Re: [newbie] New Millenium

2000-01-05 Thread phins13
Ernest N. Wilcox Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Sad to say that the counter argument is as follows: at the time the gregorian >calandar was greated, the concept of a year zero or of the value zero as a >number did not exist. Therefore even though there was no year zero in the first >millenium, th

Re: [Re: [newbie] New Millenium]

2000-01-05 Thread Jeanette Russo
gt; To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, January 02, 2000 9:03 AM Subject: Re: [Re: [newbie] New Millenium] > Food for thought... > I checked my Mom's elderly 486 66 with a Phoenix BIOS and Win3.11 and > discovered that it had defaulted to 1980, a simple reset of the date a

Re: [newbie] New Millenium

2000-01-05 Thread Ernest N. Wilcox Jr.
| To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Sent: Saturday, January 01, 2000 07:25 | Subject: Re: [newbie] New Millenium | | | > On Fri, 31 Dec 1999, Warren Doney wrote: | > | 00.32 01/01/00 NZDT | > | Happy new Millenium all... | > | | > | -- | > | Full

Re: [Re: [Re: [newbie] New Millenium]]

2000-01-02 Thread Michael Scottaline
Jaguar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Food for thought... > I checked my Mom's elderly 486 66 with a Phoenix BIOS and Win3.11 and > discovered that it had defaulted to 1980, a simple reset of the date and all > is well...MS Word correctly inserts present date + 2000 > Jaguar

Re: [Re: [newbie] New Millenium]

2000-01-02 Thread Jaguar
oecke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: Saturday, January 01, 2000 12:20 PM > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Subject: Re: [newbie] New Millenium > > > > > > > > > Yes that is true, but it has been said that somewhere along the > > > line

Re: [newbie] New Millenium

2000-01-01 Thread Etien
t; Sent: Saturday, January 01, 2000 12:20 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: [newbie] New Millenium > > > > > > Yes that is true, but it has been said that somewhere along the > > lines we all > > lost a year, so is it the year 2000 or the year 2001??

RE: [newbie] New Millenium

2000-01-01 Thread david clark
nd they didn't even imagine that the programs would still be in > use come 2000. > > > -Original Message- > > From: Etien T. VanDenBroecke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Saturday, January 01, 2000 12:20 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROT

Re: [newbie] New Millenium

2000-01-01 Thread Daniel
s > > the first millennia, 1001 AD through 2000 the second (see a pattern > > forming?) and the third millennia starts 2001. Just some food for > > thought... > > > > Dan > > > > > > - Original Message - > > From: "Ernest N. Wilcox Jr." &l

RE: [newbie] New Millenium

2000-01-01 Thread Axalon Bloodstone
> > From: Etien T. VanDenBroecke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Saturday, January 01, 2000 12:20 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: [newbie] New Millenium > > > > > > Yes that is true, but it has been said that somewhere along th

Re: [newbie] New Millenium

2000-01-01 Thread John Aldrich
On Sat, 01 Jan 2000, Etien T. VanDenBroecke wrote: > Yes that is true, but it has been said that somewhere along the lines we all > lost a year, so is it the year 2000 or the year 2001?? who knows, all that I > know is that the media hype about the Y2K bug, looks like it turn out to be a > big mo

Re: [newbie] New Millenium

2000-01-01 Thread Ernest N. Wilcox Jr.
On Fri, 31 Dec 1999, Warren Doney wrote: | 00.32 01/01/00 NZDT | Happy new Millenium all... | | -- | Full plate & packing steel! - Minsk I've heard all the arguments about the new millenium not starting until 1/1/2001, but I think we should all compromise, and make the entire year

Re: [newbie] New Millenium

2000-01-01 Thread Daniel
ht... Dan - Original Message - From: "Ernest N. Wilcox Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, January 01, 2000 07:25 Subject: Re: [newbie] New Millenium > On Fri, 31 Dec 1999, Warren Doney wrote: > | 00.32 01/01/

Re: [newbie] New Millenium

2000-01-01 Thread Etien T. VanDenBroecke
ssage - > From: "Ernest N. Wilcox Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Saturday, January 01, 2000 07:25 > Subject: Re: [newbie] New Millenium > > > > On Fri, 31 Dec 1999, Warren Doney wrote: > > | 00.32 01/01/00 NZDT > >

Re: [newbie] New Millenium

1999-12-31 Thread Warren Doney
- Original Message - From: "Des Wass" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, January 01, 2000 9:19 AM Subject: Re: [newbie] New Millenium > And Happy New year to your all! > > On 01/01/00, Warren Doney said: > >00.32 01/0

Re: [Re: [newbie] New Millenium]

1999-12-31 Thread Michael Scottaline
bluebottle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What I want to know is how you were sober enough to send email at 32 minutes > past midnight in 2000. You're a traitor to the cause:-) = Why would sending email be a problem? I do it all the time. It's only 5:13 PM w

Re: [newbie] New Millenium

1999-12-31 Thread John Aldrich
On Fri, 31 Dec 1999, you wrote: > What I want to know is how you were sober enough to send email at 32 minutes > past midnight in 2000. You're a traitor to the cause:-) > > It's 21.00 Greenwich Mean Time on 31/12/99 so I'm off to celebrate. > > Happy 2000 to all - I'll even include BG altough

Re: [newbie] New Millenium

1999-12-31 Thread bluebottle
What I want to know is how you were sober enough to send email at 32 minutes past midnight in 2000. You're a traitor to the cause:-) It's 21.00 Greenwich Mean Time on 31/12/99 so I'm off to celebrate. Happy 2000 to all - I'll even include BG altough he won't get any of my money :-) John the N

RE: [newbie] New Millenium

1999-12-31 Thread heretic
> From: Lyndon Lininger Sr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Friday, December 31, 1999 10:28 AM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: [newbie] New Millenium > > > > > > Warren Doney wrote: > > > > > > 00.32 01/01/00 NZDT > >

RE: [newbie] New Millenium

1999-12-31 Thread Ken Wilson
These are the same people that think Windows is an operating system. -Original Message- From: Jeffrey A. Crum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: December 31, 1999 11:10 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [newbie] New Millenium Yeah, I love these people. > -Original Mess

Re: [newbie] New Millenium

1999-12-31 Thread Des Wass
And Happy New year to your all! On 01/01/00, Warren Doney said: >00.32 01/01/00 NZDT >Happy new Millenium all... > >-- >Full plate & packing steel! - Minsk Go for the eyes Boo !!! -- | http://www.prowebservers.com Desmond Wass| Web Hosting Systems {Mobile Stolen} |

Re: [newbie] New Millenium

1999-12-31 Thread Lyndon Lininger Sr.
Check it out the millenium isn't until january 1, 2001. - Original Message - From: "Warren Doney" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, December 31, 1999 1:14 PM Subject: Re: [newbie] New Millenium > > - Original Message -

RE: [newbie] New Millenium

1999-12-31 Thread Ralph | byte-runner |
PLZ GET OFF OF IT DON'T BE SO TECH-YYY :-) BYTE -Original Message- From: Warren Doney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 31, 1999 2:15 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [newbie] New Millenium - Original Message - From: "Lyndon Lininger S

Re: [newbie] New Millenium

1999-12-31 Thread Warren Doney
- Original Message - From: "Lyndon Lininger Sr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, January 01, 2000 5:28 AM Subject: Re: [newbie] New Millenium > Warren Doney wrote: > > > > 00.32 01/01/00 NZDT > > Happy new

RE: [newbie] New Millenium

1999-12-31 Thread Jeffrey A. Crum
Yeah, I love these people. > -Original Message- > From: Lyndon Lininger Sr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, December 31, 1999 10:28 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [newbie] New Millenium > > > Warren Doney wrote: > > > > 00.32 0

Re: [newbie] New Millenium

1999-12-31 Thread Lyndon Lininger Sr
Warren Doney wrote: > > 00.32 01/01/00 NZDT > Happy new Millenium all... > > -- > Full plate & packing steel! - Minsk The new millenium isn't for another year.