On Fri, 25 Feb 2005 12:09:54 -0700
Ron Hunter-Duvar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Finest list in computerland,
> >
> > I haven't seen an ntfs write question in a year. Has the write
> > issue been resolved? Can I safely share with an ntfs partition
> > now?
> >
> > Lee
>
> Last I heard (a month
On February 24, 2005 23:03, Lee Wiggers wrote:
> Finest list in computerland,
>
> I haven't seen an ntfs write question in a year. Has the write
> issue been resolved? Can I safely share with an ntfs partition now?
>
> Lee
Last I heard (a month or two ago), they had experimental write capability
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday 25 Feb 2005 18:54, Paul wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-02-25 at 06:03, Lee Wiggers wrote:
> > Finest list in computerland,
> >
> > I haven't seen an ntfs write question in a year. Has the write
> > issue been resolved? Can I safely share with an ntf
On Fri, 2005-02-25 at 06:03, Lee Wiggers wrote:
> Finest list in computerland,
>
> I haven't seen an ntfs write question in a year. Has the write
> issue been resolved? Can I safely share with an ntfs partition now?
>
As far as I know, you can still read, but not write.
_
Finest list in computerland,
I haven't seen an ntfs write question in a year. Has the write
issue been resolved? Can I safely share with an ntfs partition now?
Lee
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
Go to http://www.mandra
On Tue, 2004-06-22 at 18:23, Lord Storm wrote:
> > > I think ill be doing the beta run with MDK 10.1 and all candidates I just
> > > hope they anounce it on Distrowatch.
> >
> > Have you tried using Partition Magic to repair the partition table?
> >
> > stephen kuhn - proprietor
>
> No since I don
> > I think ill be doing the beta run with MDK 10.1 and all candidates I just
> > hope they anounce it on Distrowatch.
>
> Have you tried using Partition Magic to repair the partition table?
>
> stephen kuhn - proprietor
No since I dont think they make partition Magic for linux and I only have 1
On Tue, 22 Jun 2004 12:43 am, Lord Storm wrote:
>
>
> > Storm, old china plate, Windows ALWAYS needs to be installed FIRST - no
> > matter what - it's a Microsoft thing - it will rewrite your partition
> > tables no matter what - and if you hose up your Windows installation
> > after mucking aroun
On Tue, 2004-06-22 at 04:43, Carroll Grigsby wrote:
> On Monday 21 June 2004 09:42 am, Stephen Kuhn wrote:
>
> >>> snip
>
>
> > Ok, so ya pinned me to a dead fish on that - but still, UNLESS YOU'RE AN
> > EXPERT, you're going to hose up the installation...and if you're
> > dependent on particula
On Tue, 2004-06-22 at 00:43, Lord Storm wrote:
>
> > Storm, old china plate, Windows ALWAYS needs to be installed FIRST - no
> > matter what - it's a Microsoft thing - it will rewrite your partition
> > tables no matter what - and if you hose up your Windows installation
> > after mucking around w
On Monday 21 June 2004 09:42 am, Stephen Kuhn wrote:
>>> snip
> Ok, so ya pinned me to a dead fish on that - but still, UNLESS YOU'RE AN
> EXPERT, you're going to hose up the installation...and if you're
> dependent on particular partion numberings, installing Windows AFTER
> linux is going to b
> Storm, old china plate, Windows ALWAYS needs to be installed FIRST - no
> matter what - it's a Microsoft thing - it will rewrite your partition
> tables no matter what - and if you hose up your Windows installation
> after mucking around with GNU/linux, well, you're going to have to blast
> it a
On Mon, 2004-06-21 at 22:58, Bryan Phinney wrote:
> On Monday 21 June 2004 08:49 am, Stephen Kuhn wrote:
>
> > For whatever reason, the MS family of OS's refuses to be on anything -
> > or rather, boot from anything except for HDA1 (or the entire HDA for
> > that matter); by common practise, Windo
On Monday 21 June 2004 08:49 am, Stephen Kuhn wrote:
> For whatever reason, the MS family of OS's refuses to be on anything -
> or rather, boot from anything except for HDA1 (or the entire HDA for
> that matter); by common practise, Windows is install first, then
> everything else after that. Can'
On Mon, 2004-06-21 at 21:39, Lord Storm wrote:
> Well I run the bellow system. I had windows 2k pro with NTFS and some how
> mandrake purged Win2k from Partitions and windows would not reinstall.
> Operating system error or something like that it was about 2 weeks ago. Not
> that I realy care no
I was experimenting with Knoppix 3.4 yesterday and found something of
interest - Captive NTFS. I clicked on it to see what it was, and found
something that many people may be looking for. It is a program type
thing that downloads certain ntfs driver files directly from Microsoft,
and uses the code
So, should one choose creating a fat32 partition to have a shared
(between MS Windows and Linux, and with write privileges) hard disk
partition?
Paul
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Jo
On Thu, 2004-03-18 at 14:21, Jerry wrote:
> So with the re-write it looks like maybe I can't do it, right? Or am I on the wrong
> track?
>
> Jerry
Actually, it looks like you're on the right (write) track...
stephen kuhn - owner
==
illawarra computer services
a kuhn
On Thu, 18 Mar 2004 07:26:23 +1100
Stephen Kuhn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'll play around with this today - I can access/change stuff on mine, so
> somethings not right here...
>
> stephen kuhn - owner
I d/l'ed the 2.6.4 kernel tonight and got looking around and saw something I think
an
On Wed, 2004-03-17 at 14:46, Jerry wrote:
> I try :
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] My Documents]# touch test.txt
> touch: cannot touch `test.txt': Read-only file system
>
> I tried also adding rw to options but still got the same result.
>
> /dev/hda1 /mnt/windows ntfs iocharset=iso8859-15,umask=0,rw 0
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 17 March 2004 06:16 am, Stephen Kuhn wrote:
> You should be able to just edit the /etc/fstab and make it read-write;
> here's how mine is (at least the entry for the Wincrap drives)
>
> (snip)
>
> /dev/hda1 /mnt/win_c ntfs iocharset=iso88
On Wed, 17 Mar 2004 10:16:02 +1100
Stephen Kuhn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> You should be able to just edit the /etc/fstab and make it read-write;
> here's how mine is (at least the entry for the Wincrap drives)
>
> (snip)
>
> /dev/hda1 /mnt/win_c ntfs iocharset=iso8859-15,umask=0 0 0
> /de
On Tuesday 16 March 2004 03:11 am, Paranoid wrote:
> I am just installing mandrake 9 on my server. My server have been running
> win 2k server before so all my harddisk is in ntfs and i still want to be
> able to use them in my workstations that stop windows. But what do i do to
> get ntfs support
I am just installing mandrake 9 on my server. My server have been running win 2k
server before so all my harddisk is in ntfs and i still want to be able to use them in
my workstations that stop windows. But what do i do to get ntfs support on my linux
server.
From an Sony Ericsson T68
WG Paran
according to the PR for 10.0 it says:
"Server deployments also benefit from interoperability with MS-Windows® systems thanks
to enhanced support of Windows' Logical Disk Manager and new read/write NTFS support."
( this at http://www.linuxmandrake.com/en/10.0/100PR.php3 )
now.. is it actually p
kup with rsync.
Johan
**
- Original Message -
From: "Greg Meyer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, November 30, 2003 3:39 PM
Subject: Re: [newbie] NTFS and Lilo in MBR
> On Sunday 30 November 2003 06:37 am, Johan wrote:
> &
On Sunday 30 November 2003 06:37 am, Johan wrote:
> If you have done it already then OK.
> Suggest...
> Switch drive 1 with drive 2 and then install mdk on this drivethis will
> leave your XP drive with an intact mbrif you have problems with linux
> booting (or whatever reason) then just un
R.E. Perrett wrote:
I have a hard drive with Windows XP Pro installed using NTFS.
I want to put Mandrake 9.2 on a second hard drive.
If I tell the install program to put the Lilo boot loader on the NTFS
drive in the MBR will it work or will the NTFS cause problems because
Linux can't write to
R.E. Perrett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, November 30, 2003 12:08 PM
Subject: Re: [newbie] NTFS and Lilo in MBR
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi Roger,
>
> On Sunday, November 30, 2003, at 1:59:30 AM PST, you wrote:
>
> > I have a
thanks guys
roger
- Original Message -
From: "Brian Parish" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "newbie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, November 30, 2003 9:09 PM
Subject: Re: [newbie] NTFS and Lilo in MBR
> On Sun, 2003-11-30 at 20:59, R.E. Perrett wrote:
>
On Sun, 2003-11-30 at 20:59, R.E. Perrett wrote:
>
> I have a hard drive with Windows XP Pro installed using NTFS.
> I want to put Mandrake 9.2 on a second hard drive.
> If I tell the install program to put the Lilo boot loader on the NTFS
> drive in the MBR will it work or will the NTFS cause pr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Roger,
On Sunday, November 30, 2003, at 1:59:30 AM PST, you wrote:
> I have a hard drive with Windows XP Pro installed using NTFS. I want
> to put Mandrake 9.2 on a second hard drive.
I've done exactly this, having recently installed MDK 9.2 on m
I have a hard drive with Windows XP Pro installed
using NTFS.
I want to put Mandrake 9.2 on a second hard
drive.
If I tell the install program to put the Lilo boot
loader on the NTFS drive in the MBR will it work or will the NTFS cause problems
because Linux can't write to an NTFS drive?
R
Charles A Edwards wrote:
On Tue, 17 Jun 2003 15:30:43 -0600
FemmeFatale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Smart but it makes windows think later (if you try
their GUIed partitioner) that something is wrong.
Just a comment/warning here.
I have, without problem, on various systems used PM, S
At 05:55 PM 6/17/2003 -0400, you wrote:
On Tue, 17 Jun 2003 15:30:43 -0600
FemmeFatale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Smart but it makes windows think later (if you try
> their GUIed partitioner) that something is wrong.
Just a comment/warning here.
I have, without problem, on various systems used
On Tue, 17 Jun 2003 15:30:43 -0600
FemmeFatale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Smart but it makes windows think later (if you try
> their GUIed partitioner) that something is wrong.
Just a comment/warning here.
I have, without problem, on various systems used PM, SysCom, or
diskdrake to parti
At 09:57 AM 6/17/2003 +0100, you wrote:
I would have thought using M$ partitioning tools was the safest way of
shrinking a ntfs partition? As for the rest, the free space could be
left as such for linux, or, more usefully, a fat32 partition made for
data exchange, which is what I was recommending
> I had the same problems as you did,Discdrake will not let
> you shrink the NTFS drive,this not a Linux problem.It's caused by XP
> building non-existent swap files on your Hard Drive,it does not matter
> how many times you run Defrag of Scandisk,it will not play.
The first time i in
Ralph,
I'd recommend using Partition Magic to carry out all your manipulations
on XP. Follow the preparatory steps recommended by PM. Then use PM to
shrink the space allocated to XP. If your user data are on a separate
virtual drive, convert that to FAT32. Install MD in the free space and
install l
On Tue, 2003-06-17 at 06:34, Ralph Bagwell wrote:
> My effort to install Mandrake 9.1 on a PC that has Windows XP already
> installed has stopped at the "partitioning" phase twice . I now recall
> a comment somewhere that Linux doesn't like NTFS systems - Can I
> install on this XP machine that is
AND ALWAYS bacup data prior to partitioning/repartitioning, there is
ALWAYS a chance of data loss.
Cheers
Jason
FemmeFatale wrote:
At 10:27 PM 6/16/2003 +0100, you wrote:
I don't know xp - never used it - but w2k had a partitioning tool
built in IIRC. If it's still there in windows, see if
At 10:02 PM 6/16/2003 +, you wrote:
You won't be able to install linux on an NTFS partition - linux can read NTFS
but writing is unreliable. You'll need to use some partioning tool to resize
your NTFS partition so linux can be installed. I used partition magic pro
- it
can create Linux Ext2
At 10:27 PM 6/16/2003 +0100, you wrote:
I don't know xp - never used it - but w2k had a partitioning tool
built in IIRC. If it's still there in windows, see if you can create
your fat32 partition there.
Anne
NOO!
Quoting Anne Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Monday 16 Jun 2003 9:34 pm, Ralph Bagwell wrote:
> > My effort to install Mandrake 9.1 on a PC that has Windows XP
> > already installed has stopped at the "partitioning" phase twice . I
> > now recall a comment somewhere that Linux doesn't like NTFS s
On Monday 16 Jun 2003 9:34 pm, Ralph Bagwell wrote:
> My effort to install Mandrake 9.1 on a PC that has Windows XP
> already installed has stopped at the "partitioning" phase twice . I
> now recall a comment somewhere that Linux doesn't like NTFS systems
> - Can I install on this XP machine that i
My effort to install Mandrake 9.1 on a PC that has
Windows XP already installed has stopped at the "partitioning" phase twice . I
now recall a comment somewhere that Linux doesn't like NTFS systems - Can I
install on this XP machine that is using NTFS? If not can I use Partition Magic
and cr
The recovery disks I've seen just wipe out everything and set the
machine up in an arbitrary predetermined way. Therefore I would say
that it doesn't matter what you try - at worst you can put it back the
way it came.
Brian
On Mon, 2002-01-28 at 15:10, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> i was thinkign
i was thinkign of using a program like that.. but i'm trying to do this on a laptop. and the only way i have of re installing XP it i screw it up (again) is w/ the recovery disk. will those still work if i use some type of partition program..
Joe
Partition Magic is one of the best known and most
popular. I heard of a free one but do not recall it at this
moment.
hello. does anyone know of any program i can u use to resize my NTFS hard drive. it won't let me do it on the install. and i can't do it when i install windows cause it uses a recovery image.. so i'm lookin for something that will let me resize to make another partition that i could put linux on..
Try http://linux-ntfs.sourceforge.net/.
On Wed, 02 Jan 2002 23:55:05 -0600, Michael Viron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:> Which version of Windows is it from? If it is from Windows 2000 / XP,
it> won't mount because it uses a newer NTFS than is supported by the current
> kernel release (I think they
XP... NTFS 5.1 I went to the http://linux-ntfs.sourceforge.net/ site
and downloaded the rpm but it still doesn't work.
On Thu, 2002-01-03 at 00:55, Michael Viron wrote:
> Which version of Windows is it from? If it is from Windows 2000 / XP, it
> won't mount because it uses a newer NTFS than
Which version of Windows is it from? If it is from Windows 2000 / XP, it
won't mount because it uses a newer NTFS than is supported by the current
kernel release (I think they support up to NTFS 4 read, and (very
experimental) write).
Michael
--
Michael Viron
Registered Linux User #81978
Senior
On 02 Jan 2002 21:45:56 -0500, Noah Swint <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> NTFS is compiled in the kernel but I'm unable to mount the drive
>
> I get the error:
>
> mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/hda2,
>or too many mounted file systems
>
> If it is a bad superblock
NTFS is compiled in the kernel but I'm unable to mount the drive
I get the error:
mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/hda2,
or too many mounted file systems
If it is a bad superblock how do I check and correct the problem and
just how many mounts are too many?
W
On Sat, 8 Sep 2001 05:16:11 -0500, Sher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dear friends:
>
> Using dual-boot LM 8.0/Win2000 (with NTFS File System).
>
> Question: Currently, Linux can only read NTFS files but not write to it. What
> is the reason for this? Is there any hope that Linux will be able to
This is a problem with Microsoft -- they like to keep the specs for NTFS 5
(as used in Win2K) secret, making it very difficult for GNU/Linux filesystem
developers to include NTFS support. NTFS support in GNU/Linux is very good in
read-only mode, but still experimental in read-write mode (Mandra
It was Mon, 16 Jul 2001 07:49:14 -0500 when Jack Gill wrote:
NTFS is implemented ReadOnly only. So it is not just you.
Paul
>I tried installing Mandrake 8.0 on a system that had Windows 2000 already on
>it, using NTFS file system. I could not get the install to work. However
>when I re-install
On Saturday 29 May 1999 22:17, you wrote:
> I've heard alot about the ntfs support module being really really buggy.
> One can read horror stories of it completely destroying some people's ntfs
> partition and needing a format. Is ntfs support really this buggy? I'm
> running windows2000 on my
I've heard alot about the ntfs support module being
really really buggy. One can read horror stories of it completely
destroying some people's ntfs partition and needing a format. Is ntfs
support really this buggy? I'm running windows2000 on my first drive and
mandrake 8.0 on my second dr
I am happy to say that I really like Mandrake 7.1. Finally it has the
support for my video card "voodoo 3000", and some of my usb devices =). I
only have one problem. I can't get to my windows 2000 partition anymore.
When the boot loader install came up, I sat there for about 5 minutes
thinking
Great, I can now access my ntfs partitions in linux. I can also access ntfs
and write to dos in any user. Now I'm wondering if linux can write to ntfs,
or just read from it?
Brent Timmer wrote:
>
> Anybody know if there is a way to see my ntfs partitions in linux?
Hello Brent,
Look at your /etc/fstab
For my setup, I added the line:
/dev/hda4 /nt40 ntfs defaults 0 0
then I added the directory "nt40" to my "/" partition
There is proably a cmd to make all thi
Anybody know if there is a way to see my ntfs partitions in linux?
On Sat, 11 Sep 1999, you wrote:
> Thats why the Write option comes with a big WARNING notice.
No kidding!!
**
Where Ever Your Head Goes Your Ass Will Follow
**
Thats why the Write option comes with a big WARNING notice.
At 08:04 AM 9/11/99 -0400, you wrote:
>Hey all,
>Well it got me finally!! I was useing my ntfs as a place to drop files and
>was writeing a cd and guess what ? I only lost about 2.5 gb of files no
>shit!!! The partition was blank and unf
Hey all,
Well it got me finally!! I was useing my ntfs as a place to drop files and
was writeing a cd and guess what ? I only lost about 2.5 gb of files no
shit!!! The partition was blank and unformated and would not even mount. Be
careful if ya use it.
Ralph
How can I allow normal users to access NTFS partitions. I'm not concerned
about writing anything i just want to be able to read some files there. No
matter what i try i keep getting Permission Denied when try to access any
NTFS mounted partition. Normal vfat partitions are working fine.
On 30 Aug, Carl J. Bauman wrote:
> I tried to mount my NTFS partition from the command line with the following result:
>
> [root@shiloh /]# mount -t ntfs /dev/hda1 /dosc
> mount: fs type ntfs not supported by kernel
>
> I was under the impression that Mandrake had NTFS support built in.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On 18 Aug, Toshiro Viera Stalker wrote:
> > A little question: I want to mount a NTFS partition at boot time, can you tell me
>syntax of the line I need to add in fstab?
> >
> > Toshiro.
>
> Sure- it's just like the other lines in /etc/fstab, except: fs type is
> ntfs,
On 18 Aug, Toshiro Viera Stalker wrote:
> A little question: I want to mount a NTFS partition at boot time, can you tell me
>syntax of the line I need to add in fstab?
>
> Toshiro.
Sure- it's just like the other lines in /etc/fstab, except: fs type is
ntfs, and you'll probably want to specify y
On Tue, 22 Jun 1999, Mark A. Walters wrote:
> Does anyone know if Linux 2.2 (Redhat 6.0) has support for accessing NT
> partitions. I have tried all permutations of the mount command to try and
> mount the NT partition. I keep getting the error message "fs type nfts not
> supported by kernel"
Does anyone know if Linux 2.2 (Redhat 6.0) has support for accessing NT
partitions. I have tried all permutations of the mount command to try and
mount the NT partition. I keep getting the error message "fs type nfts not
supported by kernel"
What is going on?
73 matches
Mail list logo
