On Sun, Feb 09, 2003 at 09:14:36AM +0200, Gil Katz wrote:
> Ok
> i didn??? express myself ouite clear enough
> i got several accounts in hotmail and the easiest way to handel them is by
> outlook express so that what i need.
> Gil
I'm not sure I understand what you want to do. Do you want to acce
On Sat, 8 Feb 2003 10:58:30 +0200, Gil Katz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> is there any HTML e-mail client like outlook express?
There are several. If you're familiar with Outlook Express you'll feel right at home
with Evolution. It does everything Outlook does except propagate viruses.
--
Warre
On Sunday 09 February 2003 01:18 am, robin wrote:
> I've used it on a couple of occasions in the last few years. Sometimes
> I need to use non-ascii characters, and can't rely on the receiver
> having the ability to decode any other way. Once I had to circulate a
> document that wanted very cle
FemmeFatale wrote:
At 09:04 PM 2/8/2003 -0500, you wrote:
You must have some artistic/creative/designer-type friends, because all
of the HTML mail eye candy I get is spam. And from all the spam, most is
not eye candy but really poorly designed (I know from seeing the wife's
spam in Mozilla).
Ok
i didnṫ express myself ouite clear enough
i got several accounts in hotmail and the easiest way to handel them is by
outlook express so that what i need.
Gil
On Sunday 09 February 2003 06:11, Hendrik Boom wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 08, 2003 at 09:04:20PM -0500, Todd Slater wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 08,
On Sat, Feb 08, 2003 at 09:04:20PM -0500, Todd Slater wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 08, 2003 at 05:35:43PM -0700, FemmeFatale wrote:
> >
> > I'm going to risk abolishment to M$hits camp here or excommunication from
> > the Linux community by saying this... but what else is new?
> >
> > Russ I have to agr
On Saturday 08 February 2003 09:12 pm, Chuck Burns wrote:
>
> You forgot something. Some people have friends that like to change their
> font styles, sizes, and colors (colours for you brits out there). And txt
> mode email doesnt allow that at all.
Don't forget, they top post too.
--
Greg
W
At 09:04 PM 2/8/2003 -0500, you wrote:
You must have some artistic/creative/designer-type friends, because all
of the HTML mail eye candy I get is spam. And from all the spam, most is
not eye candy but really poorly designed (I know from seeing the wife's
spam in Mozilla).
But I do get HTML ma
On Saturday 08 February 2003 8:04 pm, Todd Slater wrote:
*snip*
> You must have some artistic/creative/designer-type friends, because all
> of the HTML mail eye candy I get is spam. And from all the spam, most is
> not eye candy but really poorly designed (I know from seeing the wife's
> spam in Mo
On Sat, Feb 08, 2003 at 05:35:43PM -0700, FemmeFatale wrote:
>
> I'm going to risk abolishment to M$hits camp here or excommunication from
> the Linux community by saying this... but what else is new?
>
> Russ I have to agree with you luvy. Most ppl love eye candy. I know I
> do. I use Evolu
At 08:22 PM 2/8/2003 -0500, you wrote:
On Saturday 08 February 2003 07:42 pm, FemmeFatale wrote:
> At 01:27 PM 2/8/2003 -0500, you wrote:
> >
> >
> >How I deal with the security risks of html mail is with filters that
> >whitelist
> >people I trust. If I receive an html e-mail from somebody not o
At 01:59 AM 2/9/2003 +0100, you wrote:
> I can post a review I had of it from a very long time ago (2001 April/May
> issue) in an issue of Maximum Linux (a now defunct magazine). If anyone
is
> interested that is, contact me offlist or post it to the list.
Please share with us
/Anders
Balsa:
On Saturday 08 February 2003 07:42 pm, FemmeFatale wrote:
> At 01:27 PM 2/8/2003 -0500, you wrote:
> >
> >
> >How I deal with the security risks of html mail is with filters that
> >whitelist
> >people I trust. If I receive an html e-mail from somebody not on my
> > trusted list, it gets sent to a
> I can post a review I had of it from a very long time ago (2001 April/May
> issue) in an issue of Maximum Linux (a now defunct magazine). If anyone
is
> interested that is, contact me offlist or post it to the list.
Please share with us
/Anders
Want to buy your Pack or Services from Mandrak
At 07:24 PM 2/8/2003 +0100, you wrote:
> You are right about the bloat but it does send and receive in HTML. I am
> still looking for the slimmed down version like OutLook Ex is to OutLook.
I have not used it myself but IIRC there is a client called Balsa that is
supposed
to be good. Perhaps som
At 01:27 PM 2/8/2003 -0500, you wrote:
How I deal with the security risks of html mail is with filters that
whitelist
people I trust. If I receive an html e-mail from somebody not on my trusted
list, it gets sent to a different folder that displays everything as plain
text, so it can be examin
>
> It may be bloated but I use almost any feature in it: mail, calendar,
> todo (tasks), contacts and particularly helpful to me, an assistant
> reminding me through my cell phone/pager of every meeting or appointment
> that I may have.
Personally I prefer the traditional UNIX approach, one prog
> You are right about the bloat but it does send and receive in HTML. I am
> still looking for the slimmed down version like OutLook Ex is to OutLook.
I have not used it myself but IIRC there is a client called Balsa that is
supposed
to be good. Perhaps somebody else has used it and can give us a
On Sat, 2003-02-08 at 14:07, Russ wrote:
> You are right about the bloat but it does send and receive in HTML. I am
> still looking for the slimmed down version like OutLook Ex is to OutLook.
>
> Russ
>
> - Original Message -
> > > BTW Mozilla's mail client sucks. Evolution is the way to
On Saturday 08 February 2003 12:56 pm, Russ wrote:
> Again, I must respectfully disagree with you. Unless they can come up with
> another way to dress up plain ol text between friends and family, it will
> stay. Most people want eye candy and without it they will move on. Linux
> does not need the
You are right about the bloat but it does send and receive in HTML. I am
still looking for the slimmed down version like OutLook Ex is to OutLook.
Russ
- Original Message -
> > BTW Mozilla's mail client sucks. Evolution is the way to go.
>
> I have not used Mozilla, but I think that Evolu
> Sure there is. Evolution is one, kmail is another. The first one is
> fancier (more like complete Outlook version, but buggy, at least in the
> 1.0.8 version) and there is kmail which is a pure mail client, working
> very nicely. The only thing which GNU/linux software never managed to
> achie
Again, I must respectfully disagree with you. Unless they can come up with
another way to dress up plain ol text between friends and family, it will
stay. Most people want eye candy and without it they will move on. Linux
does not need the various GUI's to operate, but in order to get more people
o
On Sat, Feb 08, 2003 at 09:23:18AM -0800, Russ wrote:
> When sending emails to lists and for general use, yes text only is
> acceptable and actually how it should be. This is NOT so for many family and
> friends that are spread the world over. Being able to dress up your letters
> and send pictures
On Sat, Feb 08, 2003 at 11:15:18AM +0200, Gil Katz wrote:
> Evolution got POP or IMAP what i need is a e-mail client to connect to hotmail
> Gil
>
>
As far as I know. hotmail uses a "special" protocol which outlook
express and possibly the latest version of outlook can connect to... If
you are us
> BTW Mozilla's mail client sucks. Evolution is the way to go.
I have not used Mozilla, but I think that Evolution is bloated, the
use I would think for it would be in an office where you might
need everything but the kitchen sink
/Anders
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
When sending emails to lists and for general use, yes text only is
acceptable and actually how it should be. This is NOT so for many family and
friends that are spread the world over. Being able to dress up your letters
and send pictures inline (so you can explain the photo) is a big thing and
cann
On Sat, 2003-02-08 at 12:34, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Hi
> > is there any HTML e-mail client like outlook express?
> > Gil
>
> Hi Gil,
>
> Sure there is. Evolution is one, kmail is another. The first one is
> fancier (more like complete Outlook version, but buggy, at least in the
> 1.0.8 ve
Does Kmail handle HTML??
Russ
- Original Message -
> > Hi
> > is there any HTML e-mail client like outlook express?
> > Gil
>
> Hi Gil,
>
> Sure there is. Evolution is one, kmail is another. The first one is
> fancier (more like complete Outlook version, but buggy, at least in the
>
> Hi
> is there any HTML e-mail client like outlook express?
> Gil
Hi Gil,
Sure there is. Evolution is one, kmail is another. The first one is
fancier (more like complete Outlook version, but buggy, at least in the
1.0.8 version) and there is kmail which is a pure mail client, working
very nice
On Sat, 2003-02-08 at 12:56, robin wrote:
> If you use Mozilla, the Hermes addon apparently allows reading of
> hotmail and some other web-based account as though they were POP3
> accounts. See http://hermes.mozdev.org/index.html
Not quite.. all hermes does is add a sidebar which gives you a dr
Pupeno wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday 08 February 2003 04:15 am, Gil Katz wrote:
On Saturday 08 February 2003 11:04, Paul wrote:
In reply to Gil's mail, d.d. Sat, 8 Feb 2003 10:58:30 +0200:
Hi
is there any HTML e-mail client like outlook express?
Gil
Evol
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday 08 February 2003 04:15 am, Gil Katz wrote:
> On Saturday 08 February 2003 11:04, Paul wrote:
> > In reply to Gil's mail, d.d. Sat, 8 Feb 2003 10:58:30 +0200:
> > >Hi
> > >is there any HTML e-mail client like outlook express?
> > >Gil
> >
>
In reply to Adolfo's mail, d.d. Sat, 8 Feb 2003 05:30:30 -0400:
>> Evolution got POP or IMAP what i need is a e-mail client to
>> connect to hotmail
>> Gil
>What you need is another mail account :-)
*grin*
Hotmail is a Micro$osft proprietary 'protocol' as far as I know.
I have not heard about a
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Gil Katz
> Sent: Saturday, February 08, 2003 5:15 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [newbie] HTML e-mail client
>
>
> On Saturday 08 February 2003 11:04, Paul w
On Saturday 08 February 2003 11:04, Paul wrote:
> In reply to Gil's mail, d.d. Sat, 8 Feb 2003 10:58:30 +0200:
> >Hi
> >is there any HTML e-mail client like outlook express?
> >Gil
>
> Evolution should be what you look for.
> Paul
Evolution got POP or IMAP what i need is a e-mail client to connect
In reply to Gil's mail, d.d. Sat, 8 Feb 2003 10:58:30 +0200:
>Hi
>is there any HTML e-mail client like outlook express?
>Gil
Evolution should be what you look for.
Paul
--
Some Windows were made to be broken.
http://nlpagan.net - Linux by Mandrake - Sylpheed by Hiro
Want to buy your Pack or S
37 matches
Mail list logo
