On Monday 24 January 2005 16:01, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I am sending a mail from the user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Local host is amalasingh.com is configured and works fine from inside and
> outside.
> **
> Jan 24 20:50:37 localhost postfix/qmgr[3875]: B21F078061:
> from=<[EMAIL PR
Folks,
I have a postfix mail sending problem. Attached is the error message.
First time installed MDK 10.1, do not know how to configure the postfix.
Tried to send an email from an email client. This is the log.
Could be due to DNS setup. Do I need to setup my own DNS?
I have Dynamic DNS record
I have a new POSTFIX installation on a LAN. All mails sent with SMTP
locally are temporary deferred, they are waiting a long time in the
queue before they are delivered. If I flush them, they get delivered.
Where can I configure POSTFIX (2.1.2) to deliver mails immediately?
Regards... Béla
___
Nope, that didn't fix it. I'm still gettting the message hourly, but it's now
going to a different email account (the one I changed it to).
On Friday 16 July 2004 09:16 am, LtCdData wrote:
> LOL... i was sending my cron mails to my isp every 4 hours (after a
> reinstall ) some time back untill
LOL... i was sending my cron mails to my isp every 4 hours (after a
reinstall ) some time back untill they mailed me as told me OOPS ))
anyway i changed my aliases for root to my own account ... the end.. ))
there is a line in /etc/postfix/aliases root: root <-- change it to you
On Friday
I've been getting one of these emails every hour for the last 2 days. It's
not very descriptive. Can anyone tell me what's going on?
=-=-=
Status: R
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from me.porcupine.tld ([67.101.35.24])
by killdeer (EarthLink SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 1bLti
On Saturday 10 Jul 2004 00:52, mark rogers wrote:
> Hi Team
SNIP
>
> Problem 2)
>
> The PC that downloads POP mail from the ML10 PC Is
> having trouble sending mail to the ML10 box. Keep in
> mind that people from the outside world (internet) are
> currently sending mail to it - just the internal
>
Hi Team
Still comming to grips with ML10, have hit two
problems, I have setup Postfix to handle 3 domains,
all resolving to the one domain. Postfix correctly
handles incomming mail to the correct user mail boxes.
I can also now download/fetch/get those mail messages
from another POP3 compliant mai
On Sun, 2004-07-04 at 17:01, Derek Jennings wrote:
> On Sunday 04 Jul 2004 18:27, Terence Golightly wrote:
> > On Sun, 2004-07-04 at 12:41, Derek Jennings wrote:
> > > On Sunday 04 Jul 2004 16:58, Terence Golightly wrote:
> > > > On Sun, 2004-07-04 at 11:45, Derek Jennings wrote:
> After reading
On Sun, 2004-07-04 at 14:45, Derek Jennings wrote:
> On Sunday 04 Jul 2004 18:27, Terence Golightly wrote:
> SNIP
> > >
> > > Your main.cf contains the lines
> > > myhostname = tbox.blrm.myhouse.net
> > > mydomain = myhouse.net
> > > masquerade_domains = myhouse.net
> > > myorigin = myhouse.net
> >
Terence Golightly wrote:
On Sun, 2004-07-04 at 11:45, Derek Jennings wrote:
Hmmm
Your mail header includes the line
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
tbox.blrm.myhouse.net resolves to 220.80.108.83 which is a block
>>belonging to an ISP in Korea. It does not seem likely that someone
>>in the US woul
On Sun, 2004-07-04 at 11:45, Derek Jennings wrote:
> >
> >
> > Starting nmap 3.50 ( http://www.insecure.org/nmap/ ) at 2004-07-04 01:15
> > EDT sendto in send_tcp_raw: sendto(3, packet, 60, 0, 220.80.108.83, 16) =>
> > Operation not permitted sendto in send_tcp_raw: sendto(3, packet, 60, 0,
> > 22
On Sunday 04 Jul 2004 15:40, Terence Golightly wrote:
> List,
>
> Postfix has quit working and I suspect someone has broken in, but I
> don't know where to begin looking on my system. Below is an attempt to
> start postfix:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# postfix start
> postfix: fatal: parameter ine
On Sun, 2004-07-04 at 11:16, Bambang Gunawan wrote:
> On Sun, 04 Jul 2004 10:40:58 -0400, Terence Golightly
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > List,
> >
> > Postfix has quit working and I suspect someone has broken in, but I
> > don't know where to begin looking on my system. Below is an attempt to
On Sun, 04 Jul 2004 10:40:58 -0400, Terence Golightly
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> List,
>
> Postfix has quit working and I suspect someone has broken in, but I
> don't know where to begin looking on my system. Below is an attempt to
> start postfix:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# postfix start
>
List,
Postfix has quit working and I suspect someone has broken in, but I
don't know where to begin looking on my system. Below is an attempt to
start postfix:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# postfix start
postfix: fatal: parameter inet_interfaces: no local interface found for
220.80.108.83
I have inc
Haiz newbie,
1.
how to configure postfix to make its own log
e.g.
/etc/postfix.log
I have this in main.cf
debug_peer_level = 2
but it makes loging in syslog file!
2.
and how to limit log file size, so it doesn't grow too lage? (the
same Q for amavis too)
--
Derek,
Thanks again. I'll fiddle some more with it tonight and let the list
know my results.
Terry
Terry Golightly ... [EMAIL PROTECTED] ... Pittsburgh, Pa
Mandrake Linux release 10.0 (Official) for i586 kernel
2.6.3-9mdk-i686-up-4GB
19:44:21 up 2 days, 2:25, 2 users, load average: 0.12, 0.2
On Friday 28 May 2004 23:42, Terence Golightly wrote:
SNIP
>
> Which file do I use to set this variable? I was using webmin to attempt
> administration.
>
It is in /etc/postfix/main.cf but you can use webmin>GeneralOptions>'What
domains to receive mail for'
>
> May 28 17:59:07 tbox postfix/qmg
On Fri, 2004-05-28 at 04:15, Derek Jennings wrote:
Derek,
I did a little more snooping. See below:
>
> Hi Terry
> I'll revise my page to make it clear that Port 25 needs to be open in the
> firewall. I know others have been caught out like that. No it will not
> compromise your security. If
On Friday 28 May 2004 03:08, Terence Golightly wrote:
> List,
>
> Where do I begin? First was having no local mail delivery. I thought
> I'd install Postfix. So I went to Derek Jennings web site. Nice, but I
> just have a standalone machine with an ADSL connection. I read some of
> the docs setu
List,
Where do I begin? First was having no local mail delivery. I thought
I'd install Postfix. So I went to Derek Jennings web site. Nice, but I
just have a standalone machine with an ADSL connection. I read some of
the docs setup some aliases for root and no go. I no get mail. My log
files sh
I've tryed to install postfix+courier-imap+courier_pop+mysql
everuthig starts normaly, bt I can't send any mail to this server.
I get this error message:
May 25 08:51:59 server postfix/smtpd[6032]: connect from unknown[10.0.0.3]
May 25 08:51:59 server postfix/smtpd[6032]: warning: connect to m
On Sun, 2004-05-16 at 13:25, JoeHill wrote:
> On Sun, 16 May 2004 11:18:39 +0800
> frankieh disseminated the following:
>
> > Hi Brian,
> >
> > try:
> > postalias /etc/postfix/aliases
> >
> > I thought just using: "newaliases" (sans quotes) did the same thing..
> > but I know that postalias work
On Sun, 16 May 2004 11:18:39 +0800
frankieh disseminated the following:
> Hi Brian,
>
> try:
> postalias /etc/postfix/aliases
>
> I thought just using: "newaliases" (sans quotes) did the same thing..
> but I know that postalias works fine.
>
> I have no idea why its looking in mailman for the a
Hi Brian,
try:
postalias /etc/postfix/aliases
I thought just using: "newaliases" (sans quotes) did the same thing..
but I know that postalias works fine.
I have no idea why its looking in mailman for the alias file though..
check in /etc/postfix/main.cf for alias_maps and/or alias_database
and see
ok great. Thank you.
- Original Message -
From: "Richard Urwin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, January 11, 2004 0442 N6REJ
Subject: Re: [newbie] Postfix configuration question
> On Sunday 11 Jan 2004 9:02 am, Troy T. Hall wrote
On Sunday 11 Jan 2004 9:02 am, Troy T. Hall wrote:
> I'm confused by the postfix documentation.
> I have my cable modem going to a router which is providing NAT to the
> server via dhcp. My ip is provided dynamically but so far has stayed at
> 64.72.62.150. The routers gateway ip is 192.168.123.2
I'm confused by the postfix
documentation.
I have my cable modem going to a router which is
providing NAT to the server via dhcp. My ip is provided dynamically but so
far has stayed at 64.72.62.150. The routers gateway ip is
192.168.123.254. So does the documentation below mean that for t
On Sat, 10 Jan 2004 12:03:07 -0500
Bryan Phinney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Saturday 10 January 2004 11:23 am, Richard Urwin wrote:
>
> > > I have to question that. I know it's better known, but I get far
> > > better rates under POPFile than I did when I tried SA. POPFile
> > > functions
On Sat, 10 Jan 2004 16:44:40 +, Anne Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I suspect that's the crucial bit. SA must be very capable to keep its
> good name, but it does take a lot of training. POPFilter, OTOH,
> seems to train very quickly. I had to re-install a couple of weeks
> ago, so
On Sat, 10 Jan 2004 18:28:10 +
Derek Jennings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> No It will not work with IMAP since Kmail cannot apply filters with IMAP.
>
> This solution is only good for a single user with Kmail getting posts with
> POP3
Really? KMail won't put the messages through Spamassissin
On Sat, 10 Jan 2004 14:48:43 +
Richard Urwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Saturday 10 Jan 2004 1:41 pm, JoeHill wrote:
> > On Sat, 10 Jan 2004 13:36:11 +
> >
> > Derek Jennings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Flattered as I am that Joe has referenced my mailserver HOWTO there is a
> >
On Saturday 10 Jan 2004 H:37, Anne Wilson wrote:
> On Saturday 10 January 2004 12:48, Richard Urwin wrote:
> > I have Postfix running an SMTP server, so I don't use POP3,
> > Fetchmail etc, just Postfix.
> >
> > I need a spam-blocker. Can anyone point me to a How-To on the
> > subject? I've seen p
ROFL!
Lanman
*** REPLY SEPARATOR ***
On 1/10/2004 at 9:14 AM Aron Smith wrote:
>On Sat, 2004-01-10 at 08:05, Lanman wrote:
>> *** REPLY SEPARATOR ***
>>
>> On 1/10/2004 at 11:02 AM JoeHill wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> >Or the one that makes Homer 'giggle like a schoo
On Sat, 2004-01-10 at 08:05, Lanman wrote:
> *** REPLY SEPARATOR ***
>
> On 1/10/2004 at 11:02 AM JoeHill wrote:
>
>
>
> >Or the one that makes Homer 'giggle like a schoolgirl':
> "titmouse".
> >
>
> I rest my case!
>
> Lanman
Two mice are in the dressing room at the Playboy
On Saturday 10 January 2004 17:01, Eric Huff wrote:
> > That's a very impressive number, but I don't see what POPFile
> > does
>
> I'm at 99.78% on popfile.
>
> I feel like i am cheating a little, though, since i am on a bunch
> of mailling lists that don't really get spaminated.
>
True, I don't ge
On Saturday 10 January 2004 11:23 am, Richard Urwin wrote:
> > I have to question that. I know it's better known, but I get far
> > better rates under POPFile than I did when I tried SA. POPFile
> > functions typically at 99.87% accuracy. I don't think you can better
> > that.
>
> That's a very
> That's a very impressive number, but I don't see what POPFile does
I'm at 99.78% on popfile.
I feel like i am cheating a little, though, since i am on a bunch of
mailling lists that don't really get spaminated.
eric
--
Mandrake HowTo's & More: http://twiki.mdklinuxfaq.org
Want to b
On Saturday 10 January 2004 16:23, Richard Urwin wrote:
> On Saturday 10 Jan 2004 3:16 pm, Anne Wilson wrote:
> > On Saturday 10 January 2004 14:44, Richard Urwin wrote:
> > > If I can get SpamAssassin in it is more
> > > powerful.
> >
> > I have to question that. I know it's better known, but I g
On Saturday 10 Jan 2004 3:16 pm, Anne Wilson wrote:
> On Saturday 10 January 2004 14:44, Richard Urwin wrote:
> > If I can get SpamAssassin in it is more
> > powerful.
>
> I have to question that. I know it's better known, but I get far
> better rates under POPFile than I did when I tried SA. POP
*** REPLY SEPARATOR ***
On 1/10/2004 at 11:02 AM JoeHill wrote:
>Or the one that makes Homer 'giggle like a schoolgirl':
"titmouse".
>
I rest my case!
Lanman
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
You guys have got WAY too much time on your hands! Have you
considered a second full-time job? Grin!
Cumquat?!
Gadzooks!
Lanman
*** REPLY SEPARATOR ***
On 1/10/2004 at 11:01 AM Ronald J. Hall wrote:
>On Saturday 10 January 2004 10:48 am, JoeHill wrote:
>-> On Sat, 10 Jan 200
On Sat, 10 Jan 2004 11:01:38 -0500
"Ronald J. Hall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "cumquat" always cracked me up... :-)
Or the one that makes Homer 'giggle like a schoolgirl': "titmouse".
--
JoeHill ++ ICQ # 280779813
Registered Linux user #282046
Homepage: www.orderinchaos.org
+
On Saturday 10 January 2004 10:48 am, JoeHill wrote:
-> On Sat, 10 Jan 2004 10:33:48 -0500
-> Bryan Phinney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
->
-> > granular
->
-> I love that word...almost as much as 'bludgeon', my personal fave.
->
"cumquat" always cracked me up... :-)
--
On Saturday 10 January 2004 10:10 am, JoeHill wrote:
> As long as KMail is configured to look at each message through the eyes of
> Spamassassin, it shouldn't matter where the mail is actually being
> retrieved from.
Actually, Joe, your solution provides for more control with SA as well.
Postfi
On Saturday 10 January 2004 14:44, Richard Urwin wrote:
> On Saturday 10 Jan 2004 1:37 pm, Anne Wilson wrote:
> > Could you not simple let POPFilter collect from the Postfix
> > folder and set the header line? KMail would then collect from
> > there and filter on it.
>
> I assume you mean POPFile?
On Saturday 10 January 2004 14:44, Richard Urwin wrote:
> On Saturday 10 Jan 2004 1:37 pm, Anne Wilson wrote:
> > Could you not simple let POPFilter collect from the Postfix
> > folder and set the header line? KMail would then collect from
> > there and filter on it.
>
> I assume you mean POPFile?
On Sat, 10 Jan 2004 14:48:43 +
Richard Urwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I assume it will work without POP3?
> Since there's four users on this system I'd prefer a global solution, so I may
>
> go with Joe's solution, if it doesn't get too complex.
Derek's tip should work whether you are ge
On Saturday 10 Jan 2004 1:41 pm, JoeHill wrote:
> On Sat, 10 Jan 2004 13:36:11 +
>
> Derek Jennings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Flattered as I am that Joe has referenced my mailserver HOWTO there is a
> > simpler way of invoking Spamassassin if all you want to do is use Kmail
> > to fetch yo
On Saturday 10 Jan 2004 1:37 pm, Anne Wilson wrote:
> Could you not simple let POPFilter collect from the Postfix folder and
> set the header line? KMail would then collect from there and filter
> on it.
I assume you mean POPFile? POPFilter seems to be something different. I would
have used POPF
On Sat, 10 Jan 2004 13:36:11 +
Derek Jennings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Flattered as I am that Joe has referenced my mailserver HOWTO there is a
> simpler way of invoking Spamassassin if all you want to do is use Kmail to
> fetch your POP3 mail and then test it for spam.
No, no, no, never
On Saturday 10 January 2004 12:48, Richard Urwin wrote:
> I have Postfix running an SMTP server, so I don't use POP3,
> Fetchmail etc, just Postfix.
>
> I need a spam-blocker. Can anyone point me to a How-To on the
> subject? I've seen plenty of traffic on this list about doing it
> with a POP3 fe
On Sat, 10 Jan 2004 07:51:33 -0500
JoeHill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 10 Jan 2004 12:48:06 +
> Richard Urwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I need a spam-blocker. Can anyone point me to a How-To on the subject? I've
> > seen plenty of traffic on this list about doing it with a PO
On Sat, 10 Jan 2004 12:48:06 +
Richard Urwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I need a spam-blocker. Can anyone point me to a How-To on the subject? I've
> seen plenty of traffic on this list about doing it with a POP3 feed, but they
> fit the blocker between Fetchmail and Postfix, which isn't g
I have Postfix running an SMTP server, so I don't use POP3, Fetchmail etc,
just Postfix.
I need a spam-blocker. Can anyone point me to a How-To on the subject? I've
seen plenty of traffic on this list about doing it with a POP3 feed, but they
fit the blocker between Fetchmail and Postfix, whic
On Monday 29 Dec 2003 2:05 am, Troy T. Hall wrote:
> Ok, well, i'm getting closers.
> gatekeeper can send/recieve mail from [EMAIL PROTECTED] and
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] from classicnet.net
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] can send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] BUT
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] cannot send mail as [EMAIL PROT
Ok, well, i'm getting closers.
gatekeeper can send/recieve mail from [EMAIL PROTECTED] and
[EMAIL PROTECTED] from classicnet.net
[EMAIL PROTECTED] can send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] BUT
[EMAIL PROTECTED] cannot send mail as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I get relay denied. So I'm almost! there.
Troy
Wa
PROTECTED]
Sent: 13 November 2003 20:33
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [newbie] POSTFIX in wrong time zone
On Thu, 13 Nov 2003 15:11:33 -0500 (EST)
Nigel Wilkinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Nov 2003 13:42:33 -
> Kerwick Jamie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
On Thu, 13 Nov 2003 15:11:33 -0500 (EST)
Nigel Wilkinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Nov 2003 13:42:33 -
> Kerwick Jamie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I am running a Mandrake 9.0 server which hosts our intranet. I have
> > just one small problem, my postfix server thinks its in
On Thu, 13 Nov 2003 13:42:33 -
Kerwick Jamie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am running a Mandrake 9.0 server which hosts our intranet. I have
> just one small problem, my postfix server thinks its in the (-5:00)EST
> time zone when the box itself is in the GMT Time Zone. Consequently
> all of
Ok, i turned off nagios until i can figure out how to configure
*which* services it checks. The author was correct when he said
nagios is not easy...
eric
--
Mandrake HowTo's & More: http://twiki.mdklinuxfaq.org
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
Go to http://www.ma
> >> How can i delete the messages in the queue?
>
> Better yet, use postsuper with the -d flag. Much safer then the
> above.
> Make sure to read the postsuper manual first.
Cool. Thanks,
eric
--
Mandrake HowTo's & More: http://twiki.mdklinuxfaq.org
Want to buy your Pack or Servi
Paul wrote:
On 10/20/2003 05:23 AM, Eric Huff wrote:
How can i delete the messages in the queue?
su
service postfix stop
cd /var/spool/postfix/defer and delete everything in the subdirectories
cd /var/spool/postfix/deferred and delete everything in the subdirs also.
That is how I do it. And th
On 10/20/2003 05:23 AM, Eric Huff wrote:
How can i delete the messages in the queue?
su
service postfix stop
cd /var/spool/postfix/defer and delete everything in the subdirectories
cd /var/spool/postfix/deferred and delete everything in the subdirs also.
That is how I do it. And then service
How can i delete the messages in the queue?
I have 2300 of them. Just fired up postfix for the first time a
couple days ago, and i got an immense amount of harddrive activity.
In webmin, i see the large queue.
The few mails i tried to send thru postfix the other day are in the
queue, which is
Thanks to those who answered the thread.
;-)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Derek Jennings
Sent: September 17, 2003 2:51 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [newbie] Postfix mailserver
On Wednesday 17 Sep 2003 6:34 pm, Yves Arsenault
On Wed, 17 Sep 2003 14:34:09 -0300
"Yves Arsenault" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I was wondering if anyone has some good resources on exactly how to
> configure a Postfix mail server. According to a doc that I followed I
> should be functional, but I'm not as of yet.
>
> I'm running Mandrake Lin
[...]
> Try the one on my website
or simpley read the comments in the main configuration file, they are usefull
too:
/etc/postfix/main.cf
remo
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
On Wednesday 17 Sep 2003 6:34 pm, Yves Arsenault wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I was wondering if anyone has some good resources on exactly how to
> configure a Postfix mail server. According to a doc that I followed I
> should be functional, but I'm not as of yet.
>
> I'm running Mandrake Linux 9.0
>
> TIA
Hello,
I was wondering if anyone has some good resources on exactly how to
configure a Postfix mail server. According to a doc that I followed I should
be functional, but I'm not as of yet.
I'm running Mandrake Linux 9.0
TIA
Yves Arsenault
Carrefour Infotech
5,promenade Acadian
Charlottetown,
On Wednesday 03 September 2003 04:51 pm, Mark Annandale wrote:
> Hi Guys
>
> Is it imperative to use a FQDN for postfix - Is it possible to just use
> localhost ? Sorry if this seems daft but as mentioned earlier I can't UTFM.
Postfix will work without a FQDN, but only as long as you are only runn
On Wednesday 03 Sep 2003 9:51 pm, Mark Annandale wrote:
> Hi Guys
>
> Is it imperative to use a FQDN for postfix - Is it possible to just use
> localhost ? Sorry if this seems daft but as mentioned earlier I can't UTFM.
>
> Regards
>
> Mark A
Yes it is. Postfix will not work without a domain name.
Hi Guys
Is it imperative to use a FQDN for postfix - Is it possible to just use
localhost ? Sorry if this seems daft but as mentioned earlier I can't UTFM.
Regards
Mark A
--
Mark Annandale
Mandrake 9.1 - KDE 3.1.3 - KMail 1.5.3
--
No Microsoft products were used in the
compilation of this docu
On Sat, 30 Aug 2003 13:52:30 -0400
Lee Wiggers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> uttered:
> Now I figure that if I get a mail server up on aeis.tv reliably, I
> have done everything I'm paying the host for now, right?
>
> And if I can learn enough to keep it up, I get a gold star,
> hopefully before the guys
On Sat, 30 Aug 2003 08:42:04 -0400
HaywireMac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 30 Aug 2003 08:25:35 -0400
> Lee Wiggers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> uttered:
>
> > I'm missing something. Can someone do a simple 1,2,3 or point
> > me to a tutorial on howto postfix on apache server?
>
> First off, Naz
On Sat, 30 Aug 2003 17:06:21 +0200
Bart Salien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Op Saturday 30 August 2003 14:25, schreef Lee Wiggers:
>
> Lee ,
>
> have you looked at the basic how to on the postfix site ?
>
> http://www.postfix.org/basic.html
>
> Bart.
>
>
I'll do that now, before I muddle a
On Saturday 30 Aug 2003 1:25 pm, Lee Wiggers wrote:
> Hi all
>
> Assume I'm as dumb as I feel when I get into this stuff.
>
> I have rtfm'ed my eyes out.
>
> I want to install postfix on my apache2 server, aeis.tv for use like my
> host on americanelevatorinspection.com has set up qmail.
>
> Next y
On Sat, 30 Aug 2003 08:25:35 -0400
Lee Wiggers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> uttered:
> I'm missing something. Can someone do a simple 1,2,3 or point me to a
> tutorial on howto postfix on apache server?
First off, Nazi mode here, set your line wrap to less than 72 chars,
it's nicer fer the peeps who use
Op Saturday 30 August 2003 14:25, schreef Lee Wiggers:
Lee ,
have you looked at the basic how to on the postfix site ?
http://www.postfix.org/basic.html
Bart.
> Hi all
>
> Assume I'm as dumb as I feel when I get into this stuff.
>
> I have rtfm'ed my eyes out.
>
> I want to install postfix on
Hi all
Assume I'm as dumb as I feel when I get into this stuff.
I have rtfm'ed my eyes out.
I want to install postfix on my apache2 server, aeis.tv for use like my host on
americanelevatorinspection.com has set up qmail.
Next year I expect to drop the host and do all from my happy little mdk b
I don't know if this is the right list for posting this, but is there some
way to force the postfix smtp client (for realying mail) to use only AUTH
LOGIN in its connections?
regards
netmaniac
_
MSN Hotmail, o maior webmail do Brasi
On Sat, 19 Jul 2003 08:02:08 +0530
"L.V.Gandhi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> uttered:
> I think you should write a howto in detail. I will be happy to receive
> it.
Seriously, it's as I described it. About the only thing I would add to
it would be 'read man fetchmail' for sample configs and everything you
On Thursday 17 July 2003 04:54, JoeHill wrote:
> On 17 Jul 2003 14:20:22 +1000
Sorry Stephen and Folks!
I hadn't seen this before sending the help request!
In case you get, please just ignore it!
Now for the REAL doubt!
> Stephen Kuhn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> uttered:
> > ISP (where mail sits)
>
On Thursday 17 July 2003 00:28, Stephen Kuhn wrote:
Hi! Stephen! and Folks!
This JUST what I want to do!
The problem is I'm just a wannabe techie!
I can put several things into work but, this ONE I can't 'till now!
My server is all set but I can't read email from it (from a any other machi
On Friday 18 Jul 2003 6:33 pm, JoeHill wrote:
> No problems now, finally got my head around it thanks to all for the
> help. It was dead easy, in the end.
>
> 1. Install imap package.
> 2. Configure users on server
> 3. Configure fetchmail
>
> Done.
>
> Took me the whole day, of course, and about 3
or a freebie... much better
then the network associates vscan I was using before,,, (admitadly an old
version).
the web interface is an exceptional feature...
#
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of David Laulusa-D
David Laulusa-D28 wrote:
Here's the link to download FileScan for Linux.
http://www.trendmicro.com.au/member/Products/up_other.htm
Franki, you mentioned that the virus engine was updateable. Does that
mean that I can download the virus engine for FileProtect for Linux
(which is the new non-fre
On Fri, Jul 18, 2003 at 05:37:49AM +0800, Frankie wrote:
> Todd,
>
> Trend filescan for linux is free..
>
> I have been using it for several years.. its great.
> and trophie is free also, its what turns filecan into a daemonised scanner.
>
> If you can't find filescan, let me know and I can put
On Fri, Jul 18, 2003 at 05:37:49AM +0800, Frankie wrote:
> If you can't find filescan, let me know and I can put the tarball up for
> you.
>
> on the amavis homepage (not the amavis-new one, I mean amavis.org) in the
> contrib section is a post from me on how to get it, how to install it on
> mand
On Fri, 18 Jul 2003 16:51:42 +0800
"Frankie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> uttered:
> However, if after alot of fiddling you find postfix is just not
> working as it should be, remove it and reinstall... I remember on the
> list and experianced it myself where the postfix installed during
> setup was missin
D]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of JoeHill
Sent: Friday, 18 July 2003 8:11 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [newbie] Postfix and POP3
On Fri, 18 Jul 2003 06:14:45 +0800
"Frankie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> uttered:
> If I might ask,, why did you load on the courier rpm??
>
>
On Thu, 2003-07-17 at 18:22, ed tharp wrote:
> On Thu, 2003-07-17 at 11:09, JoeHill wrote:
> > On 17 Jul 2003 20:00:11 +1000
> > Stephen Kuhn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> uttered:
> >
> > > Starting at $20/mo or half-oz for half'a'year!
> >
> > Good one, I nearly spewed my coffee when I read this!
> >
>
On Thu, 2003-07-17 at 18:18, JoeHill wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Jul 2003 20:51:46 -0400
> JoeHill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> uttered:
>
> > Tried going in by IP, user and pass, no go.
> >
> > This imap package, is there a site for docs and FAQs?
>
> aah ha ha ha ha, it works! it *really works*! I am so ex
On Thu, 2003-07-17 at 11:09, JoeHill wrote:
> On 17 Jul 2003 20:00:11 +1000
> Stephen Kuhn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> uttered:
>
> > Starting at $20/mo or half-oz for half'a'year!
>
> Good one, I nearly spewed my coffee when I read this!
>
> Oh, shit, I could really get into that. I'll even write a for
On Thu, 17 Jul 2003 20:51:46 -0400
JoeHill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> uttered:
> Tried going in by IP, user and pass, no go.
>
> This imap package, is there a site for docs and FAQs?
aah ha ha ha ha, it works! it *really works*! I am so excited, I'm
gonna...I'm gonna... gonna send some more test e-
On Fri, 18 Jul 2003 01:21:04 +0100
Derek Jennings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> uttered:
> Shouldn't that last line be :-
> poll pop2.sympatico.ca with proto POP3
> user 'b1bhxi89' there with password 'xxx' is 'test0001' here
> options
> nokeep
that was it!! good eye son, I never caught that, thank
On Fri, 18 Jul 2003 01:31:42 +0100
Derek Jennings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> uttered:
> It was me who recommended courier-imap-pop because it allows you to
> use a different username/password to your regular login. Since pop3
> gives usernames/passwords in plain text it can be a security risk.
Gotcha. I
On Friday 18 Jul 2003 1:11 am, JoeHill wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Jul 2003 06:14:45 +0800
>
> "Frankie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> uttered:
> > If I might ask,, why did you load on the courier rpm??
> >
> > the only time I have done that was for imap..
> >
> > As far as pop3 goes, the normal imap rpm contains a
On Thursday 17 Jul 2003 9:36 pm, JoeHill wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Jul 2003 12:40:05 +0100
>
> Derek Jennings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> uttered:
> > Postfix will pass the mail to Procmail if it exists, or will put the
> > mail in the mailbox defined in /etc/postfix/main.cf home_mailbox
> > parameter
>
> So far
1 - 100 of 298 matches
Mail list logo
