On Mon, 2003-03-24 at 16:41, Stephen Kuhn wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-03-25 at 07:35, H.J.Bathoorn wrote:
>
> > I noticed with 9.1rc1 that KDE insistantly used about 80% cpu whilst only the
> > Windowmanager (i.e. no extra prog's) was running. In Icewm no such problem.
> > On my desktop (P4) this was n
On Mon, 2003-03-24 at 17:38, Stephen Kuhn wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-03-25 at 07:59, Adolfo Bello wrote:
>
> > I also booted Gnome and processor load was the same. I didn't try Icewm.
> >
> > I thought of booting in runlevel 3 but then I recalled that I didn't
> > know how to look at processor load pe
On Tue, 2003-03-25 at 07:59, Adolfo Bello wrote:
> I also booted Gnome and processor load was the same. I didn't try Icewm.
>
> I thought of booting in runlevel 3 but then I recalled that I didn't
> know how to look at processor load per process from the cli.
>
> Is there any command to do this?
On Mon, 2003-03-24 at 16:41, Stephen Kuhn wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-03-25 at 07:35, H.J.Bathoorn wrote:
>
> > I noticed with 9.1rc1 that KDE insistantly used about 80% cpu whilst only the
> > Windowmanager (i.e. no extra prog's) was running. In Icewm no such problem.
> > On my desktop (P4) this was n
On Monday 24 March 2003 21:41, Stephen Kuhn wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-03-25 at 07:35, H.J.Bathoorn wrote:
> > I noticed with 9.1rc1 that KDE insistantly used about 80% cpu whilst only
> > the Windowmanager (i.e. no extra prog's) was running. In Icewm no such
> > problem. On my desktop (P4) this was no
On Tue, 2003-03-25 at 07:35, H.J.Bathoorn wrote:
> I noticed with 9.1rc1 that KDE insistantly used about 80% cpu whilst only the
> Windowmanager (i.e. no extra prog's) was running. In Icewm no such problem.
> On my desktop (P4) this was no real problem but my laptop wasn't useable to my
> liking
On Monday 24 March 2003 21:08, Adolfo Bello wrote:
> Now I have to find out what might be causing keventd to overload my
> processor the way is doing it.
>
> With regard to damaging the /boot partition I didn't gather any
> additional information. I just reinstalled 9.0.
I noticed with 9.1rc1 that
On Mon, 2003-03-24 at 15:53, H.J.Bathoorn wrote:
> Yeah, well keventd is one or other KDE prog starting up AFAIK. So there is
> something starting up and not working as it should, probably konq I'd guess.
>
> Usually, if I get suspicious of KDE in general I start up an Icewm-session
> (because
On Monday 24 March 2003 20:08, Adolfo Bello wrote:
> On Mon, 2003-03-24 at 14:32, H.J.Bathoorn wrote:
> > On Monday 24 March 2003 06:30, Adolfo Bello wrote:
> > > (Any idea about the 100% processor load?)
> > >
> > > Saludos
> >
> > That's just konq trying to read the file systems on those CD's and
On Mon, 2003-03-24 at 01:39, Guy Rouillier wrote:
> Well, I can't help with your original question - sorry. But I bought a
> pack of the cheapest CD-R's available - Optimum - got a 50 pack for 94
> **cents**. And I haven't had a single error on the 10 that I've burned
> so far. Before you toss
- Original Message -
From: "Adolfo Bello" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "MDK Mandrake" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, March 24, 2003 12:30 AM
Subject: Re: [newbie] 9.1 CD format
> Meanwhile, I am going to get some other brand CD's to be ready. I
bur
On Sun, 2003-03-23 at 20:43, Stephen Kuhn wrote:
> Hey, I had the same problems, but solved them by copying the entire CD's
> to my HD - and then just changed the location of the files in the
> Software Manager - once I did that, all those niggling little problems
> disappeared...but that was my r
On Mon, 2003-03-24 at 00:44, Adolfo Bello wrote:
> I have had a lot of problems trying to make 9.1rc2 work in my laptop.
>
> I downloaded the three iso images and checked their MD5 string. Everything
> fine.
>
> I burned the CDs and started to install rc2. No problem. Worked like a
> charm.
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of H.J.Bathoorn
> Hmmm, I think I mentioned it before but, too cheap CD rw's
> give me the same
> problem. I can read them in the drive I burned them with (I
> use Gcombust) but
> not on my laptop.
> O
On Sunday 23 March 2003 15:45, Adolfo Bello wrote:
> > Adolfo,
> > I don't get it.
> > Are you saying you installed rc2 on your laptop and now can't
> > install from the
> > very same cd's a second time?
> >
> > Doesn't sound very logic to me.
> >
> > good luck,
> > HarM
>
> No, that's not the prob
> Adolfo,
> I don't get it.
> Are you saying you installed rc2 on your laptop and now can't
> install from the
> very same cd's a second time?
>
> Doesn't sound very logic to me.
>
> good luck,
> HarM
No, that's not the problem.
I burned the three CD and installed 9.1 but when I tried to ac
On Sunday 23 March 2003 14:58, Adolfo Bello wrote:
>
> I launched KDE System Guard and found the guilty process: keventd (no idea
> about what it does or means). It kept using between 80 and 90% of processor
> load.
>
Adolfo,
I don't get it.
Are you saying you installed rc2 on your laptop and no
I launched KDE System Guard and found the guilty process: keventd (no idea
about what it does or means). It kept using between 80 and 90% of processor
load.
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
18 matches
Mail list logo
