkrellm the
> > > cpu is fulltime busy.
> > >
> >
On Sun, 24 Oct 2004 04:14:08 -0500
Hoyt Bailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sunday 24 October 2004 03:57, Johan wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Since updating last night now I find that according to gkrellm the
> > cpu is fulltime busy.
> >
> > Runningtop show that kdeinit now uses permanently bet
On Sunday 24 October 2004 03:57, Johan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Since updating last night now I find that according to gkrellm the
> cpu is fulltime busy.
>
> Runningtop show that kdeinit now uses permanently between 96 &
> 97 % cpu time.
>
> Kindly please can this be rectified and how/where.
Run to
Hi,
Sorryrunning mdk 10.1 CE.
Since updating last night now I find that according to gkrellm the cpu is fulltime
busy.
Runningtop show that kdeinit now uses permanently between 96 & 97 % cpu time.
Kindly please can this be rectified and how/where.
--
Johan Sch
Registered linux u
Hi,
Since updating last night now I find that according to gkrellm the cpu is fulltime
busy.
Runningtop show that kdeinit now uses permanently between 96 & 97 % cpu time.
Kindly please can this be rectified and how/where.
--
Johan Sch
Registered linux user #333034
May this be a good
12 matches
Mail list logo
