On Friday 26 December 2003 08:39 am, Dick Gevers wrote:
-> On Mon, 1 Dec 2003 23:42:52 -0500, "Ronald J. Hall"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -> wrote about [newbie] Named question...:
->
-> >When I shutdown under v9.2, I get a "failed" message when it comes to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 1 Dec 2003 23:42:52 -0500, "Ronald J. Hall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote about [newbie] Named question...:
>When I shutdown under v9.2, I get a "failed" message when it comes to
>"named". It actually gi
When I shutdown under v9.2, I get a "failed" message when it comes to "named".
It actually gives 3 "failed" messages at different times. The shutdown
continues okay, but I've not had these messages under any other version.
Thanks!
--
Gerald,
At 10:53 AM 1/4/02 -0500, you wrote:
> > There's no point in a local machine going up to my ISP's nameserver to
>find
> > name/address mappings for another machine on my computer is there? DNS for
> > the local LAN has to be handled by a NS that has authority for my LAN. Who
> > else coul
Michael,
At 09:38 AM 1/4/02 -0600, you wrote:
> >Who fulfills DNS requests for local machines if not anoka? I've been told
> >that bind doesn't look at /etc/hosts, which brought my world crashing down.
> >Now what? :-)
> >
> >Thanks for your patience with me, I'm sure we're nearly at the bottom of
> There's no point in a local machine going up to my ISP's nameserver to
find
> name/address mappings for another machine on my computer is there? DNS for
> the local LAN has to be handled by a NS that has authority for my LAN. Who
> else could that be than my local Linux server running DNS?
Yes
>Who fulfills DNS requests for local machines if not anoka? I've been told
>that bind doesn't look at /etc/hosts, which brought my world crashing down.
>Now what? :-)
>
>Thanks for your patience with me, I'm sure we're nearly at the bottom of
this.
>
>julian.
if you are running DNS (named / bin
I have written up the necessary config files for your dns, Julian. They
may need some tweaking, but they should match the setup you describe
below.
The named.conf goes in /etc. The other two files go in /var/named, and
are the actual files which named (dns) uses to keep track on computers
and IP
Gerald,
At 07:40 AM 1/4/02 -0500, you wrote:
> > So what you're saying is that the hosts file is used only by the local
> > machine, right?
>Correct!
> > And is NOT used by bind, right?
>Correct!
Oh dear ...
>Usually the resolv.conf on Linux would have a line
>order hosts bind.
>Which means loo
Ed,
At 11:28 PM 1/3/02 -0500, you wrote:
>On Thursday 03 January 2002 10:51 pm, Julian Opificius wrote:
> > Ed,
> >
> > I understand the /etc/hosts file. But I thought "named" was the guy that
> > shared the info in /etc/hosts with client machines making dns requests. Do
> > i have it wrong? YES
On Thursday 03 January 2002 10:51 pm, Julian Opificius wrote:
> Ed,
>
> I understand the /etc/hosts file. But I thought "named" was the guy that
> shared the info in /etc/hosts with client machines making dns requests. Do
> i have it wrong? YES
Sorry to but in;
if you are not going to use a loca
Ed,
I understand the /etc/hosts file. But I thought "named" was the guy that
shared the info in /etc/hosts with client machines making dns requests. Do
i have it wrong?
Second, what is resolv.conf all about? I noticed with surprise that I have
one with the correct ISP DNS servers already in /
I would expect that for this network, if it was me, to not use named, but set
up a "/etc/hosts" file and an "/etc/resolv.conf" file, setting network search
resoulution for hosts, resolver, dns. that way befor the dns was required,
the computer searches the host file for the IP of the local netw
Hi Ed,
This is what I sent to Ric Tibbets privately. He bravely offered to help.
As I said to to him, I have configured a DNS server before - bind, on NT,
but it was long enough ago that although I undertand the concepts of DNS
well enough, I've forgotten some of the basic terms, and the linux
On Thursday 03 January 2002 05:16 pm, Julian Opificius wrote:
> Is there some willing chap who can help me configure named.conf?
>
#== file named.conf on the master ===
options {
directory "/etc/named"; # where the db files are
allow-transfer { ip.add
On Thu, 2002-01-03 at 16:16, Julian Opificius wrote:
> Is there some willing chap who can help me configure named.conf?
>
> julian.
I could help, although you might be better served just reading the DNS
howto. That's how I learned, anyway...
Dave
--
Do not meddle in the affairs of dragons, for
Is there some willing chap who can help me configure named.conf?
julian.
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Mmm...see also /proc/pci , dmesg got more infomation ^_^
- Original Message -
From: "Franki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, October 27, 2001 4:26 PM
Subject: RE: [newbie] Named and internet connection sharing question
> Thats
Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jon Doe
Sent: Saturday, 27 October 2001 10:04 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [newbie] Named and internet connection sharing question
On Friday 26 October 2001 09:54 pm, you wrote:
> Doing this would prevent named/
On Friday 26 October 2001 09:54 pm, you wrote:
> Doing this would prevent named/DNS from getting responses back on it's
> queries to other servers.
>
> If you want to prevent "inbound" queries you need only avoid defining
> the internet side interface, for named to use.
>
> -JMS
Thanks for your r
|[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Jon Doe
|Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 7:42 PM
|To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Subject: [newbie] Named and internet connection sharing question
|
|
|I have port 53 open for some reason. I want to close it, but I
|can't seem to
|use the built in firewall on mand
I have port 53 open for some reason. I want to close it, but I can't seem to
use the built in firewall on mandrake 8.1 to close it. If I shut off named
the port closes but I no longer can access the internet with my window box.
Is there a way to solve this and have connection sharing and port 53
[Mandrake 8.0]
[bind-9.1.1-1]
I'm trying to get named working as a caching server. my setup is simple -
my linux box (203.14.156.30) is connected to the internet and there's a small
LAN (10.0.2.x) connected to it also.
The "current" error is "the default for the 'auth-nxdomain' option is now
'
count by telephone.
Linux does not have a "Network Connection Wizard". YOU have to supply it
with all the necessary information.
Charles
- Original Message -
From: "aifusionextreme" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, May 12,
HI
I have been trying toget on the inet, and got hold
of some docs to do it and confiure the DNS etc.., but they all seem to assume
that named is a standard service, which I am sure it is, but I dont seem to have
it.
I tried the linuxconf startup and its not there,
also did a search on
Nope, no such directory. It's good until /usr/doc/ then thats it. A
"whereis" shows nothing as well.
Sean
John Aldrich wrote:
>
> On Wed, 26 Jan 2000, you wrote:
> > Thats just it, /usr/sbin/named doesnt exist. And where to find
> > documentation for creating named.conf/named.boot?
> >
> /usr/d
I chose custom/all as well. thats why I am a little surprised. I will
try and get them from CD if not I have your addie'. ;)
Sean
John Aldrich wrote:
>
> On Wed, 26 Jan 2000, you wrote:
> > Thats just it, /usr/sbin/named doesnt exist. And where to find
> > documentation for creating named.conf
On Wed, 26 Jan 2000, you wrote:
> Thats just it, /usr/sbin/named doesnt exist. And where to find
> documentation for creating named.conf/named.boot?
>
/usr/doc/bind-8.2/named-bootconf/Grot/named-bootconf.pl
On Wed, 26 Jan 2000, you wrote:
> Thats just it, /usr/sbin/named doesnt exist. And where to find
> documentation for creating named.conf/named.boot?
>
Hmm...sounds like you'll need to install it off the CDROM
probably. Both named.boot and named.conf were installed by
default here, but then I didn
Thats just it, /usr/sbin/named doesnt exist. And where to find
documentation for creating named.conf/named.boot?
Sean
John Aldrich wrote:
>
> On Tue, 25 Jan 2000, you wrote:
> > How do I start the named daemon? resolv.conf is configured with the
> > nameservers and I don't see named.boot or nam
On Tue, 25 Jan 2000, you wrote:
> How do I start the named daemon? resolv.conf is configured with the
> nameservers and I don't see named.boot or named.conf on my system.
>
Well, you can always CREATE a named.boot and named.conf...
:-) named is started by running /usr/sbin/named on this RH
6.0 bo
31 matches
Mail list logo
