On Tuesday December 3 2002 07:09 pm, John Richard Smith wrote:
> That only leaves the cookers,
>
> How risky is it going to be, I mean , what other choice left to me
> is there. What have I got to loose, a buggered up printer maybe,
> a sodded up oS, well if the worse comes to the worse I can
> pu
Stephen Kuhn wrote:
On Wed, 2002-12-04 at 19:37, Derek Jennings wrote:
SNIP
Thanks everyone for the advice, I achieved the result,
unfortunately no update was offered. I only got the
standard M9.0 install, which are broken.
I was connected to the net.
I guess I'm down to forcing cooker i
Derek Jennings wrote:
SNIP
Thanks everyone for the advice, I achieved the result,
unfortunately no update was offered. I only got the
standard M9.0 install, which are broken.
I was connected to the net.
I guess I'm down to forcing cooker installs, as an OS with a broken
printer driver is usel
On Wed, 2002-12-04 at 19:37, Derek Jennings wrote:
> SNIP
> > >
> > > Thanks everyone for the advice, I achieved the result,
> > > unfortunately no update was offered. I only got the
> > > standard M9.0 install, which are broken.
> > > I was connected to the net.
> > >
> > > I guess I'm down to for
SNIP
> >
> > Thanks everyone for the advice, I achieved the result,
> > unfortunately no update was offered. I only got the
> > standard M9.0 install, which are broken.
> > I was connected to the net.
> >
> > I guess I'm down to forcing cooker installs, as an OS with a broken
> > printer driver is
Derek Jennings wrote:
On Wednesday 04 Dec 2002 12:33 am, John Richard Smith wrote:
Derek Jennings wrote:
On Tuesday 03 Dec 2002 10:54 pm, John Richard Smith wrote:
Derek Jennings wrote:
On Tuesday 03 Dec 2002 6:57 pm, John Richard Smith wrote:
I am trying to upd
On Wednesday 04 Dec 2002 12:33 am, John Richard Smith wrote:
> Derek Jennings wrote:
> >On Tuesday 03 Dec 2002 10:54 pm, John Richard Smith wrote:
> >>Derek Jennings wrote:
> >>>On Tuesday 03 Dec 2002 6:57 pm, John Richard Smith wrote:
> I am trying to update a printer driver, having removed th
Derek Jennings wrote:
On Tuesday 03 Dec 2002 10:54 pm, John Richard Smith wrote:
Derek Jennings wrote:
On Tuesday 03 Dec 2002 6:57 pm, John Richard Smith wrote:
I am trying to update a printer driver, having removed the old ones.
[root@localhost root]# rpm -i --force
/mnt/ext2-vol
On Tuesday 03 Dec 2002 10:54 pm, John Richard Smith wrote:
> Derek Jennings wrote:
> >On Tuesday 03 Dec 2002 6:57 pm, John Richard Smith wrote:
> >>I am trying to update a printer driver, having removed the old ones.
> >>
> >>[root@localhost root]# rpm -i --force
> >>/mnt/ext2-vol6/downloads2/libgi
Derek Jennings wrote:
On Tuesday 03 Dec 2002 6:57 pm, John Richard Smith wrote:
I am trying to update a printer driver, having removed the old ones.
[root@localhost root]# rpm -i --force
/mnt/ext2-vol6/downloads2/libgimpprint1-4.2.3-5mdk.i586.rpm
/mnt/ext2-vol6/downloads2/libgimpprint1-4.2.3-
On Tuesday December 3 2002 02:28 pm, Stephen Kuhn wrote:
> What about using:
>
> rpm -Uivh --force --no-deps
>
> ...as the command instead?
Usually a _very_ bad idea. --force is useful if you're installing an
rpm over an rpm of the same version because you screwed it up. --nodeps
is useful
I am trying to update a printer driver, having removed the old ones.
[root@localhost root]# rpm -i --force
/mnt/ext2-vol6/downloads2/libgimpprint1-4.2.3-5mdk.i586.rpm
/mnt/ext2-vol6/downloads2/libgimpprint1-4.2.3-5mdk.i586.rpm: read
manifest failed: Success
[root@localhost root]#
why won't it
12 matches
Mail list logo
