On Sun, 02 Jun 2002 01:18, Brian Parish wrote:
> I think you may have experienced the same scenario as me Kaj. I have
> sent the message below twice now, with different subjects and it has
> failed to show in either version, while other posts I sent before and
> after were showing up as usual. C
lacklist.
rgds
frank
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Chris Spackman
Sent: Saturday, 1 June 2002 7:29 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [newbie] Thrown off the list ?
On Saturday 01 June 2002 12:35 pm, ollyplaine wrote:
> On Fri, May
On Sat, 01 Jun 2002 16:39, Dennis Myers wrote:
> On Friday 31 May 2002 08:50 pm, you wrote:
> > On Saturday 01 June 2002 02:49 am, shane wrote:
> > > On Friday 31 May 2002 01:39 pm, Kaj Haulrich did speak unto the huddled
> > >
> > > masses, saying:
> > > > Two days ago I posted a question of my o
On Friday 31 May 2002 20:53, you wrote:
> Makes me kind'a sad, though. I think this list is very unique, informative,
> helpful and - sometimes - amusing.
I fully agree to all of that :-)
I have followed this list for longer that any other and have enjoyed all of
the above - if I miss it for
On Sat, 2002-06-01 at 18:25, Dennis Myers wrote:
> On Saturday 01 June 2002 09:24 am, you wrote:
> > On Sat, Jun 01, 2002 at 11:38:49PM +1000, Brian Parish wrote:
> > > OK, there is something going on here. I replied to this and attached a
> > > post that seems to do the same thing. My reply has
On Friday 31 May 2002 08:50 pm, you wrote:
> On Saturday 01 June 2002 02:49 am, shane wrote:
> > On Friday 31 May 2002 01:39 pm, Kaj Haulrich did speak unto the huddled
> >
> > masses, saying:
> > > Two days ago I posted a question of my own, concerning spam. Maybe
> > > that's the reason ? - Mayb
On Saturday 01 June 2002 09:24 am, you wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 01, 2002 at 11:38:49PM +1000, Brian Parish wrote:
> > OK, there is something going on here. I replied to this and attached a
> > post that seems to do the same thing. My reply has not shown up, but a
> > later post has. Seems there is
On Saturday 01 June 2002 10:41 pm, Frans Ketelaars wrote:
> On 01 Jun 2002 23:18:37 +1000
> Brian Parish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > I think you may have experienced the same scenario as me Kaj. I have
> > sent the message below twice now, with different subjects and it has
> > failed t
On 01 Jun 2002 23:18:37 +1000
Brian Parish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think you may have experienced the same scenario as me Kaj. I have
> sent the message below twice now, with different subjects and it has
> failed to show in either version, while other posts I sent before and
> after we
On Sat, 2002-06-01 at 06:39, Kaj Haulrich wrote:
> On Friday 31 May 2002 10:00 pm, shane wrote:
> > On Friday 31 May 2002 12:53 pm, Kaj Haulrich did speak unto the huddled
> >
> > masses, saying:
> > > Please forgive me for waisting your bandwidth.
> > > After about - what - half a year on the lis
On Saturday 01 June 2002 12:35 pm, ollyplaine wrote:
> On Fri, May 31, 2002 at 10:08:41PM -0400, D. Olson wrote:
> > On Friday 31 May 2002 09:50 pm, you wrote:(first couple of lines from
> > Haj)
> >
> > > On the other hand : maybe I just screwed something up in my post.
> > > Something that the i
On Sat, 01 Jun 2002 13:50, Kaj Haulrich wrote:
> On Saturday 01 June 2002 02:49 am, shane wrote:
> > On Friday 31 May 2002 01:39 pm, Kaj Haulrich did speak unto the huddled
> >
> > masses, saying:
> > > Two days ago I posted a question of my own, concerning spam. Maybe
> > > that's the reason ? -
On Sat, 01 Jun 2002 13:50, Kaj Haulrich wrote:
> On Saturday 01 June 2002 02:49 am, shane wrote:
> > On Friday 31 May 2002 01:39 pm, Kaj Haulrich did speak unto the huddled
> >
> > masses, saying:
> > > Two days ago I posted a question of my own, concerning spam. Maybe
> > > that's the reason ? -
On Fri, May 31, 2002 at 10:08:41PM -0400, D. Olson wrote:
> On Friday 31 May 2002 09:50 pm, you wrote:(first couple of lines from
> Haj)
> > On the other hand : maybe I just screwed something up in my post. Something
> > that the internet can't digest. - Like spam ???
>
> Well, I can't digest spa
On Friday 31 May 2002 09:50 pm, you wrote:
> On the other hand : maybe I just screwed something up in my post. Something
> that the internet can't digest. - Like spam ???
Well, I can't digest spam myself, so there ya go. ;)
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
Go to http://www
On Saturday 01 June 2002 02:49 am, shane wrote:
> On Friday 31 May 2002 01:39 pm, Kaj Haulrich did speak unto the huddled
>
> masses, saying:
> > Two days ago I posted a question of my own, concerning spam. Maybe that's
> > the reason ? - Maybe the list has some "filter" who react to the phrase
>
Kaj Haulrich wrote:
>
> Hi all -
>
> Please forgive me for waisting your bandwidth.
> After about - what - half a year on the list, I'm suddenly "censored out".
> Don't know why - to many beers and cheers maybe ?
> Makes me kind'a sad, though. I think this list is very unique, informative,
> hel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday 31 May 2002 01:39 pm, Kaj Haulrich did speak unto the huddled
masses, saying:
> Two days ago I posted a question of my own, concerning spam. Maybe that's
> the reason ? - Maybe the list has some "filter" who react to the phrase
> "spam" ?
On Friday 31 May 2002 12:53 pm, Kaj Haulrich did speak unto the huddled
masses, saying:
> Please forgive me for waisting your bandwidth.
> After about - what - half a year on the list, I'm suddenly "censored
> out". Don't know why - to many beers and cheers maybe ?
> Makes me kind'a sad, though.
19 matches
Mail list logo
