On Fri, 2003-06-27 at 05:04, JoeHill wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Jun 2003 15:39:13 +1000
> Trevor Rhodes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> uttered:
>
> > Is there a problem with your mailer? I seem to get a 'lot' of email
> > here on this list from you that doesn't actually have anything from
> > you in it. It's as i
On Fri, 27 Jun 2003 15:39:13 +1000
Trevor Rhodes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> uttered:
> Is there a problem with your mailer? I seem to get a 'lot' of email
> here on this list from you that doesn't actually have anything from
> you in it. It's as if you reply to an email and just click 'send'
> without
On Monday 23 June 2003 11:37 pm, Keith wrote:
> The WEBMASTER is at fault NOT ORIN HATCH...
>
> On Friday 20 June 2003 12:06 am, Aron Smith wrote:
> > On Thu, 2003-06-19 at 18:29, Carroll Grigsby wrote:
> > > On Thursday 19 June 2003 07:37 pm, Mark wrote:
> > > > Seems Orrin Hatch also maybe a soft
> I am wondering something, though - how can you have friends AND be a
> linux newbie at the same time? I must be missing something (grin)
Love spreading the word about Linux...Each new release makes our job of
educating people about Linux easier.
I DO wish I had more time to really dig into Linux
On Tue, 2003-06-24 at 08:48, Keith wrote:
> Yes, ultimately Hatch is responsible, but while ignorance is no reason for
> absolute immunity, Why would a politician who is a magnet for liberal arrows
> knowingly allow this error while at the same time trying to fight the
> problem.
> I was the onl
On 25 Jun 2003 09:02:39 +1000
Stephen Kuhn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> uttered:
> > I'm active in the legislature, raise a daughter while single,
> > homeschool, music, writing, sustainable agriculture, enviromental
> > issues, organic farming, scratch make ALL my own food, raise most of
> > it, bake brea
On Wed, 2003-06-25 at 01:48, Keith wrote:
> Yes, ultimately Hatch is responsible, but while ignorance is no reason for
> absolute immunity, Why would a politician who is a magnet for liberal arrows
> knowingly allow this error while at the same time trying to fight the
> problem.
> I was the onl
Yes, ultimately Hatch is responsible, but while ignorance is no reason for
absolute immunity, Why would a politician who is a magnet for liberal arrows
knowingly allow this error while at the same time trying to fight the
problem.
I was the only person in the State of Wisconsin to win a reversal
Yes, ultimately Hatch is responsible, but while ignorance is no reason for
absolute immunity, Why would a politician who is a magnet for liberal arrows
knowingly allow this error while at the same time trying to fight the
problem.
I was the only person in the State of Wisconsin to win a reversal
On Tuesday 24 June 2003 12:37 am, Keith wrote:
> The WEBMASTER is at fault NOT ORIN HATCH...
>
> On Friday 20 June 2003 12:06 am, Aron Smith wrote:
> > On Thu, 2003-06-19 at 18:29, Carroll Grigsby wrote:
> > > On Thursday 19 June 2003 07:37 pm, Mark wrote:
> > > > Seems Orrin Hatch also maybe a sof
Title: RE: [newbie] Orrin Hatch: farging icehole!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Keith
Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 11:37 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [newbie] Orrin Hatch: farging icehole!
The WEBMASTER is at fault NOT
On 23 Jun 2003 at 23:37, Keith wrote:
> The WEBMASTER is at fault NOT ORIN HATCH...
>
>
> On Friday 20 June 2003 12:06 am, Aron Smith wrote:
> > On Thu, 2003-06-19 at 18:29, Carroll Grigsby wrote:
> > > On Thursday 19 June 2003 07:37 pm, Mark wrote:
> > > > Seems Orrin Hatch also maybe a softwar
On Tue, 2003-06-24 at 14:37, Keith wrote:
> The WEBMASTER is at fault NOT ORIN HATCH...
Mmmm...a bit of a touchy subject, hmmm?
Is this to say that it's alright for a politician - who is supposed to
be trusted BY THE PEOPLE to have NO KNOWLEDGE of TECHNOLOGY THAT THIS
POLITICIAN CREATES LAWS FOR?
The WEBMASTER is at fault NOT ORIN HATCH...
On Friday 20 June 2003 12:06 am, Aron Smith wrote:
> On Thu, 2003-06-19 at 18:29, Carroll Grigsby wrote:
> > On Thursday 19 June 2003 07:37 pm, Mark wrote:
> > > Seems Orrin Hatch also maybe a software pirate
> > > Orrin Hatch: Software Pirate?
> > > ht
On Fri, 2003-06-20 at 10:15, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Aron Smith
> Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2003 11:58 PM
> To: Newbie
> Subject: Re: [newbie] Orrin Hatch: farging icehole!
> >
On Friday 20 June 2003 01:29 pm, Jim Dawson wrote:
> Don't forget the fact that his web page also linked to a p0rn site!
>
> (I'm sure it was unintentional. Most likely the DNS registration expired
> and a porn site operator grabbed it up... Either way it's kind of funny
> having a 'conservative re
On Fri, 2003-06-20 at 00:11, Miark wrote:
> Is it my imagination, or has the list spit this message out three times
> already?
>
> Miark
The list is experiencing it's "monthly"
--
Sat Jun 21 07:50:00 EST 2003
07:50:00 up 7 days, 15:04, 3 users, load average: 0.15, 0.17, 0.13
Okay, this message has come up five times now. What the hell is
wrong with the Mandrake list server?
Miark
On Wed, 18 Jun 2003 08:52:34 -0400
JoeHill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> this guy is a *nutjob*.
>
> http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/entertainment/2999780.stm
>
> --
> + Joe Hill
> + Regi
!)
-Original Message-
From: Carroll Grigsby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2003 21:29:05 -0400
Subject: Re: [newbie] Orrin Hatch: farging icehole!
On Thursday 19 June 2003 07:37 pm, Mark wrote:
> Seems Orrin Hatch also maybe a software pirate
>
Well it does seem to be sort of a loosely strung group we have here. Very
nice. 8^)
MRW
- Original Message -
From: "Miark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2003 10:11 AM
Subject: Re: [newbie] Orrin Hatch: farging icehole!
>
Title: RE: [newbie] Orrin Hatch: farging icehole!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Aron Smith
Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2003 11:58 PM
To: Newbie
Subject: Re: [newbie] Orrin Hatch: farging icehole!
On Thu, 2003-06-19 at 01:58
Is it my imagination, or has the list spit this message out three times
already?
Miark
On Wed, 18 Jun 2003 08:52:34 -0400
JoeHill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> this guy is a *nutjob*.
>
> http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/entertainment/2999780.stm
>
> --
> + Joe Hill
> + Registered Linux user #2
On Thu, 2003-06-19 at 18:29, Carroll Grigsby wrote:
> On Thursday 19 June 2003 07:37 pm, Mark wrote:
> > Seems Orrin Hatch also maybe a software pirate
> > Orrin Hatch: Software Pirate?
> > http://wired.com/news/politics/0,1283,59305,00.html
>
> Mark:
> Thanks for this excellent link. I'd seen ano
> Todd, Todd - Don't get too huffed up there
Hey, i resemble that remark...
huff
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
On Thursday 19 June 2003 07:37 pm, Mark wrote:
> Seems Orrin Hatch also maybe a software pirate
> Orrin Hatch: Software Pirate?
> http://wired.com/news/politics/0,1283,59305,00.html
Mark:
Thanks for this excellent link. I'd seen another version of this story, but it
didn't have all the juicy mate
: Re: [newbie] Orrin Hatch: farging icehole!
On Thu, 19 Jun 2003 11:59:04 -0500
"Jim Dawson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> To 'American Conservatives' (You know, the people who find Rush
> Limbaugh 'Insightful') the term 'Liberal' is about a
Message -
From: "Todd Slater" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2003 1:56 PM
Subject: Re: Re: [newbie] Orrin Hatch: farging icehole!
> On Thu, Jun 19, 2003 at 11:59:04AM -0500, Jim Dawson wrote:
> > To 'American Conservati
On Thu, 19 Jun 2003 11:59:04 -0500
"Jim Dawson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> To 'American Conservatives' (You know, the people who find Rush
> Limbaugh 'Insightful') the term 'Liberal' is about as a vile of
> an insult as you can possibly imagine. Particularly if you are
> using that term again
On Thu, Jun 19, 2003 at 11:59:04AM -0500, Jim Dawson wrote:
> To 'American Conservatives' (You know, the people who find Rush Limbaugh
> 'Insightful') the term 'Liberal' is about as a vile of an insult as you can possibly
> imagine. Particularly if you are using that term against a high ranking R
On Thu, 19 Jun 2003 16:49:24 +0300
Robin Turner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> uttered:
> It's just after the piece about SCO
> suing Sams and O'Reilly for pirating the code to "Hello World".
/joehill pisses self
--
+ Joe Hill
+ Registered Linux user #282046
+ Homepage: http://nodex.sytes.net
+ ICQ# 279
Robin Turner wrote:
Stephen Kuhn wrote:
On Wed, 2003-06-18 at 23:32, JoeHill wrote:
this guy is a *nutjob*.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/entertainment/2999780.stm
Er, Joe, don't talk about family members like that, mate. It's not nice.
(grin)
The guy's a liberal wuss. Targetting computers is no
On Thu, 2003-06-19 at 20:56, Mike Wafkowski wrote:
> Stephen - What if I dig real fast...any timeframe for getting out of
> Bushville, aka Nixonovia aka Reaganomica?
> I'm surrounded by young people licking their lips and grateful about what
> useless consumer good they're going to
> buy with the $
On Thu, 19 Jun 2003 06:56:50 -0400
"Mike Wafkowski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> uttered:
> Homeland Security is at the door. Gotta run!
>
> =
> BLAT!
> =
>
> The author of this email has been profiled by TIA as a threat to
> national security. #23454533maT
> (formerly known as the citizen named
available to receive any responses to this message.
Your Friend and Protector
John Ashcroft
Attorney General
- Original Message -
From: "Stephen Kuhn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Mandrake Newbie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2003 6:11 AM
On Thu, 2003-06-19 at 18:58, MWafkowski wrote:
> Orrin Hatch is a Liberal!? Shet, then things are even worse than I
> thought here in AmeriKa.
>
> Let me know when the "conservatives" arrive so I can start digging a hole in
> the ground.
>
> Mike Wafkowski
40 years of digging left me in Aust
>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2003 3:57 AM
Subject: Re: [newbie] Orrin Hatch: farging icehole!
> Stephen Kuhn wrote:
> > On Wed, 2003-06-18 at 23:32, JoeHill wrote:
> >
> >>this guy is a *nutjob*.
> >>
> >>http://news.bbc.co.uk/2
On Thu, 2003-06-19 at 17:57, Robin Turner wrote:
> The guy's a liberal wuss. Targetting computers is not what we need, we
> need to go after the criminals themselves, and the solution is Black
> ICE. The next generation of Palladium should include a Trustworthy
> Computing feature which would
Stephen Kuhn wrote:
On Wed, 2003-06-18 at 23:32, JoeHill wrote:
this guy is a *nutjob*.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/entertainment/2999780.stm
Er, Joe, don't talk about family members like that, mate. It's not nice.
(grin)
The guy's a liberal wuss. Targetting computers is not what we need, we
n
On 19 Jun 2003 15:17:57 +1000
Stephen Kuhn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> uttered:
> "Good American Beer"
ROFLMAO!
why are American beer and sex in a canoe similar?
they're both fscking close to water.
--
+ Joe Hill
+ Registered Linux user #282046
+ Homepage: http://nodex.sytes.net
+ ICQ# 279518458
On Thu, 2003-06-19 at 15:03, MWafkowski wrote:
> Welcome to amerika!
Da! Comrade!
--
Thu Jun 19 15:20:00 EST 2003
15:20:00 up 5 days, 22:34, 3 users, load average: 0.56, 0.54, 0.42
-
|____ |kuhn media aus
On Thu, 2003-06-19 at 14:58, Aron Smith wrote:
> > > this guy is a *nutjob*.
> > >
> > > http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/entertainment/2999780.stm
> >
> > Er, Joe, don't talk about family members like that, mate. It's not nice.
> And he is considered one of the Sane Senators
> > (grin)
SANE SENATOR.
T
On Wed, 2003-06-18 at 23:32, JoeHill wrote:
> this guy is a *nutjob*.
>
> http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/entertainment/2999780.stm
Er, Joe, don't talk about family members like that, mate. It's not nice.
(grin)
--
Thu Jun 19 14:40:00 EST 2003
14:40:00 up 5 days, 21:54, 3 users, load average: 0.5
42 matches
Mail list logo
