Shane wins. ;)
Femme
shane wrote:
>
> On Sunday 17 March 2002 17:12, Lyvim Xaphir opened a hailing frequency and
> transmitted:
>
> > Don't worry about it. I've felt stupid also; I used to run Windows. ;)
>
> i have felt more stupid. i was certified to run windows. :-P
>
> --
> "To live i
On Sunday 17 March 2002 17:12, Lyvim Xaphir opened a hailing frequency and
transmitted:
> Don't worry about it. I've felt stupid also; I used to run Windows. ;)
i have felt more stupid. i was certified to run windows. :-P
--
"To live is to war with trolls" -Isben
shane
Profile at: http://
On Sun, 2002-03-17 at 03:23, FemmeFatale wrote:
> *smiles* thx. I felt stupid enough as it was though.
>
> I do my best, thats my excuse
>
> Femme
Don't worry about it. I've felt stupid also; I used to run Windows. ;)
L8R,
LX
_
Do
*smiles* thx. I felt stupid enough as it was though.
I do my best, thats my excuse
Femme
Lyvim Xaphir wrote:
>
> On Sat, 2002-03-16 at 17:51, FemmeFatale wrote:
> > OK OK I'm wrong. Shoot me ;p
> >
> > Sorry for the inaccuracy
> >
>
> Femme,
>
> You get an "E" for effort. Don't sweat it, k
On Sat, 2002-03-16 at 17:51, FemmeFatale wrote:
> OK OK I'm wrong. Shoot me ;p
>
> Sorry for the inaccuracy
>
Femme,
You get an "E" for effort. Don't sweat it, keep on helping. :)
LX
_
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com add
OK OK I'm wrong. Shoot me ;p
Sorry for the inaccuracy
Femme
Gerald Waugh wrote:
>
> On Friday 15 March 2002 06:34 pm, FemmeFatale wrote:
> > DDR *dedicated direct ram* IIRC is the acronym. Says it all
> >
> > However, SDRam is poised to take over, and is speccing faster, IIRC.
> >
> > Don't t
If your processor is capable of utilizing the DDR Ed it won't really matter
how much SDRAM you stuff in the slots. It isn't a question of the amount of
memory in place so much as a question of how it operates. The processor
(Athlons, Durons) is able to access the data faster from DDR because da
Tom's article about DDR from February 2000:
http://www6.tomshardware.com/mainboard/00q4/001030/index.html and a small
tidbit for those of us that have trouble with all these blasted acronyms:
http://www.acronymfinder.com.
Duckin' and runnin' away real fast!
Charlie
DDR *dedicated direct ram* IIRC is the acronym. Says it all
However, SDRam is poised to take over, and is speccing faster, IIRC.
Don't take my word for it though. See Tom's Hardware for a better idea.
Femme
ed tharp wrote:
>
> I am building a box and the MOBO allows either ddr, or sdram. so
No question but that DDR is the better solution for any 'performance box.'
Think it through; DDR = Dual Data Rate. SDRAM is slower.
If you'd like to "prove it" to yourself follow the links under the CPU
heading at: http://www.anandtech.com or http://www.tomshardware.com or
http://www.hardocp.
I am building a box and the MOBO allows either ddr, or sdram. so in y'alls
experiance, wheich would be faster, 256mg ddr, or 320 sdram
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
11 matches
Mail list logo